APL Manx Bat Group Survey

Waterfall Hotel, Glen Maye; Report on a bat survey w.r.t. PA 23/01029/B.<br><br>- report commissioned by Mr D Reid, Fraser Reid Design Limited, by email on 18th July 2024<br><br>

Report compiled 05/08/2024

Quality Assurance

The author holds a Manx Bat License, previously held a UK Bat Roost Visitor’s License and has 40 years experience studying bats in both the Isle of Man and the United Kingdom.

This report has been prepared following the Bat Conservation Trust’s guidelines contained in Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good Practice Guidelines (4th ed). However, night vision equipment was not used on this survey as visibility was sufficient to observe emerging bats for up to an hour after sunset.

CONTENTS	CONTENTS
Summary	2
Introduction	2
Methods	2
Results	2
Evaluation	4
Impact Assessment	4
Caveats	4
Appendix I: Mitigations	4

Summary

No bats were seen to emerge from the property during a one-hour emergence watch and only two potential roost features were noted, in the form of a missing slate and some raised slates, which offered only limited access.

Introduction: A bat survey was required as a condition of approval of PA 23/01029/B. Methods:

Three members of the Manx Bat Group attended on the evening of 1st August 2024 to inspect the property and assess its suitability for roosting bats. An emergence watch was conducted for one hour from sunset.

Results:

The building (Photo A) is rendered and painted with no visible cracks in any walls and no potential access points behind soffits.

The windows and doors on the front elevation and west gable (Photo B) are all relatively new with the frames well sealed. The windows and door on the east gable external extension (Photo C) are not quite so new but are also well sealed with no external gaps.

The building is in two parts, visible in the roof. The western half has the older-looking roof in slightly poorer condition. There is a missing slate below the central chimney (Photo D) and gaps between some raised slates at the western end (Photo E). Velux windows shows there to be an attic conversion in this part of the building. The ridge tiles are well seated.

The roof of the eastern half is in much better condition with no slipped or missing slates. The rear roof descends to a cat slide roof over a rear extension. The slates here are modern cement slates and are all in good condition as are the ridge tiles. The extension reaches to the rear overgrown garden rendering the eaves un-viewable

Photo C: East elevation Photo D: Missing and raised slates Photo E: Raised and uneven slates Photo F: Cat on rear roof

A street-level photograph of a white, two-story building identified as 'The Waterfall Inn Country Pub' situated in a rural setting.

A photograph of a two-story white rendered building on Shore Road, appearing to be a former inn or commercial property with a low boundary wall.

A photograph of a white, single-story detached building with prominent chimney stacks and overgrown vegetation in the foreground.

A close-up photograph of a building corner showing a slate roof, white rendered wall, and gutter, with a bird flying in the sky above.

A close-up photograph of a building's roofline featuring slate tiles, a gutter, downpipe, and a television aerial against a grey sky.

A photograph showing the roofline and chimneys of a white building with a black cat perched on the slate roof, surrounded by trees and vegetation.

During the emergence watch no bats were seen to emerge from the building and only four bats were recorded on the detectors, a Leisler’s bat at 16 minutes past sunset and three common pipistrelles at 26, 32 and 50 minutes past sunset. A cat was seen to have climbed up onto the rear roof (Photo F).

Evaluation

The building has been empty for some time which would make less suitable for those species of bats which like warmth. There is very limited access to only two parts of the roof, in a position where access could only be gained to any space between the slates and roofing felt. Access to the rear of the property is rendered unusable by the growth of trees and shrubs right up to the rear wall. The presence of a cat on the rear roof would argue against a bat roost in this part of the building.

Bats will switch roosts from time to time so the absence of any emerging at one particular time does not prove that there is no roost there at other times. However, the building is judged to be unsuitable for bats owing to the absence of many potential roost features.

Impact Assessment Demolition of the property will not impact the local populations of bats in any way. No mitigation is required for bats although provision for bats in the replacement buildings would support the aims of Biodiversity Net Gain (see Appendix I). Caveats

Apart from maternity roosts, bats can be found individually or in low numbers in buildings for a variety of reasons, depending on the season, from hibernating, night shelter, mating or occasional roosts. Sometimes such roosts are occupied opportunistically and cannot be predicted in advance. If a bat is found in the course of the development then work should cease and advice sought from DEFA Biodiversity officers.

Appendix I: Recommendations

Bat Boxes On new dwellings integrated bat boxes are now favoured and the UK Bat Conservation Trust has recently announced one model as one of their Partnership products: https://www.bats.org.uk/ourwork/buildings-planning-and-development/roost-replacement-and-enhancement/partnerships However, others are available from the larger building materials suppliers or from NHBS.com. Housing developers in other parts of the island are now providing one bat integrated bat box per dwelling which would aid roost switching to which common pipistrelles and Leisler’s bats are prone.

Lighting External lighting installed as part of the development should be kept to a minimum where possible in order to avoid disturbing bats foraging or passing through the site. The Institute of Lighting Professionals and Bat Conservation Trust Guidance Note 08/18 on Bats and Artificial Lighting in the UK recommend measures such as:

 using LED luminaires due to their sharp cut-off, lower intensity, good colour rendition and dimming capability,
 using warm white spectrum lights (ideally <2700 kelvin) to reduce blue light component,
 peak wavelengths higher than 550nm to avoid the component of light most disturbing to bats,
 setting external security lighting on motion sensors and short timers,

 luminaires should lack UV elements when manufactured,
 avoiding uplighting,
 avoiding use of metal halide, ﬂuorescent sources.

Timing of works Demolition should ideally commence outside the hibernation season (November to March) so that should any bat have chosen to take up residence it would be active enough to find alternative residence.

N J Pinder, BSc., MSc. Recorder, Manx Bat Group 05/08/2024

APL Manx Bat Group Survey

Source & Provenance