2 October 2012 · Council of Ministers
Field 311825, Poortown Road, Peel, Isle Of Man, IM5 1gq
The application sought to vary condition 4 of the prior approval (PA 10/00544/B) for 101 dwellings with highway, drainage, open space and landscaping works on fields east of Peel, between Derby/Poortown Roads and QE2 High School.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The inspector found 'no justifiable planning reason why the entire road layout on the site, including the parking areas, should be laid to at least base course level and made available for use by occu…
Strategic Policy 10
Promotes integrated transport network via new development location/design. Variation has no material effect as approved development retains safe/convenient access for all users.
General Policy 2
Requires no unacceptable road safety/traffic effects. Proposal ensures adequate access/parking without impacting capacity or safety on local highways.
Transport Policy 4
Relevant to highway design/access. Unaffected as overall development design and highways unchanged by variation.
Transport Policy 6 - Equal weight for vehicles and pedestrians
Concerns highway design. No conflict as site road/parking layouts pre-approved and unaltered.
Transport Policy 7
Parking provision. Extent unchanged, so prior assessment unaffected.
Occupation prior to highway/parking completion
No dwelling shall be occupied until: (a) the new roundabout as shown by approved drawing 2313.127 Site Layout has been constructed to at least base course level and; (b) the estate road between the dwelling to be occupied and the new roundabout, including the footways, has been constructed to at least base course level; and (c) the parking spaces for the dwellings to be occupied have been provided; and (d) where the parking spaces to serve the dwelling to be occupied (including any flat to be occupied) are located within a parking area rather than on the plot of the dwelling, the estate road between those parking spaces and the new roundabout, including the footways, has been constructed to at least base course level.
No objection to variation subject to suggested rewording ensuring roundabout and access roads to base course level prior to occupation
Supports application; delays impact purchasers and economy; no change to approved scheme, only road phasing; no impact beyond future homeowners
Private residents (Trevor & Allison Cowin of Sea Peep) submitted detailed objections to the application to vary condition 4, citing procedural irregularities and lack of detail; homebuyers submitted support letters emphasizing minimal impact and personal hardship from delays.
Key concern: application incomplete due to lack of details on condition 4 variation and highway access arrangements
Trevor & Allison Cowin (Sea Peep)
ObjectionWe wish to object to planning application at caption; the application is, therefore, incomplete as the applicant has not stated clearly, as required by the application form, what it proposes to do; This would result in the occupier(s) of such dwelling having to use uncompleted estate roads; We are at a loss to understand why Mr Humphrey... should make such a shoddy application which is lacking in so much detail that on its face simply cannot be approved
Mr & Mrs McEvoy
SupportWe write in support of the above application; All this application seeks to do is to change the requirement that all roads within the development need to be completed before any of the completed dwellings can be occupied in a phased manner; we struggle to see how this application to vary the condition has any impact on anyone else apart from the future homeowners within the site
The original approval PA 10/00544/B in December 2011 permitted 101 dwellings with condition 4 requiring the entire road layout and parking to base course level prior to any dwelling occupation. The application 12/00914C sought variation to enable phased road construction for viability and efficiency, supported by the Highway Authority. The inspector held a public inquiry on 13 September 2012, found no planning justification for the original strict condition, and concluded phased provision adequately secures access, parking, and safety without policy conflicts. Third-party objections on affordable housing and playground timing were dismissed as unaffected. The inspector recommended approval with a detailed reworded condition.
Precedent Value
This sets precedent that strict 'whole-site upfront' road conditions can be varied to phased provision on large sites if core access/parking secured and highway authority supportive, provided no formal original justification exists. Future applicants should secure highway endorsement, propose precise wording, and show alternatives achieve same purposes without viability risks.
Inspector: Stephen Amos MA (Cantab) MCD MRTPI
