8 January 2024
Laxey Wheel, Wheel Hill, Laxey, Isle Of Man, IM4 7nl
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
Multiple public representations and one parish commissioner response object to the proposed visitor entrance building at Laxey Wheel due to its inappropriate design, colour, and impact on the heritage setting of the Scheduled Ancient Monument and Conservation Area.
Key concern: inappropriate design and colour of proposed building out of character with heritage setting of Laxey Wheel
Garff Commissioners
ObjectionThe consensus was that the proposed building was of poor design quality and was out of character with the integrity of this important heritage site.; The Board resolved to Object to the proposals and encourage MNH to bring forward a design that more appropriately respects the heritage value of the Laxey Wheel.
Laxey and Lonan Heritage Trust
Objectionthe appearance and colour of the proposed building is completely out of character for one of the Island's foremost tourist attractions and heritage sites.; Accordingly, the Laxey and Lonan Heritage Trust wishes to register its objection to this planning application.
2 Glen View (resident)
ObjectionLaxey Wheel is the “Stonehenge” of the Isle of Man in importance.; The removal of the turnstile also would be vandalism, this being the last glen site in the Isle of Man where such structures were in common use where such a turnstile still exists.; a design that is more akin to a blue (a colour totally alien to the wheel and its casing) portaloo block; The proposal does not enhance the Conservation Area of Laxey and therefore is contrary to Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 Environment Policies 35 and 39; does not contain an archaeological evaluation both contrary to Environment Policies 40 and 41.
Isle of Man Victorian Society
No CommentA plan is required properly showing the location of the gates in relation to the ramp and the proposed building and an elevational drawing showing the gates which will probably have to be taken down and repositioned; How, otherwise would adjoining land owners know if they would be affected by noise, smell or dust if the purpose of the rooms were not shown ?; confirmation as to whether the staff accommodation includes sanitary facilities for the staff as there isn’t any notation about foul drainage
