Planning Report And Recommendations {{table:113304}} {{table:113305}} {{table:113306}} ### Considerations {{table:113307}} ### Written Representations ### Consultations ### Policy
Officer's Report
The site comprises the curtilage of a terraced house (Number 68) on Derby Road.
Within the Conservation Area.
Proposed is the installation of a replacement front-door – “American Rosewood PVC”.
This would be disappointing within a Conservation Area – perhaps the Conservation Section can persuade the applicant to do better. Refer to Mr S Moore.
See photograph – the work has already been done. There are others, but Number 74 is how it ought to be. Inclined to refuse.
Recommendation
Recommended Decision: Refused
Date of Recommendation: 24.08.2005
Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal
C: Conditions for approval N: Notes attached to conditions R: Reasons for refusal O: Notes attached to refusals
R 1. The proposed doorway, and in particular the bland fan-light and side-lights are out of keeping with the original architecture and would not preserve or enhance the appearance of the Conservation Area.
R 2. It is noted that this work has already been undertaken. Accordingly, there should be submitted within one month of this notice taking effect, a scheme for restoring the original appearance of the doorway.
Decision Made : ... Committee Meeting Date : ...
Refuse. 2.9.05
The proposed doorway, and in particular the bland fan-light and side-lights are out of keeping with the original architecture and would not preserve or enhance the appearance of the Conservation Area.
Note: It is noted that this work has already been undertaken. Accordingly, the should be submitted within one month of this notice taking effect, a scheme for restoring the original appearance of the doorway.
General Report
Site Visited
Yes / No
1. The site comprises the curtilage of a terraced house (No. 68) on Derby Road
2. Within a Conservation Area.
3. Proposed is the installation of a replacement front-door - "American Rosewood PVC"
4. This would be disappointing within a CA - perhaps the Conservation Section can persuade the applicant to do better. Refer to S. Moore.
☑ 15/8
Recommendations
Approval / Refuse
See photograph - the work has already been done. There are others, but No. 74 is how it ought to be. Inclined to refuse.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
