Officer Report Recommendation

6.8 In summary, it is considered that the proposed replacement dwelling and enlarged curtilage would result in an enhancement of the environment and as such that the proposal complies with the intentions of Housing Policy 14 and the application is recommended for approval.

Party Status

7.1 The local authority, Rushen Parish Commissioners are, by virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013, paragraph 6 (4) (e), considered "interested persons" and as such should be afforded party status. 7.2 The Highway Authority is granted interested party status under the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013 paragraph 6 (4) d. 7.3 The residents of Seascape are opposite the site and should be afforded party status in this case. 7.4 The resident of Douglas is not directly affected by the proposal and should not be afforded party status in this case.

Recommendation

Recommended Decision: Permitted

Date of 12.02.2014

Recommendation:

Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal

C : Conditions for approval

N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal

• : Notes attached to refusals

C 1.

The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.

C 2.

This approval relates to the erection of a replacement dwelling and the enlargement of the existing residential curtilage as shown in drawings SC1299/P/10-01, SC1299/P/11-01, P00-01, SC1299/P/10-02, SC1299-P-10-00 all received on 23rd December, 2013.

I confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to it under the Town and Country (Development Procedure) 2005 17 February 2014 13/91532/8

17 February 2014

Committee Meeting Date :

Signed : Presenting Officer Further to the decision of the Committee an additional report/condition reason is required. Signing Officer to delete as appropriate

YES/NO