Officer Report Forms

{{table:89790}} Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited ☐ YES ☑ NO We have investigated the structural aspects of the installation of the UPT and can confirm that it should have little impact on the very early masonry vaults in the cellars. In addition, the applicants agent has reduced the internal UPT shaft in height and altered its materials and finish to be more in keeping with the remainder of the building. We note that attention is drawn to the replacement of the windows "if it is required" as the building is registered the preference is toward the retention and overhauling of the existing windows. We would ask in this instant that more information is supplied relative to this aspect of the application Signed Date 8/12/04 Summary of objections/views Recommendations ☐ Approve/Refuse Signed Date 8/12/04 Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited YES/NO As a general note - No approval is made regarding the replacement of the roof - any such works will require further approval Further detail is required for the additional near door to the Douglas Hotel. Signed Date 9/12/04 Summary of objections/views Recommendations Approved/Refused (spir) Recommend approval of the application with condition that works are carried out in accordance with approved drawings. A full photographic survey is to be carried out prior to any works taking place. The colour scheme is to be signed with the conservation officer. Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited YES/NO Signed Date 9/12/04. Summary of objections/views Recommendations Approve/Refuse No approval is given to the alteration of the existing windows. No approval is given to the additional rear door to the Douglas without further detail. Signed Date 9/12/04. Planning Report and Recommendations General Report Site Visited YES/NO 1. The application seeks Registered Building consent for alterations to the Douglas Hotel (RB 186), such alterations being in accordance with the planning approval granted in respect of PA 03/1111. 2. Refer to J. Moore. SJH 3. The comments from the WA and Drainage Authority are not pertinent to an application for Reg'd Bldng consent only. Signed Date Summary of objections/views HA and LA - no objections Drainage Authority - defer for more information WA - premature (supply) DAO - usual standards Fire Service - consult re Fire Certificate Recommendations Approve/Refuse Signed Date {{table:89791}}