12 June 2003 · Planning Committee (on review)
23, Malew Street, Castletown, Isle Of Man, IM9 1ad
The proposal involved replacing existing timber framed sliding sash windows (and one shop window) with white uPVC casement windows at a terraced retail property on 23 Malew Street, Castletown. The site is within the heart of the Castletown Conservation Area, near The Parade and a street junction.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The Planning Committee determined that the proposed uPVC casement windows, by reason of their design and method of opening, would detract from the character and appearance of the building located with…
The Replacement of Windows and Doors
The circular requires original windows to preferably be repaired; if impracticable, visible replacements must match originals in opening method, glazing bars, and frame section regardless of material. The officer assessed the uPVC casements as failing these tests due to modern design, casement opening differing from sliding sash, and inability to replicate traditional features, causing harm to conservation area character. No tension noted beyond appellant's examples of nearby uPVC.
no views on the application, having no adverse traffic impacts
DOT Highways Division has no objection to application 03/00070/B, stating no adverse traffic impacts.
Highways Division of the Department of Transport
No Objectionthe application having been considered and having no adverse traffic impacts.; The Highways Division of the Department of Transport has no views on the following application
The original application PA 03/0070 for installation of uPVC windows and shop windows to replace existing at 23 Malew Street, Castletown, was refused by the Planning Committee on 29 May 2003 and confirmed on review on 28 July 2003, citing harm to the Castletown Conservation Area contrary to Planning Circular 1/98. The appellant argued for matching the existing uPVC shop front, noting neighbouring uPVC windows and dilapidated condition of existing timber windows. The Planning Committee defended the refusal based on the Circular requiring same opening method, glazing bars, and frame sections as originals to preserve character. The inspector, after written representations and site visit, found the existing timber windows restorable and that uPVC would harm the conservation area's character, recommending dismissal. The Minister agreed, confirming the refusal on 12 November 2003.
Precedent Value
This appeal reinforces strict application of Planning Circular 1/98 in conservation areas, prioritising repair of original timber sash windows over uPVC replacement regardless of isolated precedents or neighbours; applicants must provide robust evidence of irreparable condition and explore grants for compliant alternatives.
Inspector: Terrence Kemmann-Lane
