Loading document...
From: Faragher, Paula Sent: 06 April 2006 15:57 To: Connan, Marie Subject: FW: Planning Applications - Commissioners Meeting - 21st March and 3rd April 2006
From: Braddan Parish Commissioners [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 06 April 2006 15:52 To: Faragher, Paula; Dudley, Cath; Callow, Jo Cc: Braddan Commissioners - Office; 'Buster'; 'Garry Beattie'; 'Margaret Hodge'; 'Peter Halsall'; 'Ray Corkhill' Subject: Planning Applications - Commissioners Meeting - 21st March and 3rd April 2006
Jo Veen,
Please find below the Commissioners decisions in relation to planning applications considered by them at their meetings on the 21st March and 3rd April 2006.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the there is no material planning reason to object to the principle of the application as submitted, however as it related to the detail of the proposed development then there is a material reason as to why the application should not be approved, this being the fact that the proposed development is in front of the existing building line which would have a detrimental impact on the streetscape when viewed from the highway and also establish a precedent for further similar developments to occur elsewhere within the development.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the there was no material planning reason to object to the principle of the application subject to a "Note" being included that would advise the applicant that by an approval for the change of use to the existing surplus office accommodation this would not mean that any further applications for change of use to general office accommodation would be supported.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the there is a material planning reason to object to the principle and detail of the application as submitted on the grounds that there is already existing adequate signage identifying the name of the Estate and directing members of the public to the specific location of each of the traders within the Estate.
That the proposed signage would have a detrimental visual impact when viewed from the adjacent Highway and would establish a precedent for further applications from traders within the Estate which if approved would significantly increase the number of signs that would then be visible from the Highway and increase the detrimental visual impact.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the there is a material planning reason to object to the principle and detail of the application as submitted on the grounds that there is already existing adequate signage identifying the name of the Estate and directing members of the public to the specific location of each of the traders within the Estate.
That the proposed signage would have a detrimental visual impact when viewed from the adjacent Highway and would establish a precedent for further applications from traders within the Estate which if approved, would significantly increase the number of signs that would be visible from the Highway, and increase the detrimental visual impact.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved.
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the there is a material planning reason to object to the principle and detail of the application as submitted on the grounds that there is already existing adequate signage identifying the name of the Estate and directing
members of the public to the specific location of each of the traders within the Estate.
That the proposed signage would have a detrimental visual impact when viewed from the adjacent Highway and would establish a precedent for further applications from traders within the Estate, which if approved would significantly increase the number of signs that would be visible from the Highway and increase the detrimental visual impact.
PA06 00511 Dandara - Highway and parts of plots 21 and 28 approved residential development land between Clybane Close, IoM Business Park and Ballacottier School
The Commissioners would recommend to the Planning Committee that the application be approved. I trust the above meets with your Committee's approval. Yours sincerely
C S Lewin CLERK Braddan Parish Commissioners Commissioners Office Close Corran Union Mills Braddan Isle of Man IM4 4LZ
Telephone 01624 852808 Facsimile 01624 852180 Email [email protected] Web www.braddan.gov.im
This e-mail correspondence and the attachments to it are confidential and communicated to you in confidence, within the meaning of Section 65 of the Local Government Act, 1985 which states:-
"Any member or former member of a local Authority who, without the consent of the authority, divulges any information communicated to him in confidence as such member shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding £1,000.00"
This email has been scanned by the Manxnet Mail Plus anti-virus system. http://www.manx.net/mailplus
10/04/2006
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown