Loading document...
Application No.: 10/00200/CON Applicant: Ms Stevie Ledger Proposal: Registered Building consent for the installation of a replacement front door (In association with 10/00199/GB) Registered Building Nos. 057 Site Address: 4 Quay Lane Castletown Isle Of Man IM9 1LE ### Considerations Case Officer : Mr S Moore Expected Decision Level: Senior Planning Officer ### Written Representations ### Consultations Consultee : Castletown Commissioners Notes :
The site represents the curtilage of 4, Quay Lane, a terraced, three storey property which is stone faced and has sliding sash windows in the ground and first floors and fixed casement windows in the top floor facing onto Quay Lane. The existing door on the front of the property is a timber door with small square glazed area in the top half.
The site lies within an area designated on the Castletown Local Plan of 1991 and the draft Southern Area Plan which was published on 23rd October, 2009 as Mixed use, reflecting the mixture of civic, commercial and residential uses in the Quay/Parliament Square area.
The site also lies within Castletown's Conservation Area and the building is Registered (RB 57).
The following applications have been submitted in respect of this site: PA 84/00841/B - Replacement of door with window and damp-proofing of basement, 4 Quay Lane, Castletown Status - Permitted PA 96/01964/GB - Replacement of existing windows, 4 Quay Lane, Castletown. Status - Permitted THE PROPOSAL
Proposed now is the replacement of the front door with a new stable-type door with a glazed top section. The door, when closed will resemble that which it is replacing, although when open, the top and bottom sections will operate independent of each other.
Strategic Plan Environment Policy 35 and Planning Policy Statement 1/01 both require development within a Conservation Area to preserve or enhance the Area and Environment Policy 32 and the Statement both presume against development which would detrimentally affect the character or appearance of a Registered Building.
In this case, the new door will resemble that which it is replacing and as such it is considered that there is no adverse impact which would justify refusing the application.
As the property is a Registered Building (RB 57), the content of this application has been considered with particular regard to Policy RB/5 ALTERATIONS AND EXTENSIONS as set out within Planning Policy Statement 1/01- Policy and Guidance Notes for the Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man.
The existing door is not the original and is modern, possibly 1970s/80s. The removal and replacement of the existing door with the proposed 'stable door' is acceptable as the design of the proposed door is neither considered to detract from the character of the Registered Building nor the Conservation Area within which it sits.
The Department of Transport and the local authority are, by virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2005, paragraph 6 (5) (c) and (d), considered "interested persons" and as such should be afforded party status.
Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 31.03.2010 Conditions and Notes for Approval / Reasons and Notes for Refusal
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions R : Reasons for refusal
C 1. The development hereby permitted shall commence before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
C 2.
This permission relates to the installation of a replacement door as shown in drawings 1502-02 date stamped 18 February 2010, the location plan date stamped 15 February 2010 and 18 February 2010 and the A4 Photo Sheet date stamped 18th February, 2010.
I confirm that this decision accords with Government Circular No 09/09 Delegation of functions, 10/09 Delegation of Functions (Development Procedure), GC No 11/09 (Advertisements) and GC No 12/09 (Registered Buildings) all to the Senior Planning Officer
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 8/4/10
Signed : ______________________________ Senior Planning Officer
31 March 2010 10/00200/CON Page 3 of 3
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown