26 August 2015 · Council of Ministers
Field 314574, Poortown Road, Peel, Isle Of Man, IM5 2al
The proposal involves building a facility on fields 314574 & 314514 at Poortown Road, Peel, to temporarily store dredgings from Peel Marina for up to five years. The applicant is the Department of Infrastructure.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The development was approved on a short-term basis because it meets a specific need for temporary storage of dredgings from Peel Marina.
Time limit and restoration
The storage facility hereby approved shall remain for a limited period of five years from the date of this approval. On (or before) the expiry of this approval the facility shall be removed and the land restored to its former levels, or to an agreed profile, be seeded and be capable of use for agricultural purposes in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by Planning and Building Control Directorate of the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture (P&BC DEFA).
Remediation scheme
Prior to the facility hereby approved ceasing to operate, a detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for its intended subsequent use must be submitted to and approved in writing by P&BC DEFA.
Remediation implementation and verification
The approved final remediation scheme submitted pursuant to condition 2, must be carried out in accordance with its terms. Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme, a verification report that demonstrates the effectiveness of the remediation carried out must be produced, and is subject to the approval in writing of P&BC DEFA.
Unexpected contamination reporting
In the event that contamination is found following final remediation it must be reported in writing immediately to DEFA. An investigation and risk assessment must then be undertaken and where remediation is necessary a remediation scheme must be prepared and be submitted to and approved in writing by P&BC DEFA and implemented.
No further deposits
Following the initial disposal of material (which has now been completed), no further material may be transported to and deposited at the site.
Tree survey and planting
Within a period of three months from the date of this approval, a detailed tree survey indicating: (i) those trees which have been removed from the site in order to construct the facility; (ii) those trees which are likely to have been damaged as a result of the works to construct the facility; and (iii) a scheme for tree planting, including a timetable for such shall be submitted to and approved in writing by P&BC DEFA.
German Parish Commissioners object to the retrospective application for a temporary dredgings storage facility at Poortown Quarry, citing lack of zoning, countryside intrusion, aesthetic and material detriment, and tree destruction.
Key concern: land is not zoned for such use
German Parish Commissioners
ObjectionMy Commissioners have no option but to object to this retrospective application; If this construction had been created by anyone else but a Government Department, and had it not already been a fait accompli, the Commissioners believe it would not have received planning permission
German Parish Commissioners
ObjectionMy Commissioners do not wish to make any further comments on the supplementary information requested until the Department can categorically confirm they have finished with this site, until then they maintain their objection
The original application by the Department of Infrastructure (DoI) for construction of a temporary silt storage facility on fields at Poortown Road, German, was retrospective as works were completed prior to submission due to urgent dredging needs from Peel Marina silting exacerbated by heavy metals. The application was referred to the Council of Ministers under procedural rules as it involved DoI land. Appellant DoI argued overriding national need under GP3(g) due to statutory harbour duties, lack of viable alternatives (sea disposal risked fisheries, other sites unfeasible), engineered containment, and restoration plans. Objectors (residents, parish) raised invalidity, traffic/amenity impacts, visual harm, tree loss, and policy conflict. Inspector Alan Langton found urgent national need, no better alternatives, site suitable despite landscape harm (screened, temporary), haul route acceptable, and recommended approval with conditions for 5-year limit, restoration, remediation, no further deposits, and tree survey.
Precedent Value
Demonstrates GP3(g)/EN1 exceptions apply to urgent infrastructure needs where no alternatives exist, even retrospectively in countryside/AHLV; future applicants must prove national imperative, exhaust options, provide robust engineering/restoration.
Inspector: Alan Langton DipTP CEng MRTPI MICE MCIHT