11 July 2014 · Planning Committee
Tesco Stores Ltd, Lake Road, Douglas, Isle Of Man, IM1 5af
The proposal involved erecting a 9m x 6m x 4m high detached building with shallow pitched roof in the Tesco car park on Lake Road, Douglas, for selling seasonal items like summer toys, garden furniture, BBQs, plants, camping gear, beach towels, TT merchandise, and Christmas goods.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The Committee determined the Tesco site is outside Douglas town centre, creating a presumption against additional retail development per the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2007.
All new retail development (excepting neighbourhood shops and those instances identified in Business Policy 5) sited within the town and village centr
Requires all new retail development (except neighbourhood shops or Business Policy 5 instances) to be sited within town and village centres on zoned land. Officer assessed site as out-of-centre (800m from prime shopping area per prior Inspector), despite Retail Warehousing zoning and Central Area Boundary, leading to policy conflict.
new retail provision at a scale appropriate. Major retail development proposals to be supported by Retail Impact Assessment
Supports new retail in existing retail areas at appropriate scale without adverse effect on adjacent areas; major proposals need Retail Impact Assessment. Officer found RIA showed no material impact but Committee saw precedent risk undermining town centre investment.
Business Policy 10
Permits retail development only in established town/village centres, except neighbourhood shops or Business Policy 5. Directly conflicted as site not in defined centre; RIA did not override sequential test.
General Policy 2
Permits development compliant with Area Plan zoning and listed criteria (siting, scale, amenity, highways, etc.). Building found in keeping with functional car park character and negligible parking impact, but overall refused on retail policy grounds.
Transport Policy 7
Requires no adverse effect on parking or traffic. Refusal cited insufficient evidence that loss of 4 spaces or traffic would not harm onsite parking.
