Erection of a dwelling

Refusal Reasons

• ✗Whilst it is considered that the site would comply with the definition of previously developed land which contains a significant amount of building, it is not considered the redundancy of the building has been proven sufficiently. Additionally, given the design, size, height and massing, the proposal would not reduce the impact nor improve landscape or wider environment therefore contrary to General Policy 3 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan.
• ✗By reason of the inappropriate and non-traditional proposed proportions and form of the property and its fenestration, the proposal would be contrary to Planning Circular 3/91 Guide to the Design of Residential Development in the Countryside and would result in a harmful and urbanising effect on the countryside.
• ✗The proposed development could lead to an adverse impact upon the aquatic and bankside habitats and species of the watercourse, and therefore would be contrary to Environmental Policy 7 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan.
• ✗The proposed new bio disc and surface water soakaway are not indicated as being within the applicant's ownership. Additionally, the pipes from the dwelling to these units require infrastructure which cross a public highway. No information has been submitted which permits such works. Consequently, it is considered the proposal does not adequately show how drainage provisions can be provided.