23 December 2010 · Minister for Infrastructure (on appeal)
Clare Court, 14, Marathon Road, Douglas, Isle Of Man, IM2 4hl
The proposal involved forming a 3.2m wide entrance in the existing boundary wall along Victoria Road, lowering the wall to 1m height, installing 1.6m high timber gates set back 5m from the highway, and adding smooth rendered tapered walls (1-1.7m high) and hardstanding for parking.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The documents detail the Planning Committee's refusal despite the officer's recommendation for approval, citing unacceptable highway conflicts on a busy road opposite parked cars and harmful visual im…
General Policy 2
Requires development to respect amenity and character. Officer found visual impact from gap in wall and height reduction harmful but acceptable on balance due to varied existing street scene with mixed frontages and adjacent rendered walls, not warranting refusal.
Transport Policy 4
Concerns highway safety and traffic flow. Amendments with 5m setback gates and 1m wall height addressed prior inspector's visibility and manoeuvring issues; Highways Division confirmed no implications.
Transport Policy 6 - Equal weight for vehicles and pedestrians
Related to access standards and free flow of traffic. Officer concluded proposal meets standards, no prejudicial impact despite busy location, supported by Highways non-opposition.
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
Approved drawings
This permission relates to the creation of a hardstanding and a vehicular access as shown in drawing numbers 01 AT Nov.09, 02 AT Nov.09, and 03 AT Nov. 09 date-stamped 27th August 2010.
Do not oppose, has no traffic management, parking or road safety implications
Responses to objections: no consistent wall concept, other accesses exist, better visibility than others, improves cramped Marathon Road access, Highways consulted and no objection
The original application 10/01277/B for creation of hard standing and vehicular access onto Victoria Road was refused by the Planning Committee on 16 December 2010 for highway safety/free flow of traffic concerns and harm to visual amenities/streetscene from wall alterations. This followed a prior refused application 10/0003/B dismissed at appeal due to defective design. The appellant argued the revised scheme addressed previous highway safety issues, gained Highways Division approval, and existing access from Marathon Road was inadequate. The planning officer recommended approval but the Committee refused. Inspector David Ward held an inquiry on 16 March 2011, found highway concerns unsupported by evidence, noted no continuous wall frontage exists, and concluded no unacceptable harm to streetscene. The Minister accepted the recommendation, allowed the appeal on 19 April 2011 subject to conditions.
Precedent Value
Demonstrates Committees must provide evidence at inquiry to defend refusal against officer recommendation and technical consultee approval. Applicants succeed by precisely fixing prior appeal defects and disproving 'continuous frontage' assumptions. Inspectors prioritise highways expertise over lay concerns where no special character protection.
Inspector: David Ward
