Loading document...
Statement I hereby enclose three further copies (two for windows) of: - the application form ☑ - and all supporting plans and attachments which must include A Site Location Plan, a current up to date plan in order to identify the property (these can be purchased from the Planning & Building Control Directorate), indicating the site of the proposed works outlined in red, with a blue outline showing the extent of any additional land ownership. * A Site Plan showing the boundaries outlined in red of the curtailage of the building or the building as extended, and its relationship to adjoining boundaries (including written dimensions from each side of the building to it's relevant boundary), and the size, position and use of every other building or proposed building within that curtailage. Please Note: The site indicator must be a continuous, unbroken red line delineating the exact footprint of the site proposed. A copy of this application will be forwarded to the Local Authority of the District, and Network Planning Officer, Department of Transport. To the best of my knowledge and belief all the information given in this application is true, and the documents provided herewith are accurate. Dated 14-07-06 Signature of applicant or agent. Should this application be unsupported by adequate and clear site maps and plans outlining all the works proposed the Department retains the right to refuse acceptance and return the application. SCHEDULE OF DRAWINGS Please detail the drawing or reference number and/or date of all plans submitted in support of this application. Should any plans be missing, the application will be considered incomplete. Please continue on a separate sheet if necessary. NOTE: NO WORKS MAY BE COMMENCED UNTIL SUCH TIME AS- a) On receipt of the Initial Decision Notice the time period for requesting an appeal has expired and no such appeal has been requested: or b) Any Appeal has been completed To: The Secretary of the Planning Committee Department of Local Government and the Environment Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man Government Railies Ellen Venno Department of Local Government and the Environment Planning and Building Control Directorate Planning Section Tel 01624 685950 Murray House Fax 01624 686443 Mount Havelock Douglas IOM For official use only Date Receipt Number 521451 RECEIVED ON Application for Planning Approval The Town and Country Planning Act 1999 The Town and Country (Development Procedure) Order 2005 Please type or use block capitals. The person here below named as the applicant is responsible for payment of the appropriate fee. All relevant questions on this form must be answered. Guidance notes are available on AUG 2006 request. {{table:143636}} {{table:143637}} BUILDING DESIGN LTD 53 VICTORIA STREET, DOUGLAS ISLE OF MAN IM1 2LA PH: 676199 FAX: 612199 AGENT/APPLICANT {{table:143639}} {{table:143638}} ## Planning Report And Recommendations {{table:143640}} {{table:143641}} {{table:143642}} {{table:143643}} ### Considerations {{table:143644}} ### Written Representations ### Consultations
The application site represents the curtilage of a residential property located to the north of Lhoobs Road, Eairy, Foxdale.
The site does not lie within an area zoned for further residential development in the 1982 Development Plan.
There have been a number of planning applications relating to the overall residential development, none of which are considered relevant to this application.
The application seeks approval in principle for the construction of a detached residential unit adjacent to the main dwelling and described as a "granny flat".
Patrick Commissioners recommend that the application be considered as a new dwelling in the countryside and the SPMCE object to the proposal. The Department of Transport Highways Division do not oppose the development subject to condition.
The application proposes, in principle, the construction of a single detached unit to be accommodated by a member of the applicant's family. Such structures, commonly described as "granny flats" or annexes, are more usually either constructed directly adjoining the main dwelling, or are conversions of existing attached garages. In this instance, the application proposes the construction of a detached unit, which, given that the building does not physically adjoining the main dwelling, may in the future be occupied by a separate household. As such, it is considered that the proposal falls to be considered as a new dwelling in the countryside, such a proposal being considered contrary to the zoning of the adopted Development Plan for the area which indicates that the site is located in an area not zoned for further residential development.
It is therefore considered that the proposal, being tantamount to the construction of a new dwelling in the countryside, is contrary to the adopted Development Plan for the area.
It is recommended that the application be refused
The local authority are, by virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2005, paragraph 6 (5)(c) and (d), considered "interested persons" and as such should be afforded party status.
It is considered that all parties who submitted comments accord with the requirements of Planning Circular 1/06 and are therefore afforded interested party status.
Recommended Decision: Refused
Date of Recommendation: 24.10.2006
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal
R 1.
It is considered that the proposal, being tantamount to the construction of a new dwelling in the countryside, is contrary to the adopted Development Plan for the area.
I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular Nos 44/05 (Delegation of Functions to Director of Planning and Building Control) and 47/05 (Delegation of Functions to Senior Planning Officer)
Decision Made : Refused Date : 31/10/01
Signed : [Handwritten signature] M. I. McCauley Director of Planning and Building Control
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown