Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
25/90917/B
Page 1 of 3
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 25/90917/B Applicant : Mr John Shakespear Proposal : Replacement of existing ground floor communal entrance door Site Address : Mariners Wharf Apartments Harbour View East Quay Peel IM5 1AR
Principal Planner: Chris Balmer Photo Taken :
Site Visit :
Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 05.12.2025 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. The proposed replacement door is deemed acceptable in terms of its form, mass and design which preserves the overall Conservation Area and as such complies with Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999) and Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawing all received on 05.11.2025.
__
Right to Appeal
None __
==== PAGE 2 ====
25/90917/B
Page 2 of 3
Officer’s Report
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE 1.1 The application site is the curtilage of Mariners Wharf Apartments, Harbour View, East Quay, Peel, which is a apartment block located on the eastern side of East Quay, to the east of the Peel Marina/Harbour.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The current planning application seeks approval for the replacement of existing ground floor communal entrance door. The existing glazed sliding door would be replaced with an inward opening door and a side window. The door is located centrally within the apartment complex at ground floor level.
3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 The previous applications are not relevant in the assessment of this application.
4.0 PLANNING POLICY 4.1 The site lies within an area zoned as "Mixed Use" under the Peel Local Plan 1989. The site is within a Flood Risk Zone (Tidal, Fluvial & Surface Water) and is also within a Conservation Area.
4.2 Given the nature of the of the land designation and the property being within a Conservation Area, Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act (1999) is the most relevant in the assessment of this application. Followed by paragraph 7.29.2 and Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, which set out development in Conservation Areas will only be permitted where they preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the area.
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS 5.1 None
6.0 ASSESSMENT 6.1 Due to the proposed works being situated in a Conservation Area it is necessary to test the application under Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999), Environment Policy 35 and General Policy 2 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016.
6.2 The location of the door mean that they are likely only viewable by occupants of the apartment complex and even then minimally. Arguably the door in question is a more traditional feature and more in keeping that the existing glazed sliding door. Accordingly, the proposed replacement door will not impact the Conservation Area, and would preserve the character and quality of the area and therefore comply with Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999). Furthermore, in relation to Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016, the proposal by preserving the Conservation Area is considered to comply with this policy also.
7.0 CONCLUSION 7.1 The proposed replacement door is deemed acceptable in terms of its form, mass and design which preserves the overall Conservation Area and as such complies with Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Act (1999) and Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016.
8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal
==== PAGE 3 ====
25/90917/B
Page 3 of 3
(i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to: o applicant (in all cases); o a Local Authority; Government Department; Manx Utilities; and Manx National Heritage that submit a relevant objection; and o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria.
8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10.
8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required): o any appellant or potential appellant (which includes the applicant); o the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, the Department of Infrastructure and the local authority for the area; o any other person who has submitted written representations (this can include other Government Departments and Local Authorities); and o in the case of a petition, a single representative.
8.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.
__
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted
Date: 11.12.2025
Determining Officer
Signed : J SINGLETON
Jason Singleton
Principal Planner
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/ customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal