Loading document...

Cabinet Office
CABINET OFFICE
Government Office DOUGLAS Isle of Man IM1 3PN Direct Line (01624) 685280 Fax Number (01624) 685710 Email [email protected]
CHIEF SECRETARY
Will Greenhow ACMA
Our Reference: DF14/0023
5th September 2014
Planning Secretary Department Of Infrastructure Planning and Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas
Dear Sir/Madam,
RECEIVED ON
10 SEP 2014
DEPARTMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE
PA Ref: 14/00529/D Applicant: La Piazza Limited Proposal: Erection of signage to outside seating area barriers Address: Land In Front Of La Piazza Restaurant Peveril Buildings Loch Promenade Douglas
I refer to the abovementioned planning application.
In accordance with Regulation 14 Paragraph 10 of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 2013, I herewith give notice of the decision as follows.
The application has been refused for the reasons specified in the Inspector's report.
In accordance with Article 14 Paragraph 11(c) of the Regulations, please be advised that the decision of the Council of Ministers is binding and final (subject to the possibility of judicial review by petition of doleance).
The Planning Inspector's report, upon which the decision was determined, may be viewed by visiting http://www.gov.im/categories/planning-and-building-control/planning-development-control/department-applications/departmental-applications-decisions/ or by contacting the office of the Chief Secretary for a hardcopy (Tel 685204).
Yours faithfully,
A Johnstone Planning Appeals Administrator
Creation of outside seating area; Erection of signage to outside seating area barriers; at Land in Front of La Piazza Restaurant, Peveril Buildings, Locts Prontaride, Douglas. Site Visit: Thursday 17^{\text {th }} July
Cabinet Office References D714/0022 and D714/0023 Application Nos 14/00528/B and 14/00529/D Inspector's report
The Highway Authority seek a 3.5 m wide unobstructed pedestrian route, approval of barrier details and that the outside seating should be observable from inside the premises so that staff can supervise the area as if inside the building.
Manx Utility Authority provide technical advice.
PH Isle of Man Ltd object: the application is for an area in front of their own ground floor business, restricting their businesses and risking public confusion. Pavement Café guidelines as per Douglas Development Partnership confirm that the area must be observable from inside the premises, for supervision purposes, which the applicant on the upper floor could not achieve. The guidelines also confirm that the area must be suitable for disabled/wheelchair-bound patrons, whose needs must be met. La Piazza has no ground floor toilet/washroom and facilities at the adjacent bar are not open at the same time as the restaurant. There is no indication of how refuse would be dealt with. It is queried whether the applicant has a license for the existing upper floor outside drinking/smoking area. There are no details regarding late night use or how patrons would be dealt with next to the smoking area outside the bar. There is no evidence of an alcohol license with respect to the proposed outside seating, nor how this would be policed should patrons from the upstairs restaurant move to the proposed area.
Inspector's Assessment
There are here two rival proposals to use the newly created pavement area for outside seating: that subject to this report by Piazza Ltd and that for Pizza Hut on the ground floor, now approved. Each should be determined separately, on its own individual merits, and if both are approved it would be for the parties to resolve the outcome in conjunction with the Highway Authority. There is plainly an element of trade competition behind the submission for PH Isle of Man Ltd (Pizza Hut), not all of which is material to planning.
Assessed on its own merits, this applicant's outside seating area would add vitality and interest to this part of the Promenade, desirably complementing recently undertaken public realm regeneration works. The barrier design is appropriate outside these restaurant premises and sufficient unobstructed passage would remain for passers-by. In these regards the outcome would preserve and in some ways enhance the appearance and commercial character of the Conservation Area. I do, however, have two reservations, the second more serious than the first.
Although it is possible to see the seating area from within the restaurant, this does require standing close to the window, or out on the balcony, and deliberately looking down. There would be little by way of natural surveillance. I do not attach a great deal of weight to this; it is mainly an operational issue for the restaurant, but there is a public interest material to planning in the orderly use of outside seating areas. This might be just a little more difficult to ensure here than at the more usual layout of seating directly outside ground floor premises.
The second issue concerns provision for people with disabilities for whom stairs to upper floor lavatories could be an obstacle or complete barrier. This would be evident in advance to anyone contemplating eating upstairs, with the option not to do so but go elsewhere. As an aside, I imply no criticism in this regard, like many restaurants La Piazza simply occupies long standing premises not built or readily adaptable to meet present day accessibility standards. The point is, however, that this would not necessarily be apparent to someone choosing to sit at an outside table. Only later might they suffer discomfort and/or embarrassment on becoming aware of the arrangement. In my view, a planning approval ought not to endorse
Cebinet Office References DF14/0022 and DF14/0023 Application Nos 14/00528/8 and 14/00525/0 Inspector's report
this prospect. The applicant refers to facilities in the adjacent bar but I saw that this keeps very different opening times, and in particular was not open during the restaurant's lunch period.
In all, on balance I consider that in this instance the planning application should be refused.
Of itself the advertisement consent sought would be innocuous, simply displaying the restaurant's logo on screens enclosing the seating area, without harm to amenity or public safety. However, if the planning application is refused the applicant would neither own nor have control of the site, and for this reason the advertisement consent should also be declined.
Recommendations
I recommend that both applications be refused.
In the event that the Council of Ministers disagrees and determine to grant approval, then I recommend the following conditions in line with those suggested by the Planning Officer.
Planning Application 14/00528/B
The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
The seating area shall be limited to the area shown on Drawing Number HLK/14/0118 1 received by the Department on 30th April 2014.
No customer shall be served or remain in the seating area outside the hours of 0900 to 2200. The seating, tables, barriers and any other articles required for the seating area shall be removed outside those same hours.
Advertisement Application 14/00529/D
The advertisement(s) hereby granted consent shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this notice.
The seating area shall be limited to the area shown on Drawing Number HLK/14/0118 1 received by the Department on 30th April 2014.
Alan Langton
Inspector
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal