Loading document...
Oik Coonceil ny Shirveishee
CABINET OFFICE Government Office DOUGLAS Isle of Man IM1 3PN Direct Line (01624) 685280 Fax Number (01624) 685710 Email [email protected] CHIEF SECRETARY Will Greenhow ACMA
21st April 2015
Our Ref: DF15/0002 Planning Application Ref No: 15/00017/A Planning Secretary Department of Infrastructure Planning Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas
Dear Sir/Madam,
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1999 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE) (No2) ORDER 2013
| PA Ref | 15/00017/A | | --- | --- | | Applicant | Laxey Village Commissioners | | Proposal | Approval in principle for demolition of existing Commissioners Offices and replacement with a residential development | | Address | 35 New Road and adjacent land, Laxey IM4 7BQ |
I refer to the abovementioned planning application.
In accordance with Article 10(9) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013, I herewith give notice of the decision as follows.
The application has been approved subject to the following condition(s);
Reason: To comply with Article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013.
Reason: To comply with the Town and Country (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013.
Reason: To avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
a) the provision to be made for the parking and turning of vehicles within the site;
b) the surface treatment of any roadways and other parts of the site that will not be covered by buildings;
c) the external materials to be used in the development;
d) visibility splays;
e) existing and proposed ground and floor levels.
Reason: This is an approval in principle and these matters require detailed consideration by the Department.
In accordance with Article 10(10)(c) of the Order, please be advised that the decision of the Council of Ministers is binding and final (subject to the possibility of judicial review by petition of doleance).
Yours faithfully,
A Johnstone Planning Appeals Administrator On behalf of the Chief Secretary
Crown Division Government Offices Douglas Isle of Man 27 March 2015 To the Council of Ministers Case Reference DF15/0002 Planning Application 15/00017/A Application by the Laxey Village Commissioners for approval in principle for the demolition of the existing Commissioners' Offices and replacement with residential development at No 35 New Road, and adjacent land, Laxey.
works. Shortly afterwards, the principal roof rafter failed. Further investigations revealed that it would not be a simple job to repair the rafter because the whole of the roof covering was in poor condition and required renewal. Other essential works also need to be undertaken, for example window renewal/repair and re-rendering. Due to the estimated costs of all of these works, the option of building new offices on the site was explored. The Government Valuer viewed the property but was not supportive. Other options have therefore had to be explored. If the current application for residential development were to be successful, the Laxey Village Commissioners and MER would sell the site.
The Department of Infrastructure's Planning and Building Control Division has advised that the site lies within the Laxey Conservation Area. In the Laxey and Lonan Local Plan Order 2005 the land is designated as "Mixed Use - residential/retail/office".
Relevant policies in the Isle of Man Strategic Plan (IoMSP) include:
Highway Services do not oppose the application subject to off-street parking being provided in accordance with the IoMSP's standards.
A nearby resident, living at Ruskinville, Lower Rencell Hill has no objection to the proposal, but hopes that the Council of Ministers will pay particular consideration to density, parking, and the retention of the public footpath from New Road to Lower Rencell Hill.
Manx Utilities have advised that the developer should make contact to discuss the electricity supply.
ASSESSMENT
The principle of residential development
The site is designated as "Mixed Use - residential/retail/office" in the Laxey and Lonan Local Plan Order 2005, part of the Development Plan. The proposed residential development would accord with this designation. The development would also make optimal use of previously-developed land, and it would be within a village; the objectives of Strategic Policies 1 and 2 of the IoMSP.
I therefore find the principle of residential development to be acceptable.
Note: It is important to remember that this application is for approval in principle. Detailed matters, such as those raised by Highway Services and the resident of
Lower Rencell Hill, would need to be the subject of a Reserved Matters application.
The potential loss of a community facility
The building does not provide "community facilities" of the kind that Community Policy 3 seeks to protect. For example, it neither contains a hall nor any leisure facilities. I am therefore satisfied that the proposal would not result in the potential loss of a community facility.
I am also comforted by the fact that, according to the applicants, alternative office space is available for lease or purchase in Laxey. There is therefore no suggestion that the local organisations that currently use the building would find themselves homeless if the building were to be demolished.
CONCLUSION
RECOMMENDATION
Reason: To comply with Article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013.
Reason: To comply with the Town and Country (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013.
Reason: To avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
a) the provision to be made for the parking and turning of vehicles within the site
b) the surface treatment of any roadways and other parts of the site that will not be covered by buildings c) the external materials to be used in the development d) visibility splays e) existing and proposed ground and floor levels.
Reason: This is an approval in principle and these matters require detailed consideration by the Department. Ruth MacKenzie Ruth MacKenzie BA(Hons) MRTPI Independent Inspector
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal