Loading document...
Department of Local Government and the Environment Planning and Building Control Directorate
Planning Section Tel 01624 685950 Murray House Fax 01624 686443 Mount Havelock For official use only Douglas IOM IM1 2SF Date Receipt Number 714143
The Town and Country Planning Act 1999 The Town and Country (Development Procedure) Order 2005
Please type or use block capitals. The person here below named as the applicant is responsible for payment of the appropriate fee. All relevant questions on this form must be answered. Guidance notes are available on request.
| 1 | Is this application for: | Please tick as appropriate. | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | a) Approval in principle; | | ☐ RECEIVED 04 | | | | b) Full approval for development involving building or engineering operations; | | ☑ 16 SEP 2008 | | | | c) Change of use of land not involving building or engineering operations; | | ☐ | | | | d) Approval of matters reserved from a previous approval. If yes please provide the reference number of the relevant application; | | ☑ S/NO | Ref No | | | e) Development within a Conservation Area. If yes please include details of any demolition involved; | | | ☑ S/NO | | | f) Works proposed to a registered building. If yes, please quote the RB number and complete an application for Registered Building consent Form RBAP; | | ☑ S/NO | RB No | | | g) Retrospect activities OR as a result of an Enforcement enquiry? If yes please quote reference. | | ☑ S/NO | Enf No | | | Relevant FEE ENCLOSED (if appropriate) Where a site or floor area has been used to establish the fee please note that area. Cheques should be made payable to the IOM Government. | £ 1,200 | | Area 1.04ha | | 2 | Address or description of the site to be developed. | | Earystane Quarry Earystane Plantation Colby | | | 3 | Local Authority District. | | Arbory | | | 4 | a) Full name of applicant. | | Earystone Ltd | | | | b) Address of applicant. | | New Hey Grove Mount | | | | Telephone number | | RAMSEY 01624 897396 | | | | | | | Home |
5 a) Full name of agent
b) Address of agent
Telephone number
c) If using an Agent, please indicate if the Agent is to be issued with the acknowledgement letter, certificate site notice and undertake responsibility for affixing it at the development site. PLEASE NOTE If this box is not completed all correspondence will be directed to the Agent.
Dalgleish Associates Ltd
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | 6 | Applicant's interest in the site. (e.g. owner, tenant, potential purchaser) | Tenant | | 7 | Name and address of: | Isle of Man Water Authority | | | a) The site owner, if different from the applicant. | Tromode Road | | | | DOUGLAS | | | | IM2 5PA | | | b) The occupier or tenant of the site if different from above. | Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry | | | c) Has the owner given consent for this application? Certificate P2 (A2 for adverts), issued on validation of the application, must be signed and returned before an application can be determined. | YES/NO | | | d) Does the applicant own or control any additional land within the vicinity of the application. | YES/NO | | | If YES you should outline the additional land in blue on the site plan. | |
8 Description of the proposed development. Please state clearly what you propose to do.
Extension to Earystane Quarry and final restoration
9 a) What is the existing use of the site? (e.g residential, office, retail etc.) b) What is the proposed use of the site?
Extractive Industry/Forestry Plantation
Extractive Industry
10 Details, if known, of any previous planning applications.
Ref. No. 99/0290
11 Would the proposed development involve the creation of, or alteration to, a vehicular or pedestrian access to any highway? If YES please provide details. Have you consulted with the Highway Authority?
YAS/NO YAS/NO
12 Would the proposed development require a new or amended supply of;
a) Gas
b) Electricity
c) Water
d) Telecommunications
e) Water
f) Telecommunications
To assess any impact on these utilities, the applicant MUST apply directly to the provider to establish the location of existing services and whether any affect may be caused by the proposed development or works.
Form PA1.5
e) Please give details of the nature of the required supply if other than for a single domestic user.
N/A
| 13 | a) How would rainwater run-off from roofs and paved surfaces be disposed of? | N/A | | --- | --- | --- | | | b) How would foul sewage from the proposed development be disposed of? | N/A | | | c) If a septic tank is proposed, please arrange for the excavation of a trial hole, approximately 1.2m deep, on the site thereof, and give details of when and where this may be inspected. | N/A |
14 If the proposed development would create additional industrial, retail or office floor space, please give details of the respective areas in square metres.
N/A
| 15 | a) Are there any trees on or overhanging the site? | YES/NO | | --- | --- | --- | | | If yes have you consulted with DAFF? | YES | | | b) Has an accurate survey been included illustrating the position of existing trees and their approximate canopy spread in relation to the proposed works? Note: if there are trees on the site which are likely to be affected by the proposed works, any decision on the application is likely to be delayed until such a survey has been submitted. | N/A | | | c) Would the proposed building or engineering operations encroach into an area demarcated as the canopy spread? | N/A | | | d) Would any trees be planted as part of the development? | YES/NO |
16 Please give details of any other information relevant to the application. Note: should you continue onto a separate sheet, each application copy must be accompanied by a copy of the continuation sheet
This Application is accompanied by a Planning and Environmental Statement
Have you been provided with Pre application advice from the Area Development Control Officer? YES/NO
If yes Officer's name Sarah Corlett
| | BUILDING REGULATIONS | | | --- | --- | --- | | 17 | a) Are you making a concurrent application for Building Regulations Approval? | YES/NO | | | b) If yes, please underline to which Authority your application has been submitted. | DoLGE Douglas Corporation Onchan District Commissioners Peel Town Commissioners | | | c) The date of submission | N/A | | | d) Building Regulations reference number (if known). | N/A |
Form PA1.5
18 Statement
I hereby enclose four copies (three for windows) of: • this application form • and all supporting plans and attachments which must include*
A Site Location Plan, a current up to date plan in order to identify the property (these can be purchased from the Planning & Building Control Directorate), indicating the site of the proposed works outlined in red, with a blue outline showing the extent of any additional land ownership.
A Site Plan showing the boundaries outlined in red of the curtilage of the building or the building as extended, and its relationship to adjoining boundaries (including written dimensions from each side of the building to it's relevant boundary), and the size, position and use of every other building or proposed building within that curtilage.
An Application check list - Form PL.1
Please Note: The site indicator must be a continuous, unbroken red line delineating the exact footprint of the site proposed.
A copy of this application will be forwarded to the Local Authority of the District, and Network Planning Officer, Department of Transport.
To the best of my knowledge and belief all the information given in this application is true, and the documents provided herewith are accurate.
Dated 16th September 2008 Signature of applicant or agent
If signing on behalf of a company, please clearly state relationship
If signing on behalf of a company, please clearly state relationship
Should this application be unsupported by adequate and clear site maps and plans outlining all the works proposed the Department retains the right to refuse acceptance and return the application.
19 SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS Please detail the drawing or reference number and/or date of all plans submitted in support of this application. Should any plans be missing, the application will be considered incomplete. Please continue on a separate sheet if necessary.
PLAN Location plan - Site plan - Check list Form PL.1 Please refer to attached schedule for all plans
NOTE: NO WORKS MAY BE COMMENCED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS- a) On receipt of the Initial Decision Notice the time period for requesting an appeal has expired and no such appeal has been requested: or b) Any Appeal has been completed
To: The Secretary of the Planning Committee Department of Local Government and the Environment Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas IM1 2SF
Form PA1.5
Client Reference: 372
Prepared For: EARYSTONE LTD
Danglesh Associates Ltd
Dane 12 { }^{\text {th }} September 2008
Dalgleish Associates Ltd Mineral, Planning and Environmental Consultants Cathedral Square Dunblane FK15 OAH Tel: 01786822339 Fax: 01786822899
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ..... 1 1.1 The Proposal ..... 1 1.2 Environmental Impact Assessment ..... 1 1.3 Environmental Statement ..... 1 2 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT ..... 2 2.1 History of the Site ..... 2 2.2 Site Location, Description, Topography and Services ..... 2 2.2.1 Site Location ..... 2 2.2.2 Site Description ..... 2 2.2.3 Topography ..... 3 2.2.4 Public Utilities ..... 3 2.3 Geology ..... 3 2.4 Need for the Development ..... 3 3 THE PROPOSED QUARRY DEVELOPMENT ..... 4 3.1 The Proposal ..... 4 3.2 Operational Procedure ..... 4 3.3 Restoration and Aftercare ..... 6 3.4 Slope Stability ..... 6 3.5 Hours of Working ..... 7 3.6 Processing, Plant and Stocking Area ..... 7 3.7 Lighting ..... 8 3.8 Proximity to Other Mineral Workings/Cumulative Impact ..... 8 4 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ..... 9 4.1 Island Development Plan ..... 9 4.2 UK National Planning Policy Guidelines ..... 13 4.3 Assessing the Proposal in Terms of Planning Control ..... 14 5 CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ..... 16 5.1 Identification of Potential Impacts ..... 16 5.2 Identification of the Key Issues ..... 16
6 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..... 18 6.1 Landscape Impact Assessment ..... 18 6.2 Visual Impact Assessment ..... 19 7 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER ..... 20 7.1 Introduction ..... 20 7.2 Existing Hydrology ..... 20 7.3 Existing Hydrogeology ..... 20 7.4 Potential Impacts on Surface Hydrology and Hydrogeology ..... 20 7.4.1 Hydrology ..... 20 7.4.2 Hydrogeology ..... 21 7.5 Proposed Hydrology ..... 21 7.6 Proposed Hydrogeology ..... 21 7.7 Restoration ..... 21 7.8 Conclusions ..... 21 8 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ..... 22 8.1 Existing Situation ..... 22 8.1.1 Habitat ..... 22 8.1.2 Fauna ..... 22 8.2 Impact Assessment ..... 23 8.2.1 Assessment of Potential Impacts ..... 23 8.2.2 Direct Habitat Loss ..... 23 8.2.3 Severance ..... 23 8.2.4 Loss of Life ..... 24 8.2.5 Disruption to Local Hydrology ..... 24 8.2.6 Possible Pollution of Habitat ..... 24 8.2.7 Physical Disturbance ..... 24 8.2.8 Noise ..... 24 8.2.9 Dust ..... 24 8.2.10 Residual Impacts and Restoration ..... 25 8.3 Conclusion of Ecological Impact Assessment ..... 25 8.4 Species List ..... 26 9 NOISE AND DUST ..... 27 9.1 The Existing Situation - Site Context ..... 27 9.2 Noise ..... 27 9.3 Dust ..... 27 9.3.1 Nuisance, Health and Ecology ..... 28 9.3.2 Potential Impacts and Mitigation ..... 29
9.3.3 Factors Affecting Potential Impacts 9.3.4 Potential Dust Sensitive Receptors 9.3.5 Cumulative Impact 9.4 Assessment of Noise and Dust Impacts ..... 31 10 ACCESS AND TRAFFIC ..... 32 10.1 The Existing Situation ..... 32 10.2 The Proposal ..... 32 10.2.1 Hours of Despatch ..... 32 10.2.2 Vehicle Routing ..... 32 10.3 Potential Impacts and Mitigation ..... 33 10.4 Cumulative Impact ..... 33 10.5 Conclusion ..... 34 11 CULTURAL HERITAGE ..... 35 11.1 Archaeology ..... 35 11.2 Rights of Way ..... 35 13 CONCLUSION ..... 36
2.1 Site Location 3.1 Existing Topography 3.2 Phase 1 Development Plan 3.3 Phase 2 Development Plan 3.4 Phase 3 Development Plan 3.5 Phase 4 Development Plan 3.6 Cross Sections 6.1 Landscape Context and Viewpoint Locations 6.2 Viewpoint 1 6.3 Viewpoint 2 6.4 Viewpoint 3 6.5 Viewpoint 4 6.6 Viewpoint 5
1.1 The Proposal
The proposal relates to a continuation of existing operations, and an extension to quarrying, at Earystane Quarry, Arbory. The proposal is to extend the excavation area, allowing for the continued extraction of dimension stone and rock aggregate, and for the restoration of the quarry.
The Isle of Man Strategic Plan identifies the need for Environmental Impact Assessment [Appendix 5] for all applications relating to extractive industry. An Island Planning Policy Statement is yet to be published in relation to EIA and it is stated within the Strategic Plan that, "in the interim the Department [DoLGE] will adopt current practice from England and Wales".
This Environmental Statement accompanies the Planning Application submitted to the Planning Authority in September 2008 and addresses all relevant aspects of the proposal. Dalgleish Associates Ltd. has addressed the potential for impacts relating to: landscape and visual amenity; hydrology and hydrogeology; ecology, including the restoration and aftercare of the site; noise; dust; traffic; and cultural heritage in conjunction with the preparation of a working plan for the extension.
2.1 History of the Site
Earystane Quarry is an established operation; the current operator took over the site in 2006. Planning permission [Ref No. 99/0290] was granted, in September 1999, for the extraction of hard rock and associated processing at Earystane for 10 years. This planning boundary extends to some 0.5 ha. A mineral lease was also granted by the Department of Trade and Industry [DTI] in relation to this permitted area.
Due to an historical mapping error the permission and subsequent lease do not relate to the area which has been worked to date, and which is currently operational, but to an area some 100 m to the east-north-east.
This planning application seeks to regularise the planning status of the existing quarry while simultaneously securing a reserve of some 75,000 tonnes of Manx Series rock.
Earystane Quarry is situated in a rural area within the Parish of Arbory in the south of the Isle of Man [Figure 2.1 refers], some 2 km north of Colby and approximately 1 km from the A27. The site centre is at SC 236729.
The proposal relates to continued working of an identified reserve and the extension of operations to the east. The closest residential properties are at Earystane and Ronague both lying in excess of 500 m to the south-west and south-east respectively.
The site lies within Earystane Plantation, managed by the Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry [DAFF], and is located at its southern boundary. The plantation is situated on the south-eastern spur of Cronk ny Arrey Laa [rising to the north-west to 437 m ] above the settlements of Earystane and Ronague, with Colby and Ballabeg further to the south.
The proposed site area extends to some 1 ha of which 0.5 ha lies within the current operational area.
The south and south-western areas of the existing operation include areas of discarded material of lower specification. The central area of the site includes the existing operational quarry face and to the east lies the proposed extension area which is currently within the plantation.
The operational area lies between 230 m on the southern boundary and 250m Above Ordnance Datum [AOD] to the north. The aspect is south facing slope and the general slope of the natural topography is 1:40.
There are no services within the application area.
Drift in the area is recorded as absent and from exposures in the quarry this is confirmed. Soils are thin, around 0.3 m , and overlie weathered rock, typically a 1.5 m thick horizon.
The existing quarry workings exploit an identified reserve of hard rock of the Manx Group within the Maughold formation. The deposit is a thin to medium bedded quartz arenite, the latter occurring as 'pockets' within a saltier sequence.
Earystane quarry is identified within the DTI Mineral Resources Plan 2007 as a "Proposed Safeguarding Area for Mineral Extraction".
Earystane Quarry currently supplies dimension stone for walling/building and a small percentage of aggregate. Demand has consistently grown; the production trend has been an increase to current output of around 1,000 tonnes per annum of dimension stone.
Earystone Ltd is the sole supplier to the Island's main commercial and residential property developer, Dandara Ltd. and its dimension stone has been and shall continue to be used in building projects. Having consideration of the limited availability of dimension stone in the Island, a consistent future demand is anticipated with continued growth likely following current trends.
The Proposal
The proposal relates to extension of operations initially to the north, and then to the east. The extension to the north addresses the long-term stability of the northern face and allows for final restoration of this aspect. The extension to the east seeks to increase the existing reserve, maintaining supply to an established market. The proposed extension area exterids to some tha of which the current quarry accounts for 0.5 ha [Figures 3.1-3.6 refer].
It is estimated that the proposed excavation shall release some 75,000 tonnes of hard rock which would be extracted over a 10 year period at approximately 7,500 tonnes per annum.
The increase in production relates to an increase in the primary product, dimension stone, and the production of a general fill product from the poorer quality material which has historically gone into the discard stockpile.
Operational Procedure In outline, the major factors which have influenced the design of the site are:
The proposed quarry development has been designed within excavation boundaries which ensure adequate separation distances from all residential properties and environmental designations.
The existing site has a security gate and fencing at the entrance with appropriate signage warning of quarry operations. This level of security shall be maintained throughout operations for the purpose of public safety.
Works shall commence with the processing of existing stockpiles of rock to the south and south-west of the site. These stockpiles shall be sorted to produce smaller walling stone, the residual material being processed to produce a general fill product. Landscaping of these areas shall then commence using soils and soil forming material currently stockpiled within the quarry void. Phase 1 shall also address the long term stability of the over steep north-western face. A rockhead bench shall be created at around 244 m AOD, with a stable face above this in weathered rock and soils. This face shall be created at around 1 m in height at its southwestern extent, rising with topography to the north. A bund shall be created as edge protection along the 244 m bench level. [Figure 3.2 refers]. The design is in compliance with the Quarry Regulations 1999 Approved Code of Practice.
The proposed north-eastern access shall also be created early in the operations. This new access is taken from the existing access track at 233m AOD providing a level haul route onto the quarry floor at its current 233 m level.
During Phase 2 operations shall extend the quarry to the north-east to its maximum areal extent. The thin soil and weathered rock shall be used to form the bund on the north-western [244m] bench level and to provide a substrate on this bench suitable for natural revegetation. Residuals from the recycling of previously quarried rock shall also be utilised in further restoration of the south-western and southern aspects of the quarry, adjacent to the current quarry access. The creation of the final restoration landform to the south-western/southern aspect of the quarry will, once vegetated, provide screening of future operations. [Figure 3.3 refers].
The north-eastern extension shall progress at two levels extending the 244 m rockhead bench as well as the existing quarry floor at 237 m .
Phase 3 shall see the completion of the re-processing of the discard mound and landscaping tying in to the existing topography to the southwest. This shall continue to provide screening of the quarry void.
The sinking of the quarry void to 231 m at Phase 4 forms the final restoration topography. Some soils and soil forming material, having been retained at the 237 m bench level for final restoration, shall be spread within the void enabling natural revegetation. [Figure 3.5 refers].
Cross sections illustrating the existing and working landform are presented in Figure 3.6. Cross section locations are shown on Figures 3.1 and 3.5.
The aims of the restoration proposals are to address the stability and safety of the areas that have been subject to excavation or the effects of excavation, and to produce an acceptable form that integrates with, and where possible enhances, the surrounding landscape.
Key objectives are to:
As restoration relates to natural regeneration, with intervention [e.g. seeding] only as necessary, the requirement for aftercare shall be minimal. Naturally established vegetation is generally preferable as it tends to produce a more sustainable habitat. The current levels of regeneration on the existing north-west boundary of operations gives a strong indication that, given even a minimal substrate, both Sitka Spruce and Lodgepole Pine will recolonise any area disturbed by operations. In order to increase niche diversity some bare ground shall be incorporated within the restoration of the quarry where no soil forming materials shall be spread. Long term management of the site shall be the responsibility of DAFF who hold a long term lease for the site.
A consolidation of the various UK statutes governing operations within quarries resulted in the making of the UK Quarries Regulations 1999, which is a statutory instrument. An Approved Code of Practice was published by the Health and Safety Executive in January 2000 which sets out a guide to the conduct of operations at quarries. Whilst there are no similar Manx regulations, adherence to the Quarry Regulations represents best practice for quarry operators. Compliance with the associated Approved Code of Practice demonstrates discharge of duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Under the Regulations a rigorous assessment of all aspects of their activities is required to be undertaken by the Operator. Activities which take place within a quarry stem from the fundamental design of the quarry, which should provide the basis of a safe working environment.
The quarry design has to provide, in the first instance, safe and stable slopes which encompass the principle of 'design for closure'. Haul roads and access roads should be of adequate width and allow space for the provision of edge protection where required.
Process plant must be located to be readily accessible, where applicable, for vehicles carrying materials from the face, and for vehicles involved in loading out from process stockpiles. Where combinations of plant are required, these should be set out to minimise contra-flow vehicle movements. Stockpiles and tips require to be designed to ensure safety and stability, sumps and lagoons equally.
In applying for permission to continue quarry operations at Earystane, the operator has endeavoured to minimise the potential environmental impacts and to operate to standards in line with the UK Quarries Regulations 1999.
Currently extraction is undertaken between the hours of 0600 and 2000 Monday to Friday and 0600 and 1400 on Saturday.
Despatch of dimension stone is undertaken between 0700 and 1700, Monday to Friday.
No operations are undertaken on any Sunday, with the exception of essential maintenance operations.
It is proposed that the site continues to be operated within these parameters.
It is proposed to continue to utilise the existing processing and stocking area within the quarry void. A larger stocking area will become available as the operation extends.
The plant complement may be varied or replaced as more efficient/modern plant becomes available. Typical plant to be used remains similar to the current complement with the addition of a mobile screen:
1 Tracked Excavator 1 Wheeled Loader 1 Mobile Screen
Consideration has been given to light pollution, with particular reference given to the [UK] Department of the Environment and Countryside Commission publication - 'Lighting in the Countryside: Towards Good Practice', March 1996. Accordingly, it is proposed that: all lighting shall have a clear purpose; over-lighting shall be avoided; all lights shall be carefully directed to where they are most needed and shall be designed to minimise light pollution; and consideration shall be given to the timing of lights to ensure that lights are switched off during daytime and after working hours.
No night-time working is proposed. Accordingly, the artificial lighting of operational areas should only be required during early morning and early evening periods in winter. Lighting relates only to the lights on operational plant, as such the potential for impact from the proposed extension is considered to be low/negligible.
The possibility of a cumulative environmental impact, attributable to two or more mineral workings operating in close proximity, has been considered.
The closest other mineral operation is at Billown, some 4.5 km to the south-east. The proposed extension shall have no significant cumulative impact with respect to the current workings at Earystane or with Billown Quarry.
The site has been designed and the application prepared in accordance with the guidance contained in the Island Development Plan currently comprising the following documents:
Isle of Man Strategic Plan [20 { }^{\text {th }} June 2007] Local Area Plans
This report examines the proposal against the criteria set out in these documents together with UK best practice adopted on the Island.
The Southern Area Plan is currently in preparation; the Draft Plan is yet to be published. An Area Plan for the south is proposed although as yet the draft plan is yet to be published. The Southern Area Plan will not consider issues relating to minerals as these will be dealt with in an Island Wide Area Plan which will specifically cover the minerals issues for the Isle of Man. However it may be appropriate for the Southern Area Plan to consider the restoration of former quarries and to also cover the issue of amenity screening of active quarries.
Policies detailed within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan which are considered to be relevant to the proposal are addressed below.
Strategic Policy 2 - General Policy 3: Development shall not be permitted outside of those areas which are zoned for development on the appropriate Area Plan with the exception of: [e] location-dependent development in connection with the working of minerals or the provision of necessary services.
With respect to Strategic Policy 2, as the quarrying is a location-dependent development in connection with the working of minerals the proposal meets the criteria detailed in paragraph 6.3 General Policy 3[e].
Proposals for development must: ... [c] not cause or lead to unacceptable environmental pollution or disturbance.
This Environmental Statement demonstrates that the proposal shall not give rise unacceptable pollution or disturbance. This proposal relates to the continuation of an existing operation and includes provision for the reduction of existing environmental impacts.
Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan shall normally be permitted, provided that the development: [c] does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; [g] does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; [i] does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; [I] is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding.
Appropriate information has been supplied within the relevant sections of the Environmental Statement to demonstrate compliance with the relevant sections of General Policy 2.
The countryside and its ecology shall be protected for its own sake ... Development which would adversely affect the countryside shall not be permitted unless there is an over-riding national need in land use planning terms which outweighs the requirement to protect these areas and for which there is no reasonable and acceptable alternative.
The application area relates to an area of coniferous plantation. The site is assessed as being of local ecological value and the ecological impact is predicted to be negligible. As the only current supplier of dimension stone into an established market there is an identified need in landuse terms.
The present system of landscape classification of Areas of High Landscape or Coastal Value and Scenic Significance (AHLV's) ... will be used as a basis for development control until ... it is superseded
by a landscape classification which will introduce different categories of landscape and policies and guidance for control therein. Within these areas the protection of the character of the landscape will be the most important consideration unless it can be shown that: (a) the development would not harm the character and quality of the landscape; or (b) the location for the development is essential.
The application area is not within the AHLV and the proposed extension is not considered likely to impact on the landscape character of the area, Section 6 refers.
Development will not be permitted which would adversely affect: (a) species and habitats of international importance: ... (b) species and habitats of national importance: ... (c) species and habitats of local importance such as Wildlife Sites, local nature reserves, priority habitats or species identified in any Manx Biodiversity Action Plan which do not already benefit from statutory protection, Areas of Special Protection and Bird Sanctuaries and landscape features of importance to wild flora and fauna by reason of their continuous nature or function as a corridor between habitats....
No sensitive species or habitats have been identified in the environs of the site which are likely to be affected by the proposed development.
Environment Policy 7: Development which would cause demonstrable harm to a watercourse, wetland, pond or dub, and which could not be overcome by mitigation measures will not be permitted...
No watercourses/waterbodies shall be affected by the proposed development.
Environment Policy 22 Development shall not be permitted where it would unacceptably
harm the environment and/or the amenity of nearby properties in terms of: i] pollution of sea, surface or groundwater; ii] emissions of airborne pollutants; and iii] vibration, odour, noise or light pollution.
These potential impacts are fully assessed within the appropriate sections of the ES.
There shall be no significant impact with respect to the environment or the amenity of nearby properties.
Development which is likely to have a significant effect on the environment shall be required: i] to be accompanied by an Environmental Impact Assessment in certain cases; and ii] to be accompanied by suitable environmental information in all other cases.
The application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement which provides environmental information to address all relevant potential issues.
The Department shall seek to enhance the natural environment ...
The proposal makes appropriate provision for the final restoration of the site.
Development involving the winning and working of minerals shall be permitted only where it is demonstrated that there is a need for the minerals which cannot be met through the provision of secondary aggregates. Applicants shall be required to demonstrate also that; [a] there would be no unacceptable adverse effect on local residents in terms of visual amenity, dust, noise, or vibration as a result of the on site operation itself [including development, maintenance and restoration] or the traffic generated thereby;
[b] there would be no unacceptable adverse effect on: i. landscapes and geology/geomorphology features of special interest or attraction; ii. Ancient Monuments or their settings; iii. Registered Buildings or their settings; iv. the character and appearance of a Conservation Area; v. sites of archaeological interest; vi. sites containing species or habitats of international, national and local importance; vii. land drainage and water resources; and viii. designated National Heritage Areas; [c] the proposal is acceptable in terms of access arrangements and highway safety; [d] working shall be in accordance with a phased scheme of restoration and landscaping; and that [e] the proposal does not sterilize other significant mineral deposits. Exceptionally, national need for a particular mineral may warrant setting aside one or more of these constraints.
The Environmental Impact Assessment demonstrates that there shall be no unacceptable adverse effect in terms of visual amenity, dust, noise or vibration; highway safety shall not be affected. There shall be no unacceptable adverse effect on landscape or any statutory/non-statutory designations or local hydrology. Detailed proposals are submitted with respect to phased workings, landscaping and restoration. Refusal of the proposal would effectively sterilise a mineral deposit which has been identified in the Draft Mineral Resources Plan as a 'Safeguarding Area for Mineral Extraction'.
The proposal is considered to be in accordance with Minerals Policy 1.
The Isle of Man Strategic Plan makes provision for the preparation of a Planning Policy Statement [PPS] relating specifically to minerals. It is understood that the Draft Mineral Resources Plan September 2007, once finalised, shall form the basis for this PPS.
In the absence of current relevant Manx planning circulars or guidance, and in accordance with The Isle of Man Strategic Plan Paragraph 1.6.1, reference has been made to specific UK guidance this being:
The findings of the Environmental Impact Assessment are that operations can be undertaken within acceptable environmental parameters; it is considered that the proposal complies with the guidance given in MPS 1 and MPS 2. Due consideration has been given to the import of MPG 7 with respect to the preparation of restoration proposals. The advice on good working practice set out in PAN 50 has been taken into account in the proposed design and operation of the quarry.
In accordance with accepted guidance, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan accepts that: "there is a need to ensure an adequate supply to meet our needs but also to ensure that the environmental impacts caused by mineral exploitation are kept, as far as is practicable, to a minimum".
Minerals can only be worked where they are found. Hard rock quarrying shall always have the potential to cause some degree of environmental impact. The key aim is therefore to minimise the degree of any impacts arising from the development. Proper consideration of site working methods, assessment of environmental impact, consideration of environmental benefits and suitable timescales shall assist in controlling mineral development to acceptable levels. With respect to Earystane, the proposal has been the subject of an Environmental Impact Assessment which has demonstrated that the proposed extraction of hard rock can be undertaken without significant impacts.
The proposal is considered to be in accordance with the Strategic Plan in that it would:
It is considered that the proposal is fully compliant with the policies of the Strategic Plan and that it fully accords with all relevant guidance. Accordingly, it is considered that that there are no over-riding factors which would merit refusal.
In order to identify potential impacts at the various stages of the proposed extension, consideration has been given to the environmental headings as outlined in The Town and Country Planning [Environmental Impact Assessment] [England and Wales] Regulations 1999. The Isle of Man Strategic Plan states [Appendix 5] that these UK Regulations are to be adopted in the Island until such time that further Manx guidance is published:
By indicating a positive or negative zero/negligible, low, medium or high impact against these headings, a simple scoring procedure quickly identifies areas of concern.
Mitigation measures form an integral part of the development programme as presented within this report [Section 3], the scoping matrix which follows does not take these aspects of the design into account. It identifies the potential for environmental impacts in the absence of mitigation measures. Table 5.1 refers. Restoration is included in the matrix although being generally positive in effect, mitigation does not apply.
Following the assessment of potential impacts from the development, the scoping process identified the key issues as relating to landscape and visual impacts.
Assessment of other subject areas: ecology; hydrology/hydrogeology; noise; dust; traffic; and cultural heritage, while considered unlikely to be adversely affected by the development, have nevertheless been included within the following sections providing a full statement of potential impacts.
| Table 5.1 | Environmental Impact Assessment - Impact Identification and Scoping Matrix | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Heading | Soil Stripping and Storage | Mineral Extraction | Loading Dimension Stone/ Aggregate | Crushing and Screening | Temporary of Materials | Storage of Materials | Transportation of Materials Off-site | Restoration | | | Human Beings | • | • | - | - | - | • | • | | | | Flora | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Fauna | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Soil | • | - | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Water | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Air | • | • | - | • | - | - | • | | | | Climate | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Landscape | • | • | - | - | • | • | • | | | | Visual | • | • | - | - | • | • | • | | | | Material Assets | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Cultural Heritage | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Interactions of the foregoing | • | • | - | - | - | - | • | | | | Potential Impact | Positive | Positive | Low | Zero/Negligible | - | - | | | | | | Negative | Negative | Low | Medium | • | • | | | | | | | | High | • | • | | | | |
This assessment addresses the landscape and visual impacts of the proposed quarrying operations and the subsequent restoration on the landscape, in respect of the landscape resource, and on human beings in terms of visual amenity. In relation to this proposal for a small extension, a full Landscape Character Assessment is not considered necessary. This brief report has, however, taken into account best practice UK guidance, relating to assessment methodology, as recommended by Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment prepared by the Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment 2^{\text {nd }} ed. [2002] and Landscape Character Assessment Guidelines for England and Scotland [2002].
Landscape and visual impacts are related, but independent issues. Landscape impacts relate to changes in the elements, characteristics, character and qualities of the landscape, whilst visual impacts relate to the appearance of these changes [GLVIA, 2002]. In order to establish the significance of landscape impacts, the value of a landscape must be determined; there is inevitably an element of subjectivity inherent in this aspect of landscape impact assessment. Determining the magnitude of change is generally more objective and quantifiable.
The importance of landscape as a resource is recognised within the Island Development Plan and this is taken into account.
The Landscape Character of the wider area shall not be affected as this is a small extension to operations immediately adjacent to a previously/currently worked area. Landscape Character Areas are mapped, Figure 6.1 refers.
Existing impacts of the current operation provide the baseline aesthetic condition. The operation, while visible, is only noticeable from close and middle distance views in all but the clearest weather conditions; the forested backdrop reduces the significance of the landscape impact. The existing impact relates predominantly to the discard mound and the total site impact is assessed on balance as being of slight impact significance.
Landscape impacts of the proposed extension relate to alterations in the landform itself, there shall be no significant alteration to the textures/colours or landuse patterns. The landscape character shall not be altered and no landscape features, other than the existing discard mound shall be affected by the proposal. The proposed landscaping and restoration of the southern flank of the quarry site, including the mound shall reintegrate the area into the surrounding landscape; a beneficial impact. Taking this beneficial impact into account the extension has, on balance, a negligible landscape impact which relates to the extension of the quarry void.
In terms of visual impact, the intervisibility between the quarry and receptors in the surrounding area is assessed. Five viewpoints have been taken as representative receptors: three are relatively close views [\sim 1.5 \mathrm{~km}], from Lingague, Earystane and the A27 north of Ballachrink; one is at around 2.5 km distant, at the picnic area near to Tom the Dippers' cottage and one represents more distant views from the south of Port Erin [\sim 5.5 \mathrm{~km}]. Views from the north and east are restricted by existing forestry cover and intervening topography.
The current view of the quarry is dominated by the conical mound of discarded material. The working quarry is currently screened from view by this mound.
The potential for visual impacts has been considered in the design of the quarry, both in terms of the physical extent of the proposal and also in terms of the working method. Using existing screening, replacing the main quarry access track and undertaking landscaping works to the south and south-west ensures a reduction in impact of the quarry on all views. Restoration shall have a beneficial impact on the quarry site in the longer term.
Assessment of individual viewpoints is presented with photographic plates, Figures 6.2-6.6 refer.
The existing hydrological and hydrogeological condition at the site is described and any potential impacts that may be caused by the proposed quarry extension are identified and assessed. Mitigation measures that shall be employed to ameliorate any adverse effects are also presented.
Data Sources include the Groundwater Vulnerability of the Isle of Man, Isle of Man Solid and Drift Geology and Ordnance Survey Mapping.
In preparing this section of the Environmental Statement, consideration has been given to relevant planning guidance.
The quarry is currently free draining and no water collects within the quarry area. The wider area is sloping and any surface water run-off flows to the south. Up gradient of the quarry and the extension area is a significant area of coniferous plantation on generally shallow soils.
The nearest water course lies some 750 m to the west of the development well outside influencing distance of operations.
The operation lies above any local water table and no seepage has been recorded from the working faces of the quarry. The site lies within a large area of Nẹn-Aquifer, negligibly permeable [Groundwater Vulnerability of the Isle of Man].
The extension of quarrying operations could have the potential to impact on surface hydrology in the following ways:
Potential changes to the hydrogeological regime relate to the effects of the increased excavation of the quarry. The impacts are essentially related to:
The existing quarry does not experience any pooling of surface water; the quarry floor is free draining.
There are no surface water courses within influencing distance.
Blind cut-off ditches may be created as required in order to control
There will be no pumping and no wet working within the quarry. Hazards associated with potential pollution of groundwater at the wider site relate to matters of contamination by oils, fuels or chemicals used in the operational process. Measures to control and/or mitigate these hazards are proposed as follows:
The quarry shall remain free draining at restoration; drainage will be by infiltration enhanced as necessary by French Drains to the south, into the landscaped bund
It is concluded that the extension to quarry operations can be undertaken without significant adverse impact upon the environment as it relates to hydrology and hydrogeology. No residual impacts are anticipated.
This assessment relates to an existing quarry as well as the area of a proposed extension, currently within coniferous plantation. While the quarry void itself comprises bare ground there are peripheral areas with regenerating heathland and woodland habits.
Surrounding landuse is split between forestry to the north and grazing land to the south.
The plantation margins appear to be representative of the plantation as a whole and both Sitka Spruce and Lodgepole Pine show poor growth due to thin soils and the relative exposure of the site.
Heath understorey is present and on the southern margins of the quarry heath dominates the existing regeneration [a few conifers have been planted along this southern boundary to improve screening although these few trees remain ineffectual to date].
To the north-west of the existing quarry void there is significant regeneration of conifers within the plantation margins.
During the site survey, signs of fauna were noted including the potential for specific ecological niches for mammals, birds and reptiles.
Historical records [Manx BirdLife] show a number of bird species in the area of Earystane plantation including Linnet [red listed], and Dunnock, Goldcrest, Herring Gull and Meadow Pipit [all amber listed]. Observations on site included a female Sparrowhawk [Schedule 1] recorded passing low over the site returning to the cover of the plantation. There are also anecdotal records of Crossbills [Schedule 1] within Earystane Plantation.
Potential for bat roosts within the plantation has been assessed as unlikely due to the limited growth of the trees and the unsuitability of the species present. There are no other structures likely to accommodate bats
although they may forage within the area, making use of the forest edge { }^{1,6} \mathrm{SEP} 2008 habitat/microclimate.
No reptiles or amphibians have been recorded within the site or extension area.
Any species present in the immediate vicinity are likely to be acclimatised to disturbance from the existing operations.
The assessment of potential impacts is made by detailed examination of the development design and phasing with regard to quarrying activities, set against the ecological survey results.
This includes the direct loss of habitat from land take. The development will cause both temporary and permanent habitat loss. The area to be affected is small [0.5ha]; the proposed extension is plantation of limited ecological value. This loss is assessed as being of very low magnitude due to the abundance of similar habitat in the area. Therefore the potential impact is assessed as negligible.
The factors requiring mitigation with regard to habitat loss are:
Habitat creation through natural revegetation will be an integral part of the site's restoration. Habitat diversity shall be increased as elements of bare ground and heathland will compliment the forest edge habitat.
This includes the creation of barriers, which may divide existing habitats or wildlife corridors. As the proposed extension area is very small in nature, it will still be possible for animals to move around the excavation.
Accordingly, the main corridors around the void will not be severed. This is assessed as an impact of negligible significance.
This type of impact is normally associated with roads where some creatures may be killed whilst trying to travel along established runs, traditional territory or foraging routes. The potential impact is assessed as being of negligible significance.
The proposal shall have no impact on surface or groundwater within or outside the site boundary. There shall be no requirement to pump water. There is no predicted impact on hydrology.
Possible pollutants include oil, dust and contaminated water. The risk associated with this potential impact is assessed as unlikely; it is therefore of low significance. No oil, fuel, lubricant or other potential pollutant shall be stored within the site.
This relates to disturbance in areas adjacent to the operational areas where, during tree felling or soil handling, habitat may be physically impacted from operations. The site is contained within plantation of low sensitivity and the potential impact is assessed as of very low significance.
Wildlife generally becomes acclimatised to background noise and as this proposal relates to the continuation of, and extension to, an existing small scale operation it is considered that there shall be no significant additional impact on ecological interests.
There is the potential for dust to impact adversely on flora and fauna within the vicinity of the site. There is no evidence of impacts currently, and with the continuation of present operational procedures, no significant impacts are predicted.
The loss of around 0.5 ha plantation for the lifetime of the development with the subsequent provision to restore the entire tha site upon completion of operations is not assessed as constituting a significant impact. Given a proposed restoration which shall provide a greater diversity of habitats there is ample opportunity for the residual impacts to be generally positive in terms of ecological interest. Restoration shall provide a variety of habitats, microclimates and topographical niches rather than a return to the pre-existing plantation landuse.
Natural regeneration is likely to allow a series of sustainable habitats to develop: bare ground; grasses and heathland; and a progression into forest cover. The residual impacts from the development within the site boundary will be minor beneficial. There will be no direct residual impacts outside the site boundary. There is potential for the ecology of the area to benefit as a whole due to the increase in habitat diversity proposed.
The proposed development area consists of conifer plantation; a small element of a far larger identical habitat resource.
As the proposal is to continue quarrying at a small scale and low intensity, and as there is an abundance of forestry habitat adjacent to the site, the extension is assessed as having low potential for impact on any local faunal activity.
The ecological impact assessment concludes that potential impacts of the proposed quarry development upon the ecological status of the site area are negligible.
Both during its operational life and particularly post restoration, the quarry site shall improve existing habitat and structural diversity and have a minor residual beneficial impact.
| Trees | | | :-- | :-- | | Sitka Spruce | Picea sitchensis | | Lodgepole Pine | Pinus contorta | | Elder | Sambucus nigra | | | | | Shrubs | | | Gorse | Ulex sp. | | Heather | Calluna vulgaris | | Bell Heather | Erica cinerea | | | | | Herbs | | | Foxglove | Digitalis purpurea | | Ribwort Plantain | Plantago lanceolata | | | | | Grasses, Sedges and Rushes | | | Yorkshire Fog | Holcus lanatus | | Sweet Vernal Grass | Anthoxanthum odoratum | | False Oat Grass | Arrhenatherum elatius | | Velvet Bent | Agrostis canina | | | | | Birds | | | Herring Gull | Larus argentatus | | Sparrowhawk | Accipiter nisus |
The existing quarry is at significant separation from the nearest potentially sensitive properties. There is no record of complaints relating to noise or dust from existing operations.
The proposal relates to an extension away from the nearest residential properties, no part of the site shall be closer to potentially sensitive locations than at present.
The proposal is not assessed as likely to increase noise levels emanating from the site. The quarry shall continue to operate at a low production rate with no significant increase in sound power output of plant. Screening of the quarry void shall be maintained and operations shall not move closer to any potentially noise sensitive location. No further assessment is considered necessary in this case.
The term dust [BS 6069 Part 2] is used to describe particles between 1 \mu \mathrm{~m} and 75 \mu \mathrm{~m} in diameter - that is between one millionth of a metre [1 micron] and 75 millionths of a metre. They originate through the action of crushing and abrasive forces on materials. Depending upon the chemical composition, dust can be chemically active e.g. limestone, or effectively inert e.g. sand. The colour varies through brown to white.
The process by which dust becomes airborne is referred to as 'dust emission'. It occurs through saltation of particles across a surface, or suspension of particles and their entrainment in airflow. Wind has the potential to lift dust particles from surfaces depending upon the speed of the wind, the condition of the surface and size of the particle. Tipping of materials leaves particles exposed to wind blow as they fall through the air.
Large dust particles [greater than 30 \mu \mathrm{~m} ] generally make up the greatest proportion of dust emitted from mineral workings and will largely be deposited within 100 m of sources. Intermediate sized particles [10-30 \mu \mathrm{m} ] are likely to travel up to 250-500 \mathrm{~m}. Smaller particles [less than 10 \mu \mathrm{~m} ],
which make up a small proportion of dust emitted from most, workings, can travel up to 1 km from sources.
The effect on neighbouring properties of dust arising from the area of the quarry operation, normally during periods of dry weather, is measured principally in terms of potential to cause a significant nuisance. Annoyance and the loss of amenity can result as dust falls out, usually as a visible thin layer, causing the discoloration of buildings, interference with the enjoyment of outdoor leisure, increased washing of windows, problems with drying washing outdoors, and increased cleaning of surfaces. Most dust is deposited close to its source, as the larger, heavier particles are not carried very far by the wind.
For much of the quarry excavation, any dust generated would fall within the confines of the site or its migration be limited by the adjacent plantation. Nuisance dust relates to larger particle sizes and their generation at this site is limited. There are no sensitive properties within the likely influence of nuisance dust.
The nuisance effects of dust are usually measured with reference to dust deposition or soiling, whereas the effects on health centre on the effects of inhalation and respiration of fine airborne dust particles, especially the smaller size fractions e.g. \mathrm{PM}_{10} [small particles, 10 microns and less in diameter].
There are no significant dust generating activities, no blasting, and limited crushing and screening. The site is remote from residential properties [in excess of 1 km ] and it is generally down wind from properties [prevailing winds being south-westerly]; as such it is not considered necessary to carry out any more assessment or implement control measures other than 'best practice' measures.
There is potential for the wind to pick up and disperse fine particles of rock created during the extraction process. Most plant and tree species are
relatively dust tolerant and no species have been identified where dust deposition would have any significant effect. With respect to ecology, having consideration of the likely levels of dust emission and climatic variables, and the fact that existing operations have had no significant impact, the potential impact of dust is assessed as of very low significance.
The quarrying operations within the proposed extension area have the potential to produce dust from a variety of sources and activities associated with: soil stripping and storage; excavation, processing [dressing] and loading of rock; vehicle movements; landscaping operations.
Soil stripping and storage must be carried out during drier conditions to prevent damage to the soil structure, and therefore there is a moderatehigh potential for dust generation from disturbance of the soil.
The soil's inherent moisture content will help mitigate dust generation. Soils at the site are very thin and the proposed excavation area is small, quantities arising are therefore minimal and stripping of soil for any stage of the development shall be undertaken within a short period of time. Having consideration of the separation distance, the potential for dust emission is considered to be short-term and negligible.
The deposit being worked has moderate micaceous/fines content. There is a low-moderate potential for dust emissions due to the method of working. As dressed or random stone material is loaded for despatch there is very low potential for dust to become airborne. Loading of byproduct, smaller size rock aggregate gives rise to a moderate potential for dust to become airborne.
The excavation and loading of rock shall be undertaken within the contines of the quarry void which shall afford a substantial element of screening. The potential for dust to become airborne as it is loaded is controllable by minimising drop heights. With mitigation, the potential for dust emission is considered to be negligible.
The mechanical action of wheels on unbound road surfaces reduces particle sizes by crushing, thereby increasing the likelihood of dust emissions. Vehicle wheels can throw up dust from the road surface and the effect can be increased by vehicles travelling at speed. Without mitigation there is a high potential for dust emissions from this source.
Operations are generally undertaken within the quarry void and site vehicle speed is controlled by the operator. These factors together with the small scale of operations, and the separation distance are sufficient in maintaining dust at acceptable levels. Despatch at an average of 4 vehicles daily is unlikely to have any significant impact.
Restoration must be carried out during drier conditions to prevent damage to the soil structure, and therefore there is a moderate-high potential for dust generation from disturbance of the soil.
The soil's inherent moisture content will help mitigate dust generation. The replacement of soils shall be undertaken a short period. With mitigation, the potential for dust emission is considered to be short-term and negligible.
The occurrence of dust nuisance depends on the generation of airborne particles and the potential of the airborne particles to cause a nuisance. The generation of airborne dust is affected by a number of factors and depends on: meteorological conditions; the size of the dust particle; the
nature of the ground; the dust source; and the measures employed in the control of dust.
The potential for dust to become a nuisance to the local community is a function of several factors: the proximity of dust sensitive properties and premises and the level of their sensitivity; meteorological conditions; local topography and vegetation pattern of intervening ground; and the duration and frequency of the activity.
Consideration has been given to potential dust sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed extension.
There are a number of residential properties at Earystane, some 500 m to the south-west of the existing quarry. Due to the intervening distance and the prevailing winds it is considered that the potential impact from dust is negligible.
The possibility of a cumulative dust impact, attributable to two or more mineral workings operating in close proximity, has been considered.
Having consideration of the separation distance to the nearest quarries, Cringle [3km] and Billown [4.5km] there is no potential for cumulative dust impacts resulting from Earystane in conjunction with any other mineral operation.
The regulation and control of potential noise and nuisance dust from the site will be based around the principal of "best practice" with emphasis placed on day to day site management to identify on-going requirements for noise and dust mitigation, and to ensure prompt remedial action in the event of a failure.
The potential for noise emanating from the site is low. The potential for dust emission from the proposed extension is negligible and it is unlikely that there will be any reduction in air quality.
No residual impacts have been identified.
The current permitted output is 3,000 tonnes of rock annually. The quarry currently accesses the A27 with all materials, other than local deliveries, being despatched north towards the A36 at the 'Round Table'.
Current production of dimension stone is some 1000 tonnes per annum which gives rise to 1 loaded vehicle leaving the site every two days [2 vehicle movements]. Vehicle movements are subject to peaks and troughs and despatch may increase to meet occasional larger contracts.
It is proposed that production from the quarry would be increased reflecting the market trend for dimension stone use to a total of 7,500 tonnes per annum, with by-product aggregate being despatched on a per contract basis.
Based on a 50 week year and 5.5 day week, the total annual despatch equates to an average of 1 load [ 2 movements] of dimension stone and 2 loads [ 4 movements] of aggregate giving a total of 3 loads [ 6 movements] daily.
This level of traffic generation remains low.
Aggregate output represents on average a greater increase in traffic generation although by despatching on a contract basis this shall be subject to peaks and troughs in relation to demand.
There shall be no change to the current operational hours or to times of despatch.
The A27 is subject to a weight restriction to the south of the quarry [at Colby] and vehicle routing shall continue as per the existing operations with all vehicles, other than those making local deliveries, turning north to the 'Round Table'.
Potential impacts from traffic could include impact from:
The proposal would relate to an increase in vehicle movements. The significance of a traffic impact depends not only on the percentage increase of traffic but also on the available capacity of the road network. The current and predicted future volumes of traffic generated by the quarry are very low and will have a negligible impact on existing traffic flows.
For the volume of traffic generated by the proposal the impact on air quality is not considered to be significant.
In terms of noise, the increase in vehicle movements shall be imperceptible.
The level of vibration created relates largely to the size of an individual vehicle. Average vehicle loading shall be relatively low, averaging 6-10 tonnes. For vehicles travelling on an A-road no significant impact is anticipated.
There is no proposed change to operational hours.
When considered in relation to specific road conditions, an increase in vehicle movements has the potential to impact on road safety and cause disruption for other road users and pedestrians. Due to the low numbers of vehicles accessing the site there is no significant impact in terms of road safety is anticipated.
The possibility of a cumulative traffic impact, attributable to two or more mineral workings operating in close proximity, has been considered. The closest quarry [Cringle] located some 3 km to the north also despatches aggregates onto the A27. However due to the low level of traffic
generated by the Earystane proposal no significant cumulative traffic impact is anticipated.
The proposal relates to an average of 6 vehicle movements per day. There is a recognition that despatch may fluctuate with demand, particularly with respect to by-product aggregate output.
No significant impacts are anticipated in respect of traffic associated with the proposed development.
11.1 Archaeology
The closest recorded archaeological/cultural heritage site lies approximately 700 m to the west of the existing site. The proposal relates to the excavation of land to the east of the current operations, away from the identified site[s].
The proposal is for extractive operations within disturbed land [commercial plantation]. There is no significant potential for impact on archaeology within the proposed excavation area or for impact on the setting of archaeological features in the wider landscape.
The nearest formal public footpaths pass 600 m to the south and west of the existing operational area. Recreational access to Earystane Plantation is at the main plantation gate some 500 m to the east of the proposed development. There are a number of pathways and mountain bike trails within the plantation, none of which shall be impacted by the proposed development. The quarry access track continues beyond the quarry entrance to the west and is currently used as a recreational route; this shall continue.
Signage at the quarry entrance shall be maintained warning members of the public of the presence of the quarry. There is no safety issue relating to continued access to existing paths in the surrounding area.
It is recognised by Earystone Ltd that the proposed development requires to be designed in compliance with current planning and environmental guidelines. Due regard has been taken of these factors and measures devised to mitigate against any potential intrusion resulting from the proposal.
The method of working has been designed on engineering principles which shall enable safe working for site personnel while ensuring stability of the surrounding land.
No quarry development can be designed without adverse environmental impacts; however mitigation measures can negate many of these, lower the magnitude of others and reduce the probability of any significant impacts occurring. Due to the fact that the proposed extension is located within plantation immediately adjacent to the existing operational quarry, the development will be a continuation of existing impacts rather than an introduction of new or increased impacts.
The Environmental Statement concludes that, with the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, no significant impacts shall arise from the development.
Positive impacts shall also accrue as the operational design shall facilitate an improved restoration of the entire quarry site.
F1ename: 2.1 Site Location: pod Project ID No: 372 Reproduced from the Osmenco Survey's mapping with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyrights, Licence No. AL 100010870
SITE LOCATION
Legend
Application Boundary
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: SITE LOCATION
Figure: 2.1 Scale: 1:25,000 Date: 09.07.08 Drawings 119 Drawings 112 102 Ballakilow Ballacamell Ballacokish 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 Upper Ballavarkish Ballakilpherics Cronkedooney 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 291 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 292 292 292 292 292 292 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 299 298 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 297 298 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 298 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299 299
Project: EARLYSTONE QUARRY
Date: 11-06-2008
Project ID No: 372
Project Name: EARLYSTONE LTD
Project Address: 72400 EARLYSTONE STREET, MI 55715, MI 55715
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARLYSTONE RML
Project Name: EARLYSTONE LTD
Project ID No: 372
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARLYSTONE RML
Project Name: EARLYSTONE LTD
Project Number: 72400
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARLYSTONE LTD
Project Number: 372
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARLYSTONE LTD
Project Number: 72400
Date: 09.07.08
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Date: 09.07.08
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
Project Number: 372
1 6 SEP 2008
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Figure: 3.2
Scale: 1:1,000
Checked: KVD
Date: 09.07.08
Sheet Size: A3
DAL
PASSIVE
ASSOCIATES
LIMITED
DAL
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
TENNIS
**T
RECEIVED 04/16/2017
1 6 SEP 2008
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: PHASE 2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Figure: 3.3
Scale: 1:1,000
Checked: KVD
Date: 09.07.08
Sheet Size: A3
Dalgiesh Associates Ltd
Environmental, Mineral, and PLANNING CONSULTANTS
CATHERINE QUARK
PLANNING PL 11100
Tel: 01786 822319
Fax: 01786 822899
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24
PAGE 25
PAGE 26
PAGE 27
PAGE 28
PAGE 29
PAGE 30
PAGE 31
PAGE 32
PAGE 33
PAGE 34
PAGE 35
PAGE 36
PAGE 37
PAGE 38
PAGE 39
PAGE 40
PAGE 41
PAGE 42
PAGE 43
PAGE 44
PAGE 45
PAGE 46
PAGE 47
PAGE 48
PAGE 49
PAGE 50
PAGE 51
PAGE 52
PAGE 53
PAGE 54
PAGE 55
PAGE 56
PAGE 57
PAGE 58
PAGE 59
PAGE 60
PAGE 61
PAGE 62
PAGE 63
PAGE 64
PAGE 65
PAGE 66
PAGE 67
PAGE 68
PAGE 69
PAGE 70
PAGE 71
PAGE 72
PAGE 73
PAGE 74
PAGE 75
PAGE 76
PAGE 77
PAGE 78
PAGE 79
PAGE 80
PAGE 81
PAGE 82
PAGE 83
PAGE 84
PAGE 85
PAGE 86
PAGE 87
PAGE 88
PAGE 89
PAGE 90
PAGE 91
PAGE 92
PAGE 93
PAGE 94
PAGE 95
PAGE 96
PAGE 97
PAGE 98
PAGE 99
PAGE 100
PAGE 101
PAGE 102
PAGE 103
PAGE 104
PAGE 105
PAGE 106
PAGE 107
PAGE 108
PAGE 109
PAGE 110
PAGE 111
PAGE 112
PAGE 113
PAGE 114
PAGE 115
PAGE 116
PAGE 117
PAGE 118
PAGE 119
PAGE 120
PAGE 121
PAGE 122
PAGE 123
PAGE 124
PAGE 125
PAGE 126
PAGE 127
PAGE 128
PAGE 129
PAGE 130
PAGE 131
PAGE 132
PAGE 133
PAGE 134
PAGE 135
PAGE 136
PAGE 137
PAGE 138
PAGE 139
PAGE 140
PAGE 141
PAGE 142
PAGE 143
PAGE 144
PAGE 145
PAGE 146
PAGE 147
PAGE 148
PAGE 149
PAGE 150
PAGE 151
PAGE 152
PAGE 153
PAGE 154
PAGE 155
PAGE 156
PAGE 157
PAGE 158
PAGE 159
PAGE 160
PAGE 161
PAGE 162
PAGE 163
PAGE 164
PAGE 165
PAGE 166
PAGE 167
PAGE 168
PAGE 169
PAGE 170
PAGE 171
PAGE 172
PAGE 173
PAGE 174
PAGE 175
PAGE 176
PAGE 177
PAGE 178
PAGE 179
PAGE 180
PAGE 181
PAGE 182
PAGE 183
PAGE 184
PAGE 185
PAGE 186
PAGE 187
PAGE 188
PAGE 189
PAGE 190
PAGE 191
PAGE 192
PAGE 193
PAGE 194
PAGE 195
PAGE 196
PAGE 197
PAGE 198
PAGE 199
PAGE 200
PAGE 201
PAGE 202
PAGE 203
PAGE 204
PAGE 205
PAGE 206
PAGE 207
PAGE 208
PAGE 209
PAGE 210
PAGE 211
PAGE 212
PAGE 213
PAGE 214
PAGE 215
PAGE 216
PAGE 217
PAGE 218
PAGE 219
PAGE 220
PAGE 221
PAGE 222
PAGE 223
PAGE 224
PAGE 225
PAGE 226
PAGE 227
PAGE 228
PAGE 229
PAGE 230
PAGE 231
PAGE 232
PAGE 233
PAGE 234
PAGE 235
PAGE 236
PAGE 237
PAGE 238
PAGE 239
PAGE 240
PAGE 241
PAGE 242
PAGE 243
PAGE 244
PAGE 245
PAGE 246
PAGE 247
PAGE 248
PAGE 249
PAGE 250
PAGE 251
PAGE 252
PAGE 253
PAGE 254
PAGE 255
PAGE 256
PAGE 257
PAGE 258
PAGE 259
PAGE 260
PAGE 261
PAGE 262
PAGE 263
PAGE 264
PAGE 265
PAGE 266
PAGE 267
PAGE 268
PAGE 269
PAGE 270
PAGE 271
PAGE 272
PAGE 273
PAGE 274
PAGE 275
PAGE 276
PAGE 277
PAGE 278
PAGE 279
PAGE 280
PAGE 281
PAGE 282
PAGE 283
PAGE 284
PAGE 285
PAGE 286
PAGE 287
PAGE 288
PAGE 289
PAGE 290
PAGE 291
PAGE 292
PAGE 293
PAGE 294
PAGE 295
PAGE 296
PAGE 297
PAGE 298
PAGE 299
PAGE 300
PAGE 301
PAGE 302
PAGE 303
PAGE 304
PAGE 305
PAGE 306
PAGE 307
PAGE 308
PAGE 309
PAGE 310
PAGE 311
PAGE 312
PAGE 313
PAGE 314
PAGE 315
PAGE 316
PAGE 317
PAGE 318
PAGE 319
PAGE 320
PAGE 321
PAGE 322
PAGE 323
PAGE 324
PAGE 325
PAGE 326
PAGE 327
PAGE 328
PAGE 329
PAGE 330
PAGE 331
PAGE 332
PAGE 333
PAGE 334
PAGE 335
PAGE 336
PAGE 337
PAGE 338
PAGE 339
PAGE 340
PAGE 341
PAGE 342
PAGE 343
PAGE 344
PAGE 345
PAGE 346
PAGE 347
PAGE 348
PAGE 349
PAGE 350
PAGE 351
PAGE 352
PAGE 353
PAGE 354
PAGE 355
PAGE 356
PAGE 357
PAGE 358
PAGE 359
PAGE 360
PAGE 361
PAGE 362
PAGE 363
PAGE 364
PAGE 365
PAGE 366
PAGE 367
PAGE 368
PAGE 369
PAGE 370
PAGE 371
PAGE 372
PAGE 373
PAGE 374
PAGE 375
PAGE 376
PAGE 377
PAGE 378
PAGE 379
PAGE 380
PAGE 381
PAGE 382
PAGE 383
PAGE 384
PAGE 385
PAGE 386
PAGE 387
PAGE 388
PAGE 389
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 396
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 395
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 394
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 399
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 397
PAGE 398
PAGE 390
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 393
PAGE 393
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 392
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
PAGE 391
Project: EARYSTONE QUARRY
Date: 11/06/2021
Time: 11:00 AM
Page: 230
Project: PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Page: 231
Scale: 1:1,000
Checked: KVD
Date: 09.07.08
Sheet Size: A3
Date: 09.07.08
Dedicated
Project ID No: 372
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARYSTONE LTD
Project Type: EARYSTONE QUARRY
Project Name: PHASE 3 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Date: 11/06/2021
Page: 232
Date: 11/06/2021
Date: 09.07.08
Project Name: EARYSTONE LTD
Project Type: EARYSTONE QUARRY
Project Type: EARYSTONE LTD
Project Number: 2300
Description: EARYSTONE LTD is a project that aims to improve the quality of the EARYSTONE project. The project aims to improve the quality of the EARYSTONE project.
ENVIRONMENTAL, MAXXAL AND PLANNING LEGISLATES
CATHERINE SOUANS
CHRISTIAN COLLINS
Tel: 01786 822339
Fax: 01786 822899
DAILY
PASSIVAN
ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Firm: 2100
Cross section locations are illustrated on Figures 3.1 and 3.5.
ENVIRONMENTAL, MINERAL AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS
CAYNEORAL SQUARE
DIANARIA 7415 04H
Tel: 01786 822339
Fax: 01786 822899
DAILY
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
PAKET
DAILY
**PAK
**DEVELOPMENTS: 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
| Location | Track/Footpath to Lamode | | --- | --- | | Grid Ref | SC 219724 | | Date | 03/07/08 | | Height of Viewpoint | 179 m AOD | | Direction of View | East-North-East | | Distance from Site | 1.6 km |
The existing impact on the pre-existing view is assessed as slight; the viewpoint sensitivity is low and the impact is assessed as low-medium.
The main detractor in this view is the existing mound at the quarry.
The shall be no discernible difference in areal extent of the impact from this viewpoint.
The relandscaping of the mound will be beneficial to the view. Vegetation shall become established on the the southern flank of the site which will aid its visual integration with the plantation backdrop.
Much of the extension area shall be screened by retained trees. The proposal is assessed as having minor beneficial and negligible adverse visual impacts on this viewpoint.
At final restoration there shall be no adverse residual impact.
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: VIEWPOINT 1
| Figure: 6.2 | Drawn: | RML | | --- | --- | --- | | Scale: NTS | Checked: | KVD | | Date: 09.07.08 | Sheet Size: | A3 |
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
DAL
| Location | Earystane | | --- | --- | | Grid Ref | SC 231724 | | Date | 02 / 07 / 08 | | Height of Viewpoint | 130 m AOD | | Direction of View | North-East | | Distance from Site | 600 m |
The existing impact on the pre-existing view is assessed as moderate; the viewpoint sensitivity is medium and the impact is assessed as medium.
The main detractor in this view is the existing mound at the quarry. The proposal shall slightly extend the areal extent of the impact. The relandscaping of the mound will be beneficial to the view. Vegetation shall become established on the the southern flank of the site which will aid its visual integration with the plantation backdrop.
Much of the extension area shall be screened by retained trees. The proposal is assessed as having minor beneficial and minor adverse visual impacts on this viewpoint.
At final restoration there shall be no adverse residual impact.
Extent of View Currently Affected Extent of View Potentially Affected
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: VIEWPOINT 2
| Figure: 6.3 | Drawn: | RML | | --- | --- | --- | | Scale: NTS | Checked: | KVD | | Date: 09.07 .08 | Sheet Size: A3 | | | Dalgleish Associates Ltd | | | | DEVE | | | | A | | |
| Location | Earystane Road Junction | | --- | --- | | Grid Ref | SC 235715 | | Date | 02/07/08 | | Height of Viewpoint | 95 m AOD | | Direction of View | North | | Distance from Site | 1.3 km |
The existing impact on the pre-existing view is assessed as slight-moderate; the viewpoint sensitivity is low-medium and the impact is assessed as medium.
The main detractor in this view is the existing mound at the quarry.
The shall be no discernible difference in areal extent of the impact from this viewpoint.
The relandscaping of the mound will be beneficial to the view. Vegetation shall become established on the the southern flank of the site which will aid its visual integration with the plantation backdrop.
Much of the extension area shall be screened by retained trees. The proposal is assessed as having minor beneficial and negligible adverse visual impacts on this viewpoint.
At final restoration there shall be no adverse residual impact.
| Legend | | | | --- | --- | --- | | Extent of View Currently Affected | | | | Extent of View Potentially Affected | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
VIEWPOINT 4:
| Location | Picnic Area by 'Tom the Dippers' Cottage' | | --- | --- | | Grid Ref | SC 216 709 | | Date | 03/07/08 | | Height of Viewpoint | 155m AOD | | Direction of View | North-East | | Distance from Site | 2.6km |
IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
The existing impact on the pre-existing view is assessed as slight-moderate; the viewpoint sensitivity is medium and the impact is assessed as low-medium.
The main detractor in this view is the existing mound at the quarry.
The proposal shall slightly extend the areal extent of the impact.
The relandscaping of the mound will be beneficial to the view. Vegetation shall become established on the the southern flank of the site which will aid its visual integration with the plantation backdrop.
Much of the extension area shall be screened by retained trees. The proposal is assessed as having minor beneficial and minor adverse visual impacts on this viewpoint.
At final restoration there shall be no adverse residual impact.
VIEWPOINT 4
Legend
☐ Extent of View Currently Affected
☐ Extent of View Potentially Affected
Client: EARYSTONE LTD
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY
Title: VIEWPOINT 4
| Figure: 6.5 | Drawn: | RML | | --- | --- | --- | | Scale: NTS | Checked: | KVD | | Date: 09.07.08 | Sheet Size: | A3 |
DALGLEISH ASSOCIATES LIMITED
Zoomed Image:
VIEWPOINT 5:
| Location | St Mary's Road Port Erin | | :-- | :-- | | Grid Ref | SC 198685 | | Date | 03 / 07 / 08 | | Height of Viewpoint | 40 mAOD | | Direction of View | North-East | | Distance from Site | 5.7 km |
The existing impact on the pre-existing view is assessed as slight; the viewpoint sensitivity is medium-high and the impact is assessed as low.
The main detractor in this view is the existing mound at the quarry.
The shall be no discernible difference in areal extent of the impact from this viewpoint. The relandscaping of the mound will be beneficial to the view. Vegetation shall become established on the the southern flank of the site which will aid its visual integration with the plantation backdrop.
Much of the extension area shall be screened by retained trees. The proposal is assessed as having minor beneficial and negligible adverse visual impacts on this viewpoint.
At final restoration there shall be no adverse residual impact.
Extent of View Currently Affected
Extent of View Potentially Affected
Project: EARYSTANE QUARRY Title: VIEWPOINT 5
| Figure: 6.6 | Drawn: | RML | | :-- | :-- | :-- | | Scale: NTS | Checked: | KVD | | Date: 09.07 .08 | Sheet Size: A3 | |
Daigleish Associates Ltd ENCROMEENTAL, NINEBAL AND PLANNING CIRCUITARY CATHEDRAL SQUARE DUNBLAKE 1613 SAN Tel: 01786822559 Fax: 01786822899
SIAUSSETH ASSOCIATES L1001720
SEPTEMBER 2008
DALGISIH ASSOCIATES LIMITED
INTRODUCTION
This document is the Non-Technical Summary [NTS] of the Environmental Statement prepared in support of the Planning Application by Earystone Ltd to continue the extraction and processing of dimension stone and hard rock aggregates at Earystane Quarry, Arbory.
The proposal makes provision for the development of the quarry and its final restoration. If permitted, operations would be undertaken over a period of 10 years. The proposal also makes provision for the restoration of the existing and proposed operational areas.
An Environmental Impact Assessment [EIA] of the potential impacts on the environment of the proposed quarry operation has been undertaken in accordance with the Town and Country Planning Act, 1999 and The Isle of Man Strategic Plan, June 2007. The results of the EIA are contained in the Environmental Statement [ES]. In the absence of Manx Statute, the preparation of the ES has been guided by The Town and Country Planning [Environmental Impact Assessment] [England and Wales] Regulations, 1999. These UK Regulations require that the ES is summarised in a Non-Technical Summary which is written in non-technical language.
THE APPLICANT
Earystone Ltd is a Manx Company whose registered office is at New Hey, Grove Mount, Ramsey, IM8 3HG.
The Company currently operates Earystane Quarry.
APPLICATION PROCESS & PROGRAMME
The Planning Application was lodged in September 2008.
ACCESS TO DOCUMENTATION
A full copy of the Environmental Statement from which this NTS has been prepared can be viewed at:
The Department of Local Government & Environment Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas IM1 2SF Tel: 01624 685954
Copies of the Non-Technical Summary are available by contacting:
Dalgleish Associates Ltd Mineral, Planning & Environmental Consultants 1 Sinclair's Street Cathedral Square Dunblane FK15 0AH Tel: 01786 822339 Fax: 01786 822899 email: [email protected]
EXPRESSING YOUR VIEWS
For the first 21 days of the consultation period commencing after the proposal has been advertised, the statutory and non-statutory consultees and members of the public have an opportunity to formally lodge their views on the proposals with:
The Department of Local Government & Environment Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas IM1 2SF
PLANNING
The policies and guidance contained within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, June 2007, have been examined in detail. In accordance with the Strategic Plan, in the absence of relevant Manx planning circulars or guidance, reference has been made to specific UK guidance.
It is considered that the application is fully compliant with the relevant policies of the Strategic Plan, that an overall benefit will be derived, and that there are no over-riding factors which would merit refusal.
It is generally accepted that minerals may only be won where a reserve exists and that it is preferable to extend an existing operation rather than developing 'greenfield' sites.
NEED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
To address the question of need for the development, the ES has considered the economic background to this application. Consideration has been given to the existing sources of stone and aggregate, the geology of the resource and its quality, the current Island landbank and future demand within the Island.
It has been established that there is a significant deficit in the Island hard rock landmark; Earystane is a source of dimension stone which is not widely available. A clear need has been identified within the Island.
Consideration has been given to alternative sites, the utilisation of materials from alternative sources [existing quarries] and to the potential to supply the market demand from recycled materials. It is considered that there is no feasible alternative to the proposed extension.
Employment: The quarry will continue to provide long-term, full-time, employment on site. The site will also continue to support local employment relating to haulage and processing.
Community Benefits: The Quarry contributes to the Isle of Man economy and the local community through paying rates to Arbory Parish.
Environmental Benefits: A supply of dimension stone is essential to the conservation and enhancement of the built heritage.
The sensitive restoration of the quarry has the potential to improve the value of the site for flora and fauna and also improve the current visual amenity.
The quarry is situated in a rural area of Arbory Parish. The community of Colby is located some 2 km to the south.
The site adjoins Earystane Plantation. There is agricultural land to the south. Access shall continue to be taken from the A27 to the south with traffic generally travelling north onto the A26. The proposed excavation area is situated within plantation woodland to the north-east of the existing quarry. The plant and processing area will be located in its current position within the quarry.
The total overall area of the application extends to around 1 hectare [ha], the proposed extension to the excavation area being 0.5 ha .
The site is underlain by Manx Group rock of the Maughold Formation, consisting of thin to medium bedded quartz arenite.
The proposed quarry extension at Earystane will produce a range of dimension stone products which are suitable for vernacular building refurbishment, facing stone, walling stone and small paving stone.
Waste rock from dimension stone production and rock unsuitable for that purpose will be crushed and processed to produce a dry stone product.
The primary target market will continue to be in the south of the Island but may be Island wide for dimension stone.
The reserve is estimated as 75,000 tonnes. The quarry development plan makes provision for the phased extraction of hard rock at the production rate of 7,500 tonnes per annum, giving a predicted operational life for the quarry of 10 years.
In applying to carry out quarrying at Earystane, Earystone Ltd has endeavoured to minimise the potential environmental impacts from rock haul and processing operations and proposed operational standards in line with the requirements of the UK Quarries Regulations, 1999, Approved Code of Practice, as recommended by the Health & Safety at Work Inspectorate.
The major factors which have influenced the design of the site are:
The existing site has partial boundary fencing. Where required, boundary fencing will be erected for
the purpose of public safety and to ensure the operational area is kept stockproof. The boundary will be maintained throughout the duration of operations until the restoration of the site is complete.
The soil stripped from the operational area will be placed in landscaped mounds. All soils shall be re-used for restoration.
Phase 1 relates to the regrading of the north-western face. In tandem, the new quarry access will be created to the north-east.
During Phase 2 the quarry will be extended to its full extent to the north-east working at a 237m AOD quarry floor. Restoration works will be undertaken to the south-western extent of the quarry improving the visual impacts of the current operations.
Phase 3 continues the landscaping to the south-west including the final landscaping of the existing stockpile.
Phase 4 sees the progression of the excavation down to 231m AOD. On completion of phase 4, all previously stored soils will be spread to provide a planting medium on restored faces and across the site.
Safety of the site is a primary concern for closure. The restoration is also designed to maximise ecological benefit in keeping with the surrounding landscape and with a minimum requirement for management and aftercare.
It is proposed that the hours of working for soil stripping, rock production, crushing and processing will be, as at present, 0600 hours to 2000 hours Monday to Friday and 0600 to 1400 hours on Saturdays. Despatch will be from 0700 to 1700 hours Monday to Friday. There shall be no working on any Sunday, other than essential maintenance.
In order to identify potential impacts which could arise from the development, the proposals were considered in relation to the following environmental headings which are outlined in The Town and Country Planning [Environmental Impact Assessment] [England and Wales] Regulations 1999, these being:
The key issues identified were:
further areas for investigation include:
The assessment findings and conclusions are summarised in the following sections. Whilst adverse effects are considered unlikely with regard to ecology this aspect has nevertheless been assessed to provide a full statement of potential impacts.
The landscape impact assessment aims to identify and assess the likely impacts which the proposed extension will have on the landscape at Earystane.
The site is not located within any designated landscape area.
The existing quarry operation at Earystane has changed the landscape through the introduction of a man-made landform and features such as quarry faces and stockpiles. These operations have resulted in a slight negative landscape impact.
The proposed quarry excavation will add to the existing landscape impact creating a further negative impact in the short to medium term. The proposed progressive restoration however will have positive landscape impacts reducing the overall landscape impact of the quarry.
Visual impact is assessed by combining a judgement on the sensitivity of the receptor [existing quality of visual amenity] and the magnitude of impact [number of viewers affected and physical extent of change]. A visual assessment has been undertaken at a number of selected viewpoints that are considered as being representative of the surrounding area from a range of orientation and distance.
The visual impact of the existing quarrying operations at Earystane is assessed as having a slight-moderate negative impact.
Depending on the location of the viewer, the proposed excavation is assessed as having a slight negative visual impact as the operation progresses through the extension area. However,
simultaneously positive visual impacts will also accrue due to progressive re-landscaping and restoration. The landscaping of the existing stockpile represents a reduction in impact to slight. The overall visual impact of the proposed extension is assessed as having a slight negative impact reducing ultimately as restoration progresses to a negligible residual impact.
A desk study and field surveys have been undertaken. Consultation has been undertaken with the Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry [DAFF], the Manx BirdLife and Manx Wildlife Trust. There are no ecological designations within the site or within influencing distance.
The proposed extraction area comprises plantation woodland. The conservation value of the application area is generally low although some higher priority species have been recorded foraging within the site.
Ornithological data has been provided by Manx BirdLife together with recommendations for restoration/habitat enhancement.
The potential impact of the proposed development is assessed as being of very low significance. With appropriate restoration and sensitive management there is potential for a long term net gain in terms of ecological interest.
The restoration will address the long-term stability and safety of the areas that have been subject to excavation or associated quarry operations.
The restoration is divided into three sections. It is recognised that there is an existing over-steep quarry face; safety shall be addressed within respect to this face during Phase 1 of the development. Rolling restoration will also commence at Phase 1. This ongoing process will run in tandem with the development of the quarry extension. Faces will be restored as each phase of operations is completed. Final restoration will address safety for closure as the primary concern but will also establish habitats which compliment the surrounding vegetation types and provide foraging resources and niches for targeted species.
Faces shall be left in a stable condition and at an appropriate gradient. The faces may be left to regenerate naturally although some seeding and planting could artificially assist this process.
No significant alteration to the existing operations is proposed with respect to potential noise or dust generation.
With this proposal representing a continuation of existing operations at Earystane, the potential for noise and dust from the site is assessed as low and it is unlikely that there will be any alteration to the noise/dust climate in the area.
Access to the Earystane site is from the western side of the A27 between Colby and the Round Table.
Due to a 7.5 t weight limit at Colby Glen, vehicles turn left, travelling north to the Round Table.
It is proposed that production and despatch shall be increased from currently permitted levels, 3,000 tonnes per annum, to 7,500 tonnes per annum. On an annual basis [50 weeks], average vehicle movements [on the basis of a 5 day week] equate to some 6 per day [ 3 arriving empty, 3 loaded leaving]. Hours of despatch shall remain unaltered. Vehicle movements may be subject to peaks and troughs as despatch varies to meet individual contracts.
The closest recorded archaeological/cultural heritage site lies approximately 700 m to the west of the existing site. The proposal relates to the excavation of land to the east of the current operations, away from the identified site.
The nearest formal public footpath passes 600 m to the south of the existing operational area. Recreational access to Earystane Plantation is at the main plantation gate some 500 m to the east of the proposed development.
It is considered that there shall be no impact on public rights of way. Additionally there shall be no significant impact on the informal paths and trails within the plantation.
It is recognised by Earystone Ltd that the proposed development requires to be designed in compliance with current planning and environmental guidelines.
Due regard has been taken of these factors and measures devised to mitigate against any potential intrusion resulting from the proposal. The method of working has been designed on engineering principles which will enable both safe working for site personnel and members of the public, while ensuring stability of the surrounding land.
The proposal is considered to be in general accordance with the Isle of Man Strategic Plan.
No quarry development can be designed without any adverse environmental impacts; however mitigation measures can negate many of these, lower the magnitude of others and reduce the probability of any significant impacts occurring. Earystone Ltd has approached the design of the proposed development with a view to minimising potential environmental impacts.
The proposed quarrying development continues an existing hard rock quarrying operation. Accordingly the proposal will generally result in the continuation of existing impacts, albeit at low levels, rather than the introduction of new impacts.
At Earystane a positive impact will be derived from the sensitively designed restoration scheme. Following the implementation of the mitigation measures and restoration as described in the Environmental Statement, the overall proposal is considered to have a low level of adverse environmental impact with slight-moderate beneficial impacts, as a result of the restoration proposals, in the medium to long term.
For further Information contact: Dalgleish Associates Ltd Mineral, Planning & Environmental Consultants 1 Sinclair's Street Cathedral Square Dunblane FK15 0AH Tel: 01786822339 Fax: 01786822899 email: [email protected]
Prepared for EARYSTONE LTD by DALGLEISH ASSOCIATES LTD
PIASSE 4 DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Department of Local Government and the Environment
Planning and Building Control Directorate
Planning Section
Murray House
Mount Havelock
Douglas IOM
Tel 01624 685950
Fax 01624 686443
| Date | Ref | | --- | --- | | | |
This form must accompany all planning applications to ensure that the appropriate supporting information is provided with the application.
Please tick the boxes as necessary. Where detail is not applicable to the application please note "N/A" accordingly. This form must be attached to your application (one copy need be completed per application).
Please note that failure to do so WILL result in your application be returned.
| Site address | Earystane Quarry | | --- | --- | | | Earystane Plantation | | | Colby | | 1. I have referred to the Guidance booklet "Making a Planning Application" | ✓ | | 2. I have consulted with the Department of Transport Highways Officer to agree access issues (where appropriate). | N/A | | 3. I have included one fully completed application form and three copies (two for windows) | ✓ | | 4. The correct fee of £ 1200 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Signed Print Name Dalgileish Associates Ltd. [Agent] In block letters Dated 25th September 2008
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
