Loading document...
Application No.: 08/01080/B Applicant: Mr D Skinner Proposal: Installation of replacement windows Site Address: 10 - 12 Patrick Street Peel Isle Of Man IM5 1BR ### Considerations Case Officer : Mr Richard Wilshaw Expected Decision Level: Delegation ### Written Representations ### Consultations Consultee : Highways Division Notes : Consultee : Peel Town Commissioners Notes : Consultee : T M Crookall MHK Notes :
The application site represents the curtilage of 10-12 Patrick Street, Peel. The property is a twostorey terraced dwelling on the corner of Patrick Street and Station Road.
The site is located within an area identified as Mixed Use by the Peel Local Plan 1989. The site is also identified as being within the Peel Conservation Area. The application is for the replacement of windows and as such is to be assessed with regard to Planning Circular 1/98 'The Alteration and Replacement of Windows', specifically Policy 6 'Buildings in a Conservation Area', which states: "If the original windows are in place they should preferably be repaired. If repair is impracticable, replacement windows which would be readily visible from a public thoroughfare MUST HAVE THE SAME method of opening as the originals. Whatever the material used in their construction, the windows MUST HAVE THE SAME pattern and section of glazing bars and the same frame sections as the original windows.
Windows not readily visible from the public thoroughfare must have the same or similar pattern of glazing, but not necessarily the original method of opening, whatever material used in the construction."
PLANNING HISTORY There have been no previous planning applications considered relevant in the assessment and determination of this application.
REPRESENTATIONS Peel Town Commissioners have indicated no objection to this planning application. The Department of Transport Highways Division have indicated no objection to this planning application.
Mr T M Crookall MHK has expressed an interest in the application.
The application seeks approval for the replacement of all existing casement windows with white UPVC casement windows.
Planning Circular 1/98 states that the replacement windows on a property in a location such as this should preferably have the same method of opening and same glazing bars as the original windows. In this instance the proposed windows match the existing windows but not the originals which would have been sliding sash.
After consultation with the Conservation Officer and the applicant it was agreed that although not ideal, casement windows are acceptable. However 50/50 split casement windows with a central horizontal bar would be preferred to protect the character of the property and the Conservation Area. This would also ensure the existing glazing bar pattern is replicated. Planning Circular 1/98 does not require that the original material is used in replacements and therefore UPVC is acceptable.
It is recommended that the application be permitted.
It is considered that the following parties, who submitted comments, accord with the requirements of Planning Circular 1/06 and are therefore, afforded interested party status:
Peel Town Commissioners The Department of Transport Highways Division Accordingly, the following are not awarded Party Status: Mr T M Crookall MHK
Recommended Decision: Permitted
Date of Recommendation: 12.08.2008
N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal 0 : Notes attached to refusals
The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
This permission relates to the replacement of windows as shown in location plan 01080/1 and photographs submitted and date stamped 29th May 2008.
The replacement windows must be 50/50 split casement windows with a central horizontal glazing bar.
I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular No 44/05 (Delegation of Functions to Director of Planning and Building Control)
Decision Made : Permitted Date : Signed : M. I. McCauley
Director of Planning and Building Control
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown