Loading document...
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SUMMARY. PROPOSED CONTINUATION OF LANDFILL ON SITE OFF STONEY MOUNTAIN ROAD, EAST FOXDALE, for DC SKIPS LTD
The proposal is to extend the application PA07/806/B to continue to landfill inert materials to lower levels than stated in that approval, but not yet achieved. There is space to landfill in the region of 27,000 Cu.M over an area of 1.4 hectares to achieve the revised levels, which will take about five years to complete based on the throughput records from the operator's Waste Transfer Station. This will be made up of approximately 26,000 Cu.M of inert materials, covered by a 5cm layer of topsoil already stockpiled on site (<700 Cu.M.) for this purpose, which will be spread as each phase is completed in accordance with the recommendations from the Wildlife Trust. (see copy attached) Surplus soil from the >3,000 Cu.M. already stockpiled on site will be made available for sale.
The site is less than one mile from the headquarters and maintenance facility of the waste collection operator, DCS Ltd. (formerly Dave Crowe Plant Hire), trading as DC Skips, which makes it an ideal location to landfill with minimum travel involved and enables staff to work on either site as workload demands.
The inert waste is a major bi-product of the general waste from hired skips collected by DC Skips Ltd and brought to the Company's licensed Waste Transfer Station at Billy Goat Park, Stoney Mountain Road, almost opposite the landfill site. Enclosed with this application is a flow-chart illustrating the Waste Stream Paths after sorting at the Waste Transfer Station, to the points of Final Disposal. Most of the waste streams (non-inert) from the Waste Transfer Station go direct to their final destination. The inert waste is transferred to the landfill site where further fine screening is carried out to ensure that all non-inert is removed and construction material unsuitable for recycling is deposited in the landfill site.
The site will only be operated during daylight hours between 8am and 5pm, Monday to Friday and 8am and 1pm Saturday. No lighting will be installed or used on the site. There are no utility services on the site as none are required, Dust suppression is carried out using water from a bowser filled at the Waste Transfer Station as required.
During the seven-year period of operations under the previous approval, lapsed in error due to an oversight, there have been no records of any complaints from neighbours, nor from environmental officers.
The following table summarises the impact, actual and possible, of the site and its activities on its surroundings
| Type of Impact | Effect of Impact | Direct Indirect Cumulative | Short term Long term Temporary Permanent | Neutral Positive Negative | Impact Level Negligible Low, Medium High |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact on residential amenity in terms of visual, dust, noise, vibration as result of traffic generated. | Visual: This site is not visible from Stoney Mountain Road. The site is located 300m South of Stoney Mountain Road and has been an existing landfill site, licensed for inert waste disposal, since 2000. Only two residential properties exist within 400m of the processing plant. A small number of other heavy commercial operations already exist within 500m of the proposed recycling site. Dust will be managed by water bowser spray, but is unlikely to be carried to any other property. Noise is only likely during daylight operating hours, but not exceeding 55 Db(A) beyond site boundaries and monitored by the operator and Environmental Health Dept. Vibration from traffic will be un-changed as all HGV's are already based at DC Skips main site within 600 m of proposed site, so will not have to travel to other sites to deliver materials for landfill. Every DC Skips Ltd vehicle returns to base daily so there will be no change to traffic generation. | Indirect Cumulative together with other adjacent site processes. | Long term The recycling operation will, by necessity, reduce in size as the landfill restoration completes, eventually eliminating the recycling on this site. | Positive due to the shorter travel distance of HGV's if DCS site is used, passing only two residential properties on the journey, reducing the Carbon footprint of DC Skips. | Negligible |
DC SKIPS LTD, LANDFILL SITE, SOUTH OF STONEY MOUNTAIN ROAD, EAST FOXDALE.
Renewal of planning consent to continue inert landfill on 1.4 hectare site, to revised lower levels. (PA/07/00806/B refers - recently lapsed)
1.1 The primary use of the subject site since 2000 has been to provide additional private landfill capacity for the Island to absorb only the inert waste stream permitted by DC Skips Ltd Waste Disposal License 04/2003/V3, thereby extending the life of other publicly-accessible landfill sites. This waste is generated only from collection of skips from the public and is initially separated from other waste at the Company’s waste transfer station nearby, also on Stoney Mountain Road. This landfill operation consists mainly of construction waste, although other inert types are permitted by the above license. A flow-chart showing the origin, processing and final disposal of the permitted wastes is attached.
1.2 In deciding whether or not to approve continuation of landfill on this site planners will need to consider, amongst other things, why the landfill material is not taken to other approved landfill sites. The reasoning behind this includes the following factors:
a) the subject site is close to the approved waste transfer station where all waste collected by the Company is received, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of the Company when dealing with the inert waste, by reduced mileage and maintenance on vehicles,
b) the subject site has been approved as a landfill site and has not yet achieved the final levels previously permitted. New, lower levels have been suggested – see para.1.4. To achieve these levels there is still space for approximately 27,000 Cu.M to be spread over an area of 14,000 square metres (1.4 hectares). This equates to approximately 5200 tonnes per year or 5 to 10 vehicle movements per working day. The material will be made up of approximately 26,000 Cu.M of inert materials, covered by a 5cm layer of topsoil (<700 Cu.M.) already stockpiled on site for this purpose, which will be spread as each area is completed in accordance with the recommendations from the Manx Wildlife Trust, to create a calcareous grassland suitable for grazing. There are >3000 Cu.M. of topsoil on site with surplus being made available for sale.
c) other approved disposal sites cease daily operations earlier than DC Skips landfill site and on some days do not open at all. To use other sites, and allowing for travel time, would significantly reduce the operating hours of DC Skips Waste Transfer Station, creating a backlog of incoming waste to sort, increasing costs and carbon footprint.
d) the close proximity of the subject site to the Waste Transfer Station allows more flexibility of staff when either site demands and, consequently, separate personnel welfare facilities are not required on this site. No members of the public are permitted on this site.
e) the subject site is already owned by Mr David Crowe, managing Director of DC Skips Ltd, so no charges are incurred to landfill this waste.
1.3 Should planning approval be given for the landfill, there will be a programme of progressive withdrawal from the site until the landfill area is filled and the site returned to grassland and wild-life habitat, using the advice obtained from the Manx Wild-life Trust for land preparation. (see copy attached)
1.4 The proposed sequence of progressively filling the site with inert materials is shown on the attached plan, with the intention to direct the filling to achieve a natural profile for woodland and wild-life habitat landscape. These levels will be set out on the site with visual marker posts to assist site operatives and licensing observers to measure progress and compliance. Using throughput records from the Waste Transfer Station it is estimated that the landfill operation will take about five years to achieve the proposed profile levels, which are lower than the previous approval after taking advice from the Planning Department for a more natural land profile. After the site has been fully restored the landfill materials from DC Skips Waste Transfer Station will need to be taken to other approved sites.
1.5 Provision is made for the manoeuvring of vehicles within the site; together with a covered quarantine skip should any materials be found during unloading that should not be landfilled.
1.6 The site will only be operated during daylight hours between 8am and 5pm, Monday to Friday and 8am and 1pm Saturday. No lighting will be installed or used on the site. There are no permanent utility services on this site. Water for dust suppression is drawn from a portable bowser, filled at the Waste Transfer Station when required.
1.7 Existing provision for weekly cleaning of filters to ensure no pollution enters the nearby watercourse will be maintained during the landfill operations.
The various policies of the Strategic Plan 2007 have been individually considered and their relevance to this application indicated in the table below. Note that where applicable, policy requirements are compliant. Brief justifications are stated where relevant.
| Policy type | Policy No. | n/a | Complies | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic | 1 | Yes | ||
| 2 | n/a | Rural location essential | ||
| 3 | n/a | Policy applies to towns & villages | ||
| 4 | Yes | |||
| 5 | n/a | Policy applies to new development | ||
| 6 | n/a | Not in 'major' category | ||
| 7 | Yes | Previously approved for same use | ||
| 8 | n/a | Not Tourist related | ||
| 9 | n/a | Excluded by location | ||
| 10 | Yes | Employs local labour force | ||
| 11 | n/a | Not related to housing | ||
| 12 | n/a | Not related to housing |
| Spatial | Yes | Long standing local activity in area | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General | 1 | Yes | ||
| 2 | Yes | |||
| 3 | Yes | See (e) and (g) of policy requirements | ||
| 4 | n/a | Can be controlled by conditions | ||
| 5 | n/a | |||
| 6 | n/a | Policy applies to towns & villages | ||
| 7 | n/a | Policy applies to towns & villages | ||
| 8 | Yes | No advertising display | ||
| 9 | n/a | Not accessible to public | ||
| Environment | 1 | n/a | Site use approved prior to SP2007 | |
| 2 | Yes | Not designated AHVL | ||
| 3 | Yes | No woodland affected | ||
| 4 | Yes | Species and habitats not affected | ||
| 5 | Yes | Species and habitats not affected | ||
| Policy type | Policy No. | Complies | Notes | |
| Environment | 6 | n/a | Not a Heritage Site | |
| 7 | Yes | Nearby watercourse protected | ||
| 8 | n/a | No buildings of any sort on site | ||
| 9 | n/a | Not a coastal location. No land erosion | ||
| 10 | n/a | Not at risk of flooding | ||
| 11 | n/a | Not a coastal location | ||
| 12 | n/a | Not a coastal location | ||
| 13 | n/a | Not at risk of flooding due to elevation | ||
| 14 | n/a | Site and soils not within classifications | ||
| 15 | n/a | Not agricultural or horticultural | ||
| 16 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 17 | n/a | Not for horticultural use | ||
| 18 | n/a | No retail activity on site | ||
| 19 | n/a | No equestrian use | ||
| 20 | n/a | No equestrian use | ||
| 21 | n/a | No equestrian use | ||
| 22 | Yes | Pollution, emissions etc controlled by WDL | ||
| 23 | Yes | Summary of EIA enclosed | ||
| Environment | 24 | Yes | Brief EIA enclosed | |
| 25 | n/a | No pollution from inert materials. | ||
| 26 | n/a | Not on or near contaminated land | ||
| 27 | n/a | Not contaminated land | ||
| 28 | n/a | No effect on ground stability.No buildings | ||
| 29 | n/a | No public permitted on site | ||
| 30 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 31 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 32 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 33 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 34 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 35 | n/a | Not a conservation area | ||
| 36 | n/a | Not a conservation area | ||
| 37 | n/a | No advertisements displayed | ||
| 38 | n/a | No advertisements displayed | ||
| 39 | n/a | No buildings on site |
WASTE POLICY 1
| 40 | n/a | No Ancient Monuments on or near site | ||
| 41 | n/a | No Ancient Monuments on or near site | ||
| 42 | n/a | Not in a settlement | ||
| 43 | n/a | Not in regeneration area. | ||
| Housing | ALL | n/a | No buildings on site | |
| Business | 1 | Yes | Business expansion requires continuity | |
| 2 | Yes | Site employs local labour | ||
| 3 | Yes | Land already zoned by prev. approval | ||
| 4 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 5 | Yes | Heavy bulk product produced on site | ||
| 6 | n/a | Site has no other Use potential | ||
| 7 | n/a | Not an office | ||
| 8 | n/a | Not an office | ||
| 9 | n/a | Not a retail outlet | ||
| 10 | n/a | Not a retail outlet | ||
| 11 | n/a | Not tourism related | ||
| 12 | n/a | Not tourism related | ||
| 13 | n/a | Not tourism related | ||
| 14 | n/a | Not tourism related | ||
| 15 | n/a | Not tourism related | ||
| Recreation | ALL | n/a | No Recreational activities on site | |
| Community | ALL | n/a | No Community activities on site | |
| Transport | ALL | n/a | No change required to Transport network | |
| Minerals | 1 | n/a | No mineral extraction or working involved | |
| Energy | 1 | n/a | No energy provision involved | |
| 2 | Yes | Land protected 9m from overhead cables | ||
| 3 | n/a | Not a Heritage site | ||
| 4 | n/a | No energy provision involved | ||
| 5 | n/a | No buildings on site | ||
| 1 (a) | Yes | Waste Management Policy defines need for landfill | |
| 1 (b) | Yes | No unacceptable adverse impact on residents | |
| 1 (c) | No adverse effect on the following: | ||
| i | Yes | Landscapes, geology/geomorphology, or features of special interest or attraction | |
| ii | n/a | Ancient Monuments/settings (none near) | |
| iii | n/a | Registered Buildings or their settings, or features of architectural importance (none near) | |
| iv | n/a | Character or appearance of Conservation Areas (not near any Conservation area) | |
| v | n/a | Sites of archaeological interest (none near) | |
| vi | Yes | Sites containing inter/nationally important species | |
| vii | Yes | Land drainage and water courses | |
| viii | n/a | Woodland or timber resources (none near) | |
| ix | n/a | Designated National Heritage sites.(none near) | |
| 1(d) | Yes | Acceptable for access and highway safety | |
| 1(e) | Yes | Phased scheme of restoration and landscaping | |
| 1(f) | Yes | No sterilisation of other mineral deposits | |
| 1(g) | Yes | No unacceptable adverse impact on airport safety |
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown