Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
25/90990/B
Page 1 of 5
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 25/90990/B Applicant : Mr Steven Wilkinson Proposal : Re-roofing (retrospective), re-rending of exterior walls, installation roof lights and new windows and doors, alteration to kitchen window, demolition of outbuilding to create of off-road parking (in association with 25/00991/CON) Site Address : Woodbank 23 Albany Road Douglas Isle Of Man IM2 3NF
Planning Officer: Vanessa Porter Photo Taken :
Site Visit : Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 19.02.2026 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. The proposal is deemed acceptable in terms of their form, mass and design which preserves the overall Conservation Area, and as such complies with Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999) and Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This decision relates to the following plans and drawings, date stamped received on 7th November 2025; o Covering Letter o Drawing No. 01 o Drawing No. 02 o Drawing No. 03
__
==== PAGE 2 ====
25/90990/B
Page 2 of 5
Right to Appeal
It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: DOI Highway Services - No objection Douglas City Council - No objection __
Officer’s Report
THE APPLICATION SITE 1.1 The application site is to the rear of the residential curtilage of "Woodbank," No. 23 Albany Road, Douglas which is a two storey end of terrace property situated to the South West of Albany Road. To the North of the site is an access to the rear lane. 1.2 The rear of the property is a rear land which splits and has two routes, one which goes along the rear of the terrace of properties and meets Selborne Drive, this rear lane is called Colden Lane, this lane then splits off and goes along the rear of the properties to the South West of the property along Selborne Drive and meets Tennis Road. Directly to the rear of the property are several garages. 1.3 During the officers site visit, it was noted that the property had scaffolding surrounding it.
THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The current planning application seeks approval for the following but not limited to items;
PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 There are no previous applications which are relevant to the assessment of this application but there is one concurrent application which is relevant, PA25/00991/CON, which is for, "Demolition of outbuilding to create off road parking (in association with 25/90990/B)," which is currently pending.
PLANNING POLICY 4.1 The site lies within an area zoned as Predominantly Residential on the Area Plan for the East, Map 4 - Douglas. The site is situated within a Conservation Area but not a Flood Risk Zone. 4.2 Given the nature of the of the land designation and the property being within a Conservation Area, Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act (1999) is the most relevant in the assessment of this application. Followed by paragraph 7.29.2, Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, which set out development in Conservation Areas will only be permitted where they preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the area and Planning Policy Statement 1/98 - The Alteration and Replacement of Windows.
==== PAGE 3 ====
25/90990/B
Page 3 of 5
4.3 Also relevant tis the Residential Design Guide (2021) which offers advice on the design and in relation to visual impact and the impact on neighbours.
REPRESENTATIONS 5.1 The following representations can be seen online in full below is a short summary; 5.2 Highway Services have considered the application and state, "After reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the off-street parking dimensions are acceptable and the off-street parking is accessed off a relatively low speed road. The minor visibility achieved for the parking is outweighed by the benefits of removing parking demand on the street and low risk of safety due to the low speed nature of the service road." (18.11.25) 5.3 Douglas City Council have considered the proposal and state, "no objection." (25.11.25)
ASSESSMENT 6.1 The main issues to consider in the assessment of this planning application are:
6.3 NEIGHBOURING AMENITY 6.3.1 Turning towards neighbouring amenity, there are no additional windows nor extensions being proposed within the proposal which could impact the neighbouring amenity of the surrounding properties. 6.3.2 It's noted that the proposal includes the alteration to the rear walling which is directly adjacent to the neighbouring property to create a parking area, whilst the location plan provided by the agent gives the assumption that the neighbouring property has it's own
==== PAGE 4 ====
25/90990/B
Page 4 of 5
opening in the rear, this was not seen during the officers site visit. It's also noted that there is not a dividing wall between the properties and there is a boundary fence instead. 6.3.3 With the above in mind, the creation of a parking area is unlikely to impact the neighbouring property above and beyond what is currently in place, as such the proposal is deemed to be acceptable from this point of view with there not being any concerns which would warrant refusal.
6.4 HIGHWAY SAFETY 6.4.1 Turning towards whether the proposal would have an impact on Highway Safety, it's noted that Highway Services have considered the application and state that they have no impact with the "minor visibility achieved for the parking is outweighed by the benefits of removing parking demand on the street and low risk of safety due to the low speed nature of the service road." 6.4.2 With the above in mind, when taking on the comments raised by Highway Services, who are the professional with regards to Highway Safety, the proposal is deemed acceptable from this point of view.
CONCLUSION 7.1 The proposal is deemed acceptable in terms of their form, mass and design which preserves the overall Conservation Area, and as such complies with Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999) and Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016.
RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE 8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted). 8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to: o applicant (in all cases); o a Local Authority; Government Department; Manx Utilities; and Manx National Heritage that submit a relevant objection; and o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria. 8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. 8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required): o any appellant or potential appellant (which includes the applicant); o the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, the Department of Infrastructure and the local authority for the area; o any other person who has submitted written representations (this can include other Government Departments and Local Authorities); and o in the case of a petition, a single representative.
==== PAGE 5 ====
25/90990/B
Page 5 of 5
__
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted
Date: 25.02.2026
Determining Officer Signed : J SINGLETON
Jason Singleton
Principal Planner
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal