11 July 2003 · Planning Committee
Car Park Opposite Glen Mona Hotel Glen Mona Ramsey
The proposal sought retrospective permission for extending an existing car park serving the Glen Mona Hotel by tipping waste ballast material to raise levels and create additional parking space.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The Planning Committee refused because the application contained no accurate drawings of the proposal or works undertaken, with what was shown differing significantly from the on-site reality.
no objections, however The Commissioners feel there should be certain conditions set such as the car park should be fenced and landscaped around the perimeters, the car park is tarmaced.
no views on the application, the application having been considered and having no adverse traffic impacts.
The works must not at any time cause an adverse impact in terms of pollution or disturbance to the nearby watercourse or the bankside vegetation. No works should be carried out within 8 metres of the watercourse... Measures must be taken to ensure that the waste ballast to be tipped is inert.
Private residents Donald Murray and Michael Kneale strongly objected to the retrospective car park extension citing noise, safety, visual impact and misuse concerns; Maughold Commissioners had no objection but requested fencing, landscaping and tarmac conditions; DAFF Fisheries h…
DAFF Fisheries
Conditional No ObjectionThe works must not at any time cause an adverse impact in terms of pollution or disturbance to the nearby watercourse or the bankside vegetation; No works should be carried out within 8 metres of the watercourse
Conditions requested: No works should be carried out within 8 metres of the watercourse to ensure some riparian habitat is retained to minimise disturbance to the watercourse and reduce the potential for riverbank erosion; Measures must be taken to ensure that the waste ballast to be tipped is inert, i.e. not contaminated with any substance which may leach out and pollute the watercourse; The works must not at any time cause an adverse impact in terms of pollution or disturbance to the nearby watercourse or the bankside vegetation
Maughold Commissioners
Conditional No Objectionno objections, however The Commissioners feel there should be certain conditions set such as the car park should be fenced and landscaped around the primeters, the car park is tarmaced
Conditions requested: the car park should be fenced and landscaped around the primeters; the car park is tarmaced
