Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
21/01534/B Page 1 of 4
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 21/01534/B Applicant : Ms Aileen Fermor Proposal : Replacement front door Site Address : Granary Cottage Charles Street Close Peel Isle Of Man IM5 1DT
Planning Officer: Mr Peiran Shen Photo Taken : Site Visit : Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 04.02.2022 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. This application is considered to comply with General Policy 2, Environment Policy 35 of the Strategic Plan, Planning Policy Statement 1/01 and Planning Circular 1/98.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to documents, location plan, photo and door detail date stamped as having been received on 16th December 2021. __
Interested Person Status - Additional Persons
None __
Officer’s Report
1.0 THE SITE 1.1 The site is the residential curtilage of Granary Cottage, Charles Street Close, Peel, a three- storey mid-terrace dwelling located on the west end of Charles Street.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL
==== PAGE 2 ====
21/01534/B Page 2 of 4
2.1 The proposed is the replacement of the front door with a door with single-panel glazing on the top half. 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 There is no previous application considered materially relevant to this application.
4.0 PLANNING POLICY Site Specific 4.1 The site is within an area designated as Mixed Use in the Peel Local Plan 1989.
4.2 In the written statement, "Particular attention will be paid" within the area "to the design of replacement windows, doors and roofing materials which might detract from the area" (para. 9.3).
4.3 The site is within the Peel Conservation Area.
Strategic Policy 4.4 In terms of strategic policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 contains the following policies that are considered materially relevant to the assessment of this current planning application:
Principles of Developments 4.5 General Policy 1 states: "The determination of matters under Part 2 (Development Control) and Part 3 (Special Controls) of the 1999 Town and Country Planning Act shall have regard to the provisions of the Development Plan and all other material considerations."
4.6 Strategic Policy 4 states: "Proposals for development must: (a) Protect or enhance the fabric and setting of Ancient Monuments, Registered Buildings, Conservation Areas, buildings and structures within National Heritage Areas and sites of archaeological interest."
4.7 General Policy 2, which provides an overall requirement for all development, states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption."
Visual Design 4.8 Strategic Policy 3, Environment Policy 42 and Housing Policy 6 all focused on the visual design of developments, they state that the design should take account of the local materials, character and identity of its immediate locality, in terms of buildings and landscape features. Focused on landscaping.
4.9 Paragraph 4.3.11 of the Strategic Plan states: "a new building cannot be seen in public views is not a justification for the relaxation of other policies relating to the location of new development"
4.10 Environment Policy 35 states: "Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development." This is also reiterated in CA/2 of PPS 1/01.
==== PAGE 3 ====
21/01534/B Page 3 of 4
Environment 4.11 Strategic Policy 5 states: "New development, including individual buildings, should be designed so as to make a positive contribution to the environment of the Island." Then, Infrastructure Policy 5 particularly states that "Development proposals should incorporate methods for water conservation and management measures to conserve the Island's water resources."
Safety and Security 4.12 Community Policy 7, 10 and 11 state that the design of new development must, as far as is reasonable and practicable, pay due regards to existing best practise such as to prevent criminal and anti-social behaviour and outbreak and spread of fire. In addition, development should also provide proper access for fire-fighting vehicles and adequate supplies of water for fire-fighting purposes."
PPS and NPD 4.13 Planning Policy Statement 1/01 - Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man is the only adopted PPS at the moment. It provides supplementary policy on developments within any conservation area.
5.0 OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS Legislation 5.1 Section 18(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act (1999) states, "(4) Where any area is for the time being a conservation area, special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing its character or appearance in the exercise, with respect to any buildings or other land in the area, of any powers under this Act". This sets out the approach to be taken in determining planning applications, which includes giving great weight to the asset's conservation when considering the impact of a proposed development on the asset. Given that the site is within a Conservation Area, the above requirements apply and appropriate consideration will be given in section 7.
Strategy and Guidance 5.2 There is no strategy or guidance considered materially relevant to this application.
Other Material Considerations 5.3 There is no other material considerations considered relevant to this application.
6.0 REPRESENTATIONS 6.1 Peel Commissioners does not oppose this application (19.01.2021).
6.2 DoI Highway Services states there is no highway interest in this application (13.12.2021).
7.0 ASSESSMENT Conservation Areas Statutory Test 7.1 Before assessing elements of the proposal, as it is within a Conservation Area, a test should be applied to this proposal as mentioned in 5.1. This is whether the proposal would preserve or protect the character of the Conservation Area.
7.2 The existing door has 9 small panes of glass on the top half and this is in keep with the historical setting of the building. The proposed door has one single panel of glass on the top half, although being more contemporary, it maintains the "top-half pane, bottom-half panel" style. Because the door will still be white, the existing and proposed material would not have a materially impact on the character of the building and the area. In addition, the door is not visible to the public. Therefore, the proposal is considered to pass the test.
Elements of Assessment
==== PAGE 4 ====
21/01534/B Page 4 of 4
7.3 The key considerations in the determination of the application are its impact on the property itself and the character and appearance of the Area.
Design of the Property Itself 7.4 As mentioned in 7.2, it is considered that the proposal maintains the design of the front elevation.
Character and Appearance 7.5 As mentioned in 7.2, the proposal preserves the character and appearance of the area. Therefore, the design is considered acceptable.
8.0 CONCLUSION 8.1 The proposal is considered to comply with General Policy 2, Environment Policy 35 of the Strategic Plan, Planning Policy Statement 1/01 and Planning Circular 1/98. Therefore, it is recommended for an approval.
9.0 INTEREST PERSON STATUS 9.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons: (a) the applicant (including an agent acting on their behalf); (b) any Government Department that has made written representations that the Department considers material; (c) the Highways Division of the Department of Infrastructure; (d) Manx National Heritage where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (e) Manx Utilities where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (f) the local authority in whose district the land which the subject of the application is situated; and (g) a local authority adjoining the authority referred to in paragraph (f) where that adjoining authority has made written representations that the Department considers material.
9.2 The decision-maker must determine: o whether any other comments from Government Departments (other than the Department of Infrastructure Highway Services Division) are material; and o whether there are other persons to those listed above who should be given Interested Person Status. __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 07.02.2022
Determining officer Signed : S BUTLER Stephen Butler
Head of Development Management
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal