12 March 2025 · Delegated - Principal Planner (Jason Singleton)
Manx Wildlife Trust, Thie Vunn, 10, Crown Street, Peel, Isle Of Man, IM5 1aj
The proposal involves retrospective works to renovate a two-storey plus roofspace dwelling on a prominent corner site in the heart of Peel Conservation Area: replacing windows and doors with timber units matching traditional Georgian sash styles, installing conservation-style rooflights, re-roofing with natural slate t…
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The proposals meet the statutory tests of Section 18 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1999 as the alterations preserve and partly enhance the character and appearance of the Peel Conservation Area…
Strategic Policy 4
Requires protection, preservation and enhancement of Conservation Area character and appearance. Officer assessed the renovations as sympathetic in form, using traditional materials, thus protecting, preserving and partly enhancing the area with no adverse townscape impact.
Environment Policy 34
Requires use of traditional materials. Timber for windows/doors/dormers/bay, natural slate roof, conservation rooflights and lime render judged appropriate traditional materials for each element.
Environment Policy 35
Protects Conservation Area character. Alterations judged to comply by replicating existing building form and using traditional materials, preserving area character.
General Policy 2
General development policy. Listed but not specifically assessed; overall compliance inferred from conservation policies and statutory test.
Planning Policy Statement 1/01 - Policy CA/2 (Conservation Areas)
Requires special consideration of impact on conservation area character, including setting and views. Proposals' impact on special character material in assessment; judged appropriate.
no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the proposed use would have a similar or less parking demand compared to the existing use
Highway Services HDC reviewed application 25/90145/B and found no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking due to similar or less parking demand compared to existing use.
Highway Services HDC
No ObjectionAfter reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the propose use would have a similar or less parking demand compared to the existing use.
