Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
21/00798/B Page 1 of 11
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. 21/00798/B Applicant : Mr Paul & Mrs Jane Kneen Proposal Erection of a 2 storey dwelling with integral garage and associated access Site Address Field 410891, Adj To Victoria Lodge West View Surby Road Surby Port Erin Isle Of Man
Case Officer :
Mr Jason Singleton Photo Taken :
Site Visit :
07.10.2021 Expected Decision Level Planning Committee
Recommendation
Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation 10.11.2021
Conditions and Notes for Approval
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
C 2. The development hereby approved shall not be occupied or operated until the parking and turning areas have been provided in accordance with the approved plans. Such areas shall not be used for any purpose other than the parking and turning of vehicles associated with the development and shall remain free of obstruction for such use at all times.
Reason: To ensure that sufficient provision is made for off-street parking and turning of vehicles in the interests of highway safety.
C 3. The visibility splay(s) identified on drawing 05 REV A; shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and thereafter kept permanently clear of any obstruction exceeding 1050 mm in height above adjoining carriageway level.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. The planning application has been assessed again the pertinent policies and would be read in accordance with General Policy 2 of the Strategic Plan.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This decision relates to drawings received on 15 July 2021, referenced; Site and Location Plans 21/1496/01
==== PAGE 2 ====
21/00798/B Page 2 of 11
Topographical Survey 13TS011-01 Rev A 1st and Roof plan and elevations proposed 21/1496/03 Sections 21/1496/04 Photos sheet 1-14
Amended drawing labelled- Visibility splay drawings, referenced; 21/1496/05 Rev A received on 28 September 2021.
Amended drawing labelled - ground floor plan proposed, referenced; 02 Rev A received on 19 October 2021. __
Interested Person Status - Additional Persons
None __
Officer’s Report
THE APPLICATION IS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AS THE PROPOSED DESIGN COULD BE READ AT ODDS WITH THE AREA PLAN FOR THE SOUTH
1.0 THE SITE 1.1 The application site is part of field number 410891 which lies to the north of Surby Road (B47). The field in its entirety stretches from the highway north and upward towards and as far as the residential curtilage of Surby Mount, an existing dwelling which looks down upon the application site. The boundary between the field and the curtilage of Surby Mount has been changed such that the existing property now has more land than previously. The application site is part of an area which has permission in principle, and which is recognised in the Area Plan for the South adopted in 2013, as being suitable for the erection of a single dwelling, both subject to conditions.
1.2 The application site is flanked and shares a boundary with three residential properties, Victoria Lodge to the west; Surby Mount (the applicant) to the North; West View to the East; and to the south across the highway Thie Ny Chibbyr.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 Proposed is the erection of a 2 storey dwelling with integral double garage measuring 443m2 (4768sq.ft) and glazed balcony to the front (south) elevation. Parking is to the front of the dwelling and accessed from an existing entrance off the highway. The surrounding grounds would be landscaped or grassed.
2.2 The property would be finished with painted rendered walls to the ground floor with the south elevation (front ) clad in natural stone; The first floor walls to be Cedar or Scottish Larch cladding either burnt or dark stained finish. The roof would be a metal standing seam roof system in a dark grey black matt finish; windows and doors in aluminium framed units to be grey or black;
2.3 The built form has a footprint that is long and narrows across the site which measurers at its widest across the site being 26m including the attached garage and main width of 10m deep and 13 at is widest (mainly at the rear). The internal configuration would feature 5 bedrooms in an upside down living arrangement with the general living accommodation on the first floor and bedrooms and garaging on the ground floor.
==== PAGE 3 ====
21/00798/B Page 3 of 11
2.4 Part of the application would see a small amount of cut and fill to take place and the excavated material will be utilised elsewhere on site. The existing hedges and trees on site are unaffected by the proposals.
2.5 The agent notes in their design statement that the overall height is comparable with that of the neighbouring properties roof heights, with only a small degree of cut and fill on site and utilises a shallow pitched roof of 17 degrees to reduce the impact and is 1.65m lower than the former approved under the 2014 permission. The design approach is more contemporary in layout and appearance but in accordance with the design parameters for the site as noted in the area plan. The chosen materials are reflective of the same materials already evidenced in the streetscene and the overall massing; being of a darker appearance would not stand out when viewed from a distance.
2.6 Additional information (09/11/21) was provided from the agents; "on the officers assessment of last approval 14/00969/B where it is recognised within this report that "the setting of the site contains some truly traditional and other more modern properties". We certainly feel that this site is transitional moving from an area of more traditional properties into more relatively recent construction and we offer the following information and photographs as evidence of such"..."travelling through or past the relatively modern estate comprising 70,s and 80,s dwellings, it is at this point that the transition from recent to traditional takes place within the vicinity of the proposal"
Not only has the choice of building materials changed drastically over the years, building styles develop and reflect how people want to live. Open living areas are now desired over smaller separate rooms, larger glazed areas to take advantage of outlooks and offset by increased insulation in roof and walls etc. personally, we feel that the current approval, would have a much greater impact on not only the dwellings adjacent but on the area in its entirety as it muddies the water of design. The approval contains items associated with differing building eras, but mixed together which meets with general policy requirements but results in a pastiche of designs. This is touched upon in the officer’s report at 6.3 stating the proportions are not quite vernacular which leads to a taller property with a different proportion of height to width and also different ratios of windows to wall. The inclusion of a Georgian style door is perhaps a little out of keeping and the addition of what is in essence a modern garage on one side is not what one may expect to find on a Manx farmhouse".
To meet with these policies designers are often trying to fit modern living accommodation requirements into older looking forms/envelopes which often results in oversized interpretations of traditionally styled and sized buildings.
We have utilised materials from the surrounding area and although the overall form is more contemporary, the use of stone natural stone and render has been utilised. The departure from the slate roof serves to provide longer overhangs at a shallower roof pitch than slate allows and keeps the building substantially lower in site than the previous approval. The darker materials also help to reduce the visual impact of the proposal when white painted dwellings do stand out more. The proposal being long and low reduces its visual impact over the current approval. In addition to the above, the site is not approached directly or viewed head on as traffic passes across the site frontage with the road level being around 1.7 meters lower than the proposed ground floor level. Due to the wall and banking behind with planting yet to be undertaken, the only glimpse of this property would be from the drive access into the site. We have used materials associated directly with the adjacent properties, Stone from Homefeild, smooth render from West View and metal and natural stone from Surby Mount.
3.0 PLANNING POLICY 3.1 LOCAL PLANNING POLICY
==== PAGE 4 ====
21/00798/B Page 4 of 11
In terms of land use designation, the application site is identified on the Area Plan for the South (Map 7) as residential with notation 18 on the site. The site is not within a conservation area or within an area identified as being at flood risk.
3.2 Within the written statement this notation (18) refers to the site and describes the location as; "the site lies on the northern side of the Surby Road as it heads west towards Bradda East. Planning approval has been granted for the principle of the erection of a dwelling on the site (PA 09/00508/A)"... "Surby is not listed within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan as an area where new development should be directed. However, the development of this plot would be seen as being within an existing group of buildings".
3.3 Development Brief 18 on page 56 which states; on page as being suitable for the erection of a single dwelling subject to the following conditions:
"1. Any scheme must demonstrate that a safe means of access can be provided with visibility splays of 2m by 36m in each direction. Plans must illustrate how such an access is to be provided.
Any new dwelling must be designed with traditional features (pitched, slated roof, render and/or stone walling) reflecting the character of the older more vernacular properties in the vicinity.
Any scheme must include full details of the proposed drainage arrangements (foul and surface water) for the site to demonstrate that the development will not exacerbate existing drainage problems and such as not to result in any detrimental impact through the flow of surface water into other property. Advice must be sought from the Isle of Man Water and Sewerage Authority prior to the submission of any application.
At least two parking spaces per unit must be provided in accordance with the provisions of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007 (or its replacement) and sufficient space must be provided for manoeuvring vehicles such that a vehicle may enter and leave the site in a forward gear."
3.4 THE ISLE OF MAN STRATEGIC PLAN 2016, The following policies that are considered specifically material to the assessment of this application;
3.5 Strategic Policy 4: (in part)
(b) protect or enhance the landscape quality and nature conservation value of urban as well as rural areas but especially in respect to development adjacent to Areas of Special Scientific Interest and other designations.
3.6 Strategic Policy 5: New development, including individual buildings, should be designed so as to make a positive contribution to the environment of the Island. In appropriate cases the Department will require planning applications to be supported by a Design Statement which will be required to take account of the Strategic Aim and Policies.
3.6 Spatial Policy 5: New development will be located within the defined settlements. Development will only be permitted in the countryside in accordance with General Policy 3.
3.7 General Policy 2 (GP2) (in part): Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
==== PAGE 5 ====
21/00798/B Page 5 of 11
(b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption.
3.8 The text preceding Environment Policy 42 gives helpful guidance for new development within existing settlements with respect to protecting the character and identity of the streetscene; In terms of existing settlements, in both rural and urban areas, new development will be expected to follow the following design principles. Development will need to: i. be of a high standard of design, taking into account form, scale, materials and siting of new buildings and structures; ii. be accompanied by a high standard of landscaping in terms of design and layout, where appropriate; iii. protect the character and amenity of the locality and provide adequate amenity standards itself; iv. respect local styles; and v. provide a safe and secure environment.
3.9 Environment Policy 42: New development in existing settlements must be designed to take account of the particular character and identity, in terms of buildings and landscape features of the immediate locality. Inappropriate backland development, and the removal of open or green spaces which contribute to the visual amenity and sense of place of a particular area will not be permitted. Those open or green spaces which are to be preserved will be identified in Area Plans.
3.10 Transport Policy 4: The new and existing highways which serve any new development must be designed so as to be capable of accommodating the vehicle and pedestrian journeys generated by that development in a safe and appropriate manner, and in accordance with the environmental objectives of this plan.
3.11 Transport Policy 7: The Department will require that in all new development, parking provision must be in accordance with the Department's current standards. The current standards are set out in Appendix 7.
3.12 Infrastructure Policy 5: Development proposals should incorporate methods for water conservation and management measures to conserve the Island's water resources.
3.13 Local distinctiveness paragraph 4.3.8: The design of new development can make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the Island. Recent development has often been criticised for its similarity to
==== PAGE 6 ====
21/00798/B Page 6 of 11
developments across the Island and elsewhere - "anywhere" architecture. At the same time some criticise current practice to retain traditional or vernacular designs. As is often the case the truth lies somewhere between the two extremes. All too often proposals for new developments have not taken into account a proper analysis of their context in terms of siting, layout, scale, materials and other factors. At the same time a slavish following of past design idioms, evolved for earlier lifestyles can produce buildings which do not reflect twenty first century lifestyles including accessibility and energy conservation. While there is often a consensus about what constitutes good and poor design, it is notoriously difficult to define or prescribe.
OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS 3.14 Residential Design Guide 2021: This document provides advice on the design of new houses and extensions to existing property as well as how to assess the impact of such development on the living conditions of those in adjacent residential properties and sustainable methods of construction.
4.0 PLANNING HISTORY 4.1 14/00969/B - Erection of a detached dwelling with attached garage and associated vehicular access (amendments to PA 14/00473/B). Approved.
4.2 14/00473/B - Erection of a dwelling with attached garage and vehicular access. Approved.
4.3 13/91302/B - Creation of new vehicular access and installation of services to site. Approved.
4.4 Planning permission was refused on appeal for the erection of a dwelling, under PA 13/91040 for reasons relating to the design and size of the property (described as non- traditional and eye-catching), its impact on the area and on those in Surby View, Victoria Lodge and West View and the potential loss of trees.
4.5 09/00508/A - Approval in principle to erect a detached dwelling. Approved.
4.6 08/02246/A - Approval in principle for the erection of four dwellings. Refused.
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS (in brief - full reps can be read online) 5.1 Arbory Parish Commissioners commented (22/08/21) (26/10/21) with no objection
5.2 DoI Highways Services, have commented (16/08/21) seeking clarification on dimensions of the proposed access On the amended plans (20/10/21) - do not object.
5.3 DoI Drainage commented (24/08/21) seeks a drainage channel at the entrance. On the amended plans (13/10/21) - do not object.
5.4 DEFA Minerals and Properties commented (09/11/21) "we are of the opinion that the quantity of excavation does not require the applicant to give the required notice under S29(1)(b)(iii) of the Minerals Act nor does the excavation need to be licensed by the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture."
5.5 There have not been any comments from the neighbouring dwellings.
6.0 ASSESSMENT The fundamental issues to consider in the assessment of this planning application are; (i) Principle
(SP5; GP2K); (ii) Design
(STP5; GP2b;EP42) (iii) Visual impact
(GP2,c,f,)
==== PAGE 7 ====
21/00798/B Page 7 of 11
(iv) Neighbouring amenities (GP2g) (v) Highway Safety
(GP2 h&i, TP4&7) (vi) Trees and Bio Diversity (EP3; GP2d;SP4b) (vii) Water conservation (IP5) (viii) Sustainable Construction (GP2n) (ix) Any other matters arising
6.1 Principle The starting point here is the land designation within the area plan which designates the site as residential and guidance for development is given within the written statement which ensures compliance with SP5 for development within defined settlements. The site is adjacent and surrounded by existing residential dwellings and is currently a vacant undeveloped plot that gained approval in principle for a new dwellinghouse and subsequently in 2014 permission for a traditional styled property on site. Therefore the principle of a new dwelling house here is acceptable without prejudicing the adjoining / surrounding residential land according to GP2k.
6.2 Design The design approach here would see a contemporary take on a design and palette of materials from what was formerly approved which was a more traditional approach. The starting point here is that this application would be a replacement for the former approval and the guidance given from the area plan for the south in relation to design notes; (para 3.3 of this report) "2. Any new dwelling must be designed with traditional features (pitched, slated roof, render and/or stone walling) reflecting the character of the older more vernacular properties in the vicinity." What is proposed is a redesign of a former approval as noted in the planning history but of a more contemporary appearance utilising large amounts of glazing, different proportions, increased massing and materials choice. The agents have provided a comprehensive report on their approach to design in para 2.6 and how they design accords with policy and the local area plan design guidance for this site.
6.3 The proposed materials are considered by the applicants to be; "in keeping with other materials in the vicinity and it is felt the proposals finishes, as well as its overall elevation mass, would sit comfortably into this sites setting. Additionally, being darker in external finish colour that the adjacent dwellings it is considered generally that the proposal would not stand out when viewed from a distance". The finish of the property would be different than that of its surroundings but not so different that it would be introducing a different element of build or finish when viewed against the surrounding properties that have seen contemporary designed and finishes for extensions over the years. The use of burnt/ stained timber cladding, grey/black metal finish, natural stone to the ground floor front elevation and painted render to the surrounding elevations could be considered to have a neutral impact. However, EP42 also seeks that "New development in existing settlements must be designed to take account of the particular character and identity".
6.4 On balance while the land is zoned for residential use the proposed design approach could be interpreted to be read at odds with the policy guidance from the southern area plan and EP42 as it would differ from the character of those existing traditional properties. However, this contemporary design could appeal to some and could be argued to be in accordance with STP5 where new development, including individual buildings, should be designed so as to make a positive contribution to the environment of the Island. Whether the design approach respects the site and surroundings as noted in GP2b can be a point of further deliberation, greater weight is given on the guidance from the southern area plan and the wording; "reflecting the character of the older more vernacular properties in the vicinity". This character would be more reflective of the former approval under 14/00969/B. Finally balancing the narrative above, and it's a subjective decision on design, the proposed contemporary design could be initially read as contrary to Strategic Policy 5, General Policy 2b, Environmental Policy 42 and the local area plan guidance for design, but on balance considering all the narrative above the support from
==== PAGE 8 ====
21/00798/B Page 8 of 11
the local authority and lack of any neighbouring objections, it is debateable whether this is a strong enough reason to refuse the application solely on these grounds of design.
6.5 Visual Impact When viewing the proposed dwelling, it would not be clearly visible from the highway at the south, given the topography and change in level through the 'cut and fil' to site the dwelling with a low pitched roof. Any glimpsing views would be read in the residential context (putting aside the general design and appearance) of the property and the surrounding streetscene within this hamlet of residential properties.
6.6 It is further noted the height of the two adjacent dwellings, West View and Victoria Lodge would still sit higher than the proposed ridge height which is 1.65m lower than was formerly approved as the approach is to dig into the site to reduce the overall height and twinned with a low pitched roof keeps the overall profile low. It is debateable whether this site can been from distant public vantage points and whether it would be interpreted as an incongruous visual feature on the landscape or sitting comfortably within its residential context.
6.7 Whilst the property may not necessarily be as visible, it is noted that the Strategic Plan states at 4.3.11 that; "While wishing to conserve the historic landscape of the Island the Department welcomes new styles of housing as long as they take into account the landscape context and the impact on the amenities of the area in which they are sited. Merely arguing that a new building cannot be seen in public views is not a justification for the relaxation of other policies relating to the location of new development".
6.8 Therefore, whilst the proposal is not considered to have such a negative impact on the wider landscape, it is not considered that this would outweigh the concerns in relation to the design and policy guidance on the character of the area.
6.9 Neighbouring Amenities Turning to whether there would be any adverse impact (overlooking, loss of light; over bearing impact, and loss of privacy) upon those neighbouring properties that adjoin the site, the general level and scale of development proposed here, is considered to be relatively modest and not judged to cause harm to the enjoyment of the main dwellinghouse or considered to harm the neighbouring amenity, specifically those to the rear and sides.
6.10 The siting of the dwelling is partially central to the site and the design / room layout and general fenestration with window placement across both floors ensures that any aspects of overlooking or loss of privacy are kept to a minimum. Furthermore, there would not be any loss of light or overshadowing from the built form of the proposed dwelling and garage, given the siting and distance to the neighbouring properties which in turn ensures there is no overbearing effect. It is further noted we have not received any objections or comments from the adjoining neighbours and the local authority recommend approval. On balance, these aspects would be considered to be compliant with those sections of General Policy 2(g).
6.11 Highway Safety Highway Services have considered the merits of the revised entrance dimensions and access to and from the site from the highway noting visibility splays. As the transport professionals their comments are heavily relied upon and it is noted they do not objecting to this application.
6.12 Having considered the parking arrangements and access within the site, the highways safety aspect for use of the proposed entrance in a safe and appropriate manner, and the proposed drainage on the site to prevent run-off water entering the highway, it would not be considered to have any adverse impact on the existing highway or upon those users entering, exiting or parking at the site. As such the proposal would be considered to align with the principles of Gp2 h&I and TP4 TP7.
==== PAGE 9 ====
21/00798/B Page 9 of 11
6.13 Trees and Bio Diversity
There have been not identified issues arising that would impact upon any existing trees of wildlife. The site is partially excavated as per the previous permission and the proposal is noted as being mainly lawned grounds with low planting to the rear.
6.14 Water conservation
The application proposes to introduce built elements on site where there is currently none. This will introduce an area of no-permeable surfacing (roofs and hard standing) and inadvertently increasing the amount of runoff water on the site that could have otherwise been absorbed into the ground. With regard to drainage from these non-permeable surfaces, the application form notes the runoff water is to be disposed of through the existing surface water drainage via a water attenuation system.
6.15 This is identified on the drawings, where the annotation rad the surface water attenuation tank installed under a former approval 14/00969. It was noted as being "an attenuation tank sized for a 1 in 10 year storm event and impermeable area of 638sqm. Hydro international storm cell or equivalent approved 4x3.3m deep units with minimum 500mm cover. Installed in accordance with the manufacturers details". This then connects into an existing surface water culvert to the side of the roadway connecting to an existing water course. The foul sewer is to connect to an existing foul manhole and sewer in the highway.
6.16 Given the topography and setting of the land it is understood from the site visit and discussing with the applicant, the run-off water will naturally percolate downhill to the south and eventually make its way to the lowest part of the site where there is a current ditch / stream. On balance the conservation of run-off water and management of the water course would be in accordance with IP5 and would not be seen as detrimental to the countryside.
6.17 Sustainable construction (GP2n) The erection of a new dwelling would have to conform to building regulations standards which ensures the thermal efficiency of the building is maximised. In addition the building has been designed with the majority of the glazing to take advantage of the morning, day and evening sunlight. Also proposed is the 1.0m roof overhang and guards well from solar gain into the dwelling and also protects against potential sunlight glinting from afar.
6.18 Any other matters arising Excavation on site. Within the application to enable the ridge line of the proposed building to be kept low, there is a degree of excavation shown on the sectional drawings and in the supporting planning statement says; "the proposal has not only been dug into the site to reduce impact on the three immediate dwellings but the roof pitch proposed sits at 17 degrees also".
6.19 Drg. No. 211496 (Sections) illustrates cross sections through the excavation. Section 1 shows the width of excavation to be c.33 metres. Section 2 indicates a cross sectional area of c. 15 square metres. Therefore, the estimated volume of excavation is approx. 495 cubic metres. This estimate exceeds the 200 cubic metre threshold stipulated under S29(1)(b)(iii) of the Minerals Act, so in theory the applicant should give the Department at least 2 week's notice prior to commencement of excavations. The depth of excavation varies between 0 metres to a maximum of 2.0m at the rear of the property.
6.20 DEFA Minerals consultant notes; "At that maximum depth, there is a possibility that the excavation may comprise stone but it is likely to be weathered and most likely unsuitable for use as aggregate. Of the total volume of excavation, a high proportion is likely to comprise soils and soil forming material. It is acknowledged that the applicant has confirmed on the application form that 'excavated material will be utilised elsewhere on the site'. In so much they consider the proposal de-minimus and have no objection.
7.0 CONCLUSION
==== PAGE 10 ====
21/00798/B Page 10 of 11
7.1 For the above reasons, it is concluded that the application is in accordance with the planning policies of the Strategic Plan.
8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons: (a) the applicant (including an agent acting on their behalf); (b) any Government Department that has made written representations that the Department considers material; (c) the Highways Division of the Department of Infrastructure; (d) Manx National Heritage where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (e) Manx Utilities where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (f) the local authority in whose district the land the subject of the application is situated; and (g) a local authority adjoining the authority referred to in paragraph (f) where that adjoining authority has made written representations that the Department considers material.
8.2 The decision maker must determine: o whether any other comments from Government Departments (other than the Department of Infrastructure Highway Services Division) are material; and o whether there are other persons to those listed above who should be given Interested Person Status.
8.3 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given Interested Person Status. __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to the it by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Committee has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status.
Decision Made : Permitted
Committee Meeting Date: 29.11.2021
Signed : S BUTLER Presenting Officer
Further to the decision of the Committee an additional report/condition reason was required (included as supplemental paragraph to the officer report).
Signatory to delete as appropriate YES/NO See below
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
==== PAGE 11 ====
21/00798/B Page 11 of 11
PLANNING COMMITTEE DECISION 29.11.2021
Application No. : 21/00798/B Applicant : Mr Paul & Mrs Jane Kneen Proposal : Erection of a 2 storey dwelling with integral garage and associated access Site Address : Field 410891, Adj To Victoria Lodge West View Surby Road Surby Port Erin Isle Of Man
Senior Planning Officer : Mr Jason Singleton
Presenting Officer Mr Steve Butler
Addendum to the Officer’s Report
The Presenting Officer amended the recommendation to have the following additional condition, and the committee approved the application as per the amended recommendation:
The development hereby approved shall not commence until details have been submitted to and approved in writing which detail any changes in levels and how any excavated material will be disposed of. The application shall not proceed other than in accordance with the approved details.
Reason: To ensure excavation and spoil disposal works are properly controlled.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal