8 February 2016 · Director of Planning and Building Control (Michael Gallagher)
Field 320653, Main Road, Crosby, Isle Of Man, IM4 2ee
This decision was appealedAP16/0006
Appeal dismissed
This decision was appealedAP17/0058
Appeal dismissed
This decision was appealedAP17/0056
Appeal split
This decision was appealedAP18/0029
Appeal dismissed
This decision was appealedAP18/0030
Appeal allowed
The proposal seeks approval in principle for 28 two-storey dwellings (3-4 bedrooms, semi-detached, detached or terraced for affordable plots) plus retail space (approx 450 sqm footprint), parking for 38 vehicles, bus layby, pedestrian crossing, and footpath link to the Heritage Trail on a sloping 1.5ha field fronting t…
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer emphasized reliance on the 1982 Development Plan's residential designation, stating 'in order for a planning system to be robust and dependable, there must be some reliance upon the design…
General Policy 2
Requires development in zoning to respect site/surroundings (siting/layout/scale), not adversely affect landscape/amenity/highway safety/services/flood risk, incorporate topography/trees, provide amenities/access/parking. Officer assessed proposal complies overall; distances (35m to nearest dwellings), landscaping mitigate impacts; design/appearance reserved but GP2 to apply then.
Strategic Policy 4
Villages like Crosby: development maintains character, appropriate scale for local housing/employment. Site fits as village infill on designated land.
Spatial Policy 5
New development in defined settlements; countryside only per GP3. Site within Crosby settlement boundary per 1982 Plan.
Housing Policy 5
25% affordable housing for 8+ dwellings on residential land. Proposal provides 7/28 affordable units on plots 1-7.
Recreation Policy 3
Residential 10+ dwellings: amenity space per Appendix 6 (2688sqm required; 3149sqm provided in two areas).
Recreation Policy 4
Open space on-site/close, foot/public transport accessible. Provided adjacent to playing fields via Heritage Trail link.
new retail provision at a scale appropriate. Major retail development proposals to be supported by Retail Impact Assessment
Retail in existing areas appropriate scale, no adverse effect; major >500sqm needs RIA. 450sqm < threshold, no adjacent retail impact.
Business Policy 10
Retail in town/village centres or neighbourhood shops in large residential areas. Acceptable as neighbourhood in village residential designation.
Transport Policy 1
Locate near public transport. Proposal includes bus layby/stop, near routes.
Transport Policy 2
Provision for bus/pedestrian/cycle routes linking existing. Includes layby, crossing, Heritage Trail link.
Transport Policy 6 - Equal weight for vehicles and pedestrians
Pedestrian needs equal weight. Puffin crossing, footpaths provided.
Transport Policy 8
Major development Transport Assessment. Provided and accepted.
Time limit
The development hereby approved shall be begun either before the expiration of four years from the date of this approval or before the expiration of two years from the date of approval of the last of the reserved matters.
Reserved matters application time limit
Application for approval of the reserved matters shall be made to the Department before the expiration of two years from the date of this approval and thereafter the development shall only be carried out in accordance with the details as approved.
Reserved matters approval
Approval of the details of design, external appearance of the buildings, internal layout, landscaping of the site (hereinafter called "the reserved matters") shall be obtained from the Department in writing before any development is commenced.
Additional reserved matters details
In addition to the matters referred to in condition 3 above, the application(s) for reserved matters must also provide: a) flood risk assessment; b) foul/surface water drainage; c) lighting details re bats/trees; d) bat surveys; e) visibility splays 2.4m x 70m; f) pedestrian crossing/bus layby/highway drainage; h) pedestrian link surface/drainage.
Access prior to works
No other work may commence on site until such times as the access into the site from the A1 together with the visibility splays as approved have been provided in accordance with the approved plans and retained as such thereafter.
Landscaping implementation
All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details of landscaping must be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the completion of the development or the occupation of the dwellings, whichever is the sooner. Any trees or plants which within a period of five years from the completion of the development die, are removed, or become seriously damaged or diseased must be replaced in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species.
Occupation after infrastructure
None of the dwellings hereby approved nor the commercial unit(s) may be occupied until such times as the bus lay-by and pedestrian crossing approved as part of this application are in place and available for use.
No objection subject to reserved matters on visibility splays (2.4m x 70m), parking, turning, drainage, pedestrian access, bus layby, puffin crossing
Satisfied at this stage; Flood Risk Assessment at detailed stage; surface water attenuated to agricultural run-off to river
Well placed for affordable housing demand; 25% (7 units) required
Supports scheme; benefits from bus layby and shop/post office
Need for affordable/first-time buyer housing, local shop/post office/chemist, bus layby/crossing improves safety/convenience; benefits village
Multiple consultees provided responses on PA 15/00775/A, with Manx Utilities satisfied at in-principle stage subject to detailed FRA, DEFA Fisheries and Biodiversity raising aquatic ecology concerns, Isle of Man Constabulary recommending crime prevention measures, Manx National H…
Key concern: Development area exceeds 1982 Plan zoning
Manx Utilities
Conditional No ObjectionManx Utilities is happy with the proposed development on the site and with the information provided at in principle stage; Manx Utilities will ask for a FRA at the detailed application stage and therefore are satisfied with the current level of information provided; The initial FRA should look at level and capacity of the stream for a 1 in 100 plus climate change event
Conditions requested: Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) required at detailed application stage; Surface water from the site is to be attenuated to equivalent agricultural runoff and discharged to the river
DEFA Fisheries
Conditional No ObjectionDEFA Fisheries will comment separately on each application associated with this staged development; adopt a precautionary approach and ensure that development takes place in a manner that protects the whole stream ecosystem
Conditions requested: Development takes place in a manner that protects the whole stream ecosystem; Ensure run-off containing sediment or building waste does not contaminate the stream; Physical nature of the stream bed should not be altered; Removal of natural bankside vegetation kept to a minimum; Lighting design should ensure illumination of the stream at night is kept to a minimum
DEFA Fisheries
Conditional No ObjectionDEFA Fisheries have no objection in principal to this development, but there are some concerns regarding the potential impact on fish populations
Conditions requested: Works disturbing watercourse or banks conducted July to September inclusive; Complete Development within 9m of Watercourse form at detailed stage; Method statements agreed in advance with Fisheries prior to works
Isle of Man Constabulary
Conditional No ObjectionCrime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED); principles in relation to CPTED which include anonymity and surveillance
Conditions requested: Emergency road should not continue to Heritage Trail; Lower overgrown boundary hedging removing hiding points; Specify height of sod bank and close mesh wire fencing to prevent climbing; Use spiny or thorny shrubs for perimeter security
Manx National Heritage
Conditional No ObjectionMNH is not against the principle of new housing here; provision of a footpath route from the development to the Heritage Trail along the former railway line is to be welcomed
Conditions requested: Conditions to trap and remove pollutants from drainage system; Protect semi-natural habitats along Heritage Trail from flood/drainage mitigation impacts; Alternative solution for emergency access if necessary
DEFA Biodiversity
Conditional No ObjectionThe Heritage Trail verges were recorded as unimproved grassland in 1992 of conservation interest
Conditions requested: Provide crossing points but retain open ditch; Protect wetter lower area west of path; Minimise effects on Trail verges unless removing alien species; Bat survey required; Design to avoid negative effects on bats
Marown Parish Commissioners
ObjectionThe Commissioners have no objection to the principle of Residential Development on this site. However, they note with concern that the area marked for this project is significantly larger than that detailed in the 1982 Plan
Conditions requested: Traffic regulation 'no waiting at any time' opposite and adjacent to entrance
Marown Parish Commissioners
ObjectionThe Commissioners have no objection to the principle of Residential Development on this site
Conditions requested: Traffic regulation 'no waiting at any time' opposite and adjacent to entrance
The original application sought approval in principle for 28 dwellings (including affordable units) and 418m² retail space on land partially designated residential in the 1982 Plan, approved by the Planning Committee on 30 November 2015 subject to a legal agreement, with decision notice issued 8 February 2016. Appellants argued the site exceeded the zoned area, was de-zoned by Planning Circular 8/91 due to flooding and access issues, omitted from Residential Land Availability Study Update 7, would harm highway safety on the A1 TT course, trees, wildlife (bats), flood risk, and landscape. The inspector found the 1982 Plan designation carried determinative weight, gave negligible/moderate weight to contrary material considerations, accepted highway improvements (access, crossing, lay-by), no significant flood risk per assessment, tree loss mitigable by replanting, wildlife protectable by conditions, and visual impact acceptable as 'rounding off' in village. Appeals dismissed on 8 June 2016, upholding approval with refined conditions.
Precedent Value
Old plan designations retain strong weight absent formal rescission; technical assessments by consultants (FRA, transport) and authority support can overcome local objections; AiP conditions effectively defer detailed ecology/flooding/tree issues; village 'rounding off' on edge sites acceptable if policy-compliant.
Inspector: Ruth V MacKenzie BA(Hons) MRTPI