Planning Refusal Notice 09/01744/C
Town and Country Planning Act 1999
Town and Country (Development Procedure) Order 2005
Mushtaq Khan & Geraldine Khan 3 Pinehurst Glen Saddlestone Douglas IM2 1PP
In pursuance of powers granted under the above Act and Order the PLANNING COMMITTEE of the Department of Local Government and the Environment does hereby REFUSE the following application made on behalf of:
Name: Mushtaq Khan & Geraldine Khan Proposal: Change of use from residential dwelling to specialist consulting rooms at: Greystones 19 Ballanard Road Douglas Isle of Man IM2 5HA
which was considered on 4th February 2010, for the reasons set out below.
Date of Issue: 8th February 2010
Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas
Mrs P Faragher Deputy Secretary to the Planning Committee
Reason(S) For Refusal:
- The proposed development would be contrary to General Policy 2 and Community Policy 6 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007 by reason that the development would provide inadequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space which could result in additional on street parking to the detriment of residential amenity.
- The proposed development would be contrary to General Policy 2 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007 by reason that it would adversely affect the character of the residential property and the locality.
This decision was made by the Planning Committee constituted in accordance with Article 3(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2005.
09/01744/C
Guidance Note
The decision contained in this notice does not become final until either;
- $\quad$ The time for requesting an appeal has expired; or
- Any appeal has been determined;
Whichever is the later. Any appeal against this decision must be in writing and must be received by this Department within 21 days of the date of this notice.
A form and guidance notes are available from either the Planning Office, Tel 685950, or to download from the Department's website www.gov.im/ dlge/planning/plan/applications/decision.xml
A copy of the Officer's report, which led to this decision, is attached for reference. This report, together with correspondence relative to the application, is available for inspection by anyone wishing to view it at the Department.
