10 June 2019 · Planning Committee
Perk Cottage, Knock Froy Road, Santon, Isle Of Man, IM4 1jd
The proposal sought permission for a temporary campsite on a 1.7 hectare field next to Perk Cottage, including up to 100 tents and glamping pods parallel to the A5, 20 motorhomes to the west screened by hedging, parking in the middle, and mobile toilet/shower units north of the cottage.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer concluded the proposal conflicted with the site's designation as High Landscape Value and Scenic Significance, with a presumption against development under General Policy 3 and Environment…
Environment Policy 1
Presumption against development in High Landscape Value and Scenic Significance areas. Officer assessed the campsite's tents, motorhomes, vehicles and units as visibly harmful to countryside character, with no justification to override given existing campsite supply.
Environment Policy 2
Protects landscape quality in designated areas. Proposal failed as visible elements would detract from scenic significance, unlike screened or established sites.
General Policy 3
Presumption against development on undesignated land, especially high landscape value. No overriding need justified approval despite tourism support.
General Policy 2
Requires development to respect surroundings (b,g), incorporate landscape features like trees (f), provide safe access/amenity (h,i). Failed on visual impact, tree harm, highway safety, pedestrian access and site amenity lacking facilities.
Transport Policy 4
Requires safe access visibility. Existing 40m splay insufficient vs 120m required, risking accidents on busy A5.
Transport Policy 6 - Equal weight for vehicles and pedestrians
Safe pedestrian access. No footway to nearest crossing 130m away on A5 side without facilities.
Business Policy 11
Supports tourism developments compliant with other policies. Temporary camping recognised as valid but this lacked need evidence, on-site facilities and links to existing operations unlike sports club precedents.
Santon Commissioners, Highway Services, and DEFA Forestry raised objections primarily related to highway safety, access visibility, tree protection, and long-term permanence of temporary camping structures; a neighbouring resident also opposed the application.
Key concern: highway safety due to unsafe access and inadequate visibility splays near A5 junction
Santon Commissioners
ObjectionTemporary tents at race periods would be acceptable, subject to public health requirements being assured.; There is a danger of permanence by motor homes and "pods" of possibly varying type and quality.
Conditions requested: no motor home should be retained on the site outside the specified period
Highway Services Division
ObjectionHighway Services oppose the application due to a lack of information, inadequate parking and highway safety as the development would intensify the use of an unsafe access that could lead to an increase in traffic accidents on a high speed main road.
DEFA Forestry
Conditional No ObjectionUsing a cellular confinement system it would be possible to protect the roots of these trees, but given the cost and complexity of this solution... focus on mitigation planting instead.
Conditions requested: information about proposed mitigation planting made available prior to determination; if no mitigation planting, show how existing trees will be protected