Loading document...
Application No.: 24/00525/B Applicant: Mr & Mrs Stanley Corlett Proposal: Alterations and erection an extension to side elevation of dwelling Site Address: Croit A Curleod Ballacaley Road Sulby Isle Of Man IM7 2HS Principal Planner: Chris Balmer Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 21.06.2024
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
Reason: to ensure adequate flood mitigation measures are in place given the sites locations within a high flood risk area.
Overall, the extension and roofing works would have no significant impact to residential or public amenity sufficient to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawing all received on 16.05.2024. _______________________________________________________________
Additional Persons
It is recommended that the following Government Departments should be given Interested Person Status on the basis that they have made written submissions these do relate to planning considerations:
Flood Management Division (DOI) _____________________________________________________________________________
1.0 SITE - 1.1 The application site represents the curtilage of an existing property Croit A Curleod, Ballacaley Road, Sulby which is a detached dormer bungalow dwelling, with gardens to the side and rear of the property. Off road parking front the property and access directly onto the Ballacaley Road which is to the south of the site.
2.0 PLANNING POLICIES - 2.1 In terms of local plan policy, the application site is within an area recognised as being within a "predominately residential use" under the Sulby Local Plan 1999. The site is not within a Conservation Area. - 2.2 General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan is considered applicable, which states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
3.1 The following previous planning application is considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application; - 3.2 Reserved matters application to erect a detached dwelling with integral garage 08/00740/REM - APPROVED - 3.3 Approval in principle to erect a detached dwelling - 07/00180/A - APPROVED
4.1 The application seeks approval for the Alterations and erection an extension to side elevation of dwelling. - 4.2 The single storey extension would be located to the western gable end of the property having a depth of 7m, a width of 4.2m. The extension would be finished with painted render and a roof finish to match the main dwelling. - 4.3 The proposal also seek approval for the replacement of the existing roof and dormers of the main dwelling from red/orange Rosemary clay tiles to a natural dark blue/grey roofing slates. The new extension will match whatever the main dwelling finish is.
5.1 Highway Services comment there are no highway implications (24.05.2024).
5.2 Lezayre Parish Commissioner's recommend an approval and make the following comments (14.06.2024): "The Commissioners note, however, that a second entrance from the road to the dwelling was put in to the west side of the property some time ago without planning permission being sought. The Commissioners believe the property should have only one entrance in accordance with the original planning permission." - 5.3 Flood Risk Management Division comment (29.05.2024): "This property is subject to surface water flooding" and "Condition the mitigation measures in the flood risk assessment".
6.1 The key issues relate to the potential visual impact upon the street scene and potential impact upon neighbouring amenities. Potential visual impact upon the street scene
6.2 The proposed extension in terms of its design, size, proportion, position and finishes are in keeping with the existing property. Accordingly, from these respects the proposals would comply with General Policy 2 and the RDG. A condition should be attached to require the finish of the roof of the extension should match that of the main dwelling, whether that be Rosemary clay tiles or a natural dark blue/grey roofing slate. Potential impact upon neighbouring amenities - 6.3 Given the location and size of the extension and its distance from any neighbouring properties the proposal would have no significant adverse impacts upon neighbouring amenities to warrant a refusal and comply with General Policy 2 and the RDG.
7.1 Overall, the extension would have no significant impacts to residential amenities nor public amenities to warrant a refusal. It is considered the proposal would comply with the relevant policies of the Isle Of Man Strategic Plan 2016 and the Residential Design Guide 2021 and therefore it is recommended that the application be approved. - 8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS
8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
8.2 The decision maker must determine:
8.3 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given Interested Person Status.
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status.
Decision Made : Permitted Date: 21.06.2024 Determining officer Signed : J SINGLETON Jason Singleton Principal Planner
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown