9 November 2021
Villa Rhencullen, Rhencullen, Kirk Michael, Isle Of Man, IM6 2ha
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
Neighbouring property owners and Michael District Commissioners objected to the retrospective raised decking application due to overbearing impact, privacy loss, and non-compliance with RDG guidelines, while Highways Division had no interest.
Key concern: overbearing impact and loss of privacy to neighbouring property
Rose Cottage owners
ObjectionRaised decking, terraces or patios that are higher than 0.3 metres require a specific planning approval. It is a requirement to ensure that neighbours' privacy is maintained by installing screening (fence, hedge etc.) that reaches the height of 1.8m above ground level.; Large areas of decking are unlikely to be supported at the side or front of a property.; the decking has been constructed right up to the boundary of the properties and our two upstairs windows look directly out onto the decking.
Michael District Commissioners
ObjectionRaised decking, terraces or patios that are higher than 0.3 metres require specific planning approval.; Screening will only be appropriate if it does not cause loss of light and/or be overbearing to an adjoining property.; Large areas of decking are unlikely to be supported at the side or front of the property.; GOOD NEIGHBOURLINESS applicants are advised to consider the effects of their development on their neighbours; If they might feel "blocked in or overlooked" and/or if the development would feel "too close dominant/overbearing."
Michael District Commissioners
No Commentrequest deferment of the below application until after their meeting on Wednesday 6th October 2021
Department of Infrastructure (DOI) Highways Division
No ObjectionNo Highways Interest; NHI