20 September 2011 · Minister for Infrastructure (on appeal, following inspector report)
Tudor Lodge, 18, Stanley Terrace, Douglas, Isle Of Man, IM2 4ep
Pearl Healthcare Ltd proposed converting a detached rear garage into two en-suite bedrooms, adding a single storey extension linking it to the main care home building with a laundry room, day room, and corridor.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The initial officer recommendation and delegated refusal by the Development Control Manager focused on the poor outlook from the proposed bedrooms, which would face directly onto narrow Stanley Place …
General Policy 2
Requires development to provide satisfactory amenity standards including outlook from principal rooms. Officer found bedrooms' outlook onto narrow Stanley Place poor and susceptible to disturbance, failing part (h); inspector found it acceptable given context, lighting, and care home use.
Environment Policy 35
Protects Conservation Area character. Single storey rear extension and garage window replacement deemed unlikely to cause unacceptable impacts.
Community Policy 6
Permits care home extensions if no unacceptable highway impact or effect on residential amenity/character. Highway concerns overruled; no over-concentration found.
Housing Policy 17
For flat conversions requiring pleasant outlook; officer applied by analogy to care home bedrooms but noted not directly applicable; inspector did not rely on it.
Time limit
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of 4 years from the date of this notice.
Approved drawings
This approval relates to alterations, conversion of garage and erection of a single storey extension to provide additional living accommodation at Tudor Lodge Residential Care Home, 18 Stanley Terrace, Douglas, as shown on Drawings numbered AT 785.1 rev 1 and AT 785.2 rev 2 which are stamped as having been received by the Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Building Control Division, on 12 August 2011.
no objection
requested to be kept informed of the outcome
The original application for alterations, garage conversion to bedrooms, and a single storey extension at Tudor Lodge Residential Care Home was refused primarily due to concerns over amenity standards for the proposed bedrooms and potential parking/highway impacts. The appellant argued the development met community needs, garage was unused for parking, amenity was adequate given communal facilities, and it complied with Strategic Plan policies. The inspector found no significant highway harm, accepted the bedrooms provided satisfactory amenity considering prior approval and resident access to communal spaces, and noted the evident need for additional care places. The appeal was allowed, reversing the refusal, with approval subject to standard time limit and drawing conditions.
Precedent Value
This appeal shows inspectors will prioritise evidenced need for community care facilities and practical site constraints over theoretical amenity/parking losses, especially where prior approvals exist and policies are met. Future applicants should provide robust usage history and operational details to rebut highway/amenity objections.
Inspector: Stephen Amos MA (Cantab) MCD MRTPI
