Given that the building is a Registered Building (No. 69) it is recommended that you consult with the Conservation section of the Department prior to the submission of such an application.

Yours sincerely

Mrs Fiona Mullen Planning Officer

c.c Mrs M Hendy Conservation Officer Mr S Olsen Enforcement Officer

| Application No. ... 06-12013... | Page of | | --- | --- | | Planning | Refused | | REASONS FOR REFUSAL | | | D The windour for reason of this design, method of opening of finish are considered to be detrimental to the appearance of the premium. Registered Building within the construction construction area. | | | Enforcement, action | | | Peter back to home for | 4.110. | | Note: | 12/3101 | | | 28 15-3-01 | | Note: | | | Your attention is drawn to the accompanying enforcement action. | |

Department of Local Government and the Environment

Rheynn Reiltys Ynnydagh as y Chymmyltaght

The Planning Committee Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas Isle of Man IM1 2SF Tel: (01624) 685950 Fax: (01624) 685943

R M Quine Secretary Planning Committee

Please reply to the Secretary

Our Ref: GIB Your Ref:

19 March 2001

Mrs MD Woodside 83 Malew Street Castletown IM9 1LX

Dear Sir(s)

Application No: 00/02018/GB Proposal: Installation of replacement windows (as fitted) Address: 1 Castle Street Castletown IM9 1LF Applicant: Wychwood Trust

Thank you for your letter received by this office on 16 March 2001, and which contained your views regarding the above Planning Application.

Unfortunately your letter was received after the date specified in the Public Notice which appeared in the local press advertising this planning application. This notice was published in accordance with Schedule 1, paragraph 4 of the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development Plan) Order 1982. This notice first appeared on 15 February 2001, and stated that any views in relation to the planning applications shown in that notice were to be received in this office within a fourteen day period.

Due to the late submission of your views, it will not be possible, should the planning application be the subject of subsequent review or appeal proceedings, for you to be made a Party to those proceedings.

However, your views will be taken into consideration when the application is determined. You will be notified of the decision in due course. Yours faithfully for Secretary Planning Committee

83 Molen Street, Castleton. 1M9 1LX. March 15th 2001

Dear Sir,

No. 1 Castle Street (Registered Building) Application No: 00/02019/GB

Grade and overlooking The Parade. It is proposed in the application that top-lung casements should be filled because this type was already present. These casements windows would have been installed c. 1970 or later when there was little or no central and copy replacement windows, sympathetic to the building and its location, were not yet a matter for concern. It is a mistake to fit more of this (casement) type. When that, they are two-dimensional; when open, they create reflections never produced by traditional such window panes, and in profile the protruding flaps ruin the attempt to mimic the routes so carefully preserved on other buildings on The Parade and Market Square.

Now is the time to restore historically correct such windows.

Present on a photograph of this guide and c. 1989, when a lower window is open covering the type clearly. For convenience I have assembled the reproduction in Storlam and Housett, the No. 1, item 1A present this, No. 1B, The Grade, Seaside Pharmacy, 1M9, p. 11 (1989m).

In the same way, in the case of the Red House, No. 1 The Parade (an adjoining building), I hope that eventually it may be possible to have windows fitted of a consistent and accurate (also 18th century) such type and even restore the fine limelight, commonly removed but surely recorded on photographs.

Yours faithfully,

M. O. Biceboide (Mrs.)

ADDENDING - 'Hawtland', No. 2 Castle Street Now the ways are all the people in a disappointing to see the effect. It would be expensive project has been applied by insufficient care over windows - the part which is most visible. Closing here generally are therapy and there are the windows in the upper siding have the wrong number of doors as well, resulting in panes of ugly proportions. Fine care photographs exist of the 18th and 1st centuries, which this is critically based and could have occurred a good, accurate restoration. - As soon as, p. 12 (1989m).

Dear Sir,

I know this letter will arrive 120 late for the Committee to consider. I am very sorry. Unfortunately, I made a mistake above the closing date, being caught up in submitting comments on the Coalition's plans by 4.9.01. I will, as I didn't quite arrive there on time, and was hurrying to check plans and references - all to no avail so I didn't check the date. Still, I've tried to look at some wider issues and thought the letter was worth posting. Yours faithfully, M.D. Woodside.