Loading document...
Application No.: 25/90039/B Applicant: Sure (Isle Of Man) Ltd Proposal: Replacement of current telegraph pole with 8-meter slimline lattice tower with multiple mobile panel antennas/dishes/radio kit with associated ground equipment cabinets and boundary fence Site Address: Sure Mobile Site Field 435369 Sunnybank Farm Stoney Mountain Road Foxdale Isle Of Man Senior Planning Officer: Jason Singleton Site Visit: 13.02.2025 Expected Decision Level: Officer Delegation Recommended Decision: Permitted Date of Recommendation: 06.03.2025 _________________________________________________________________
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
Reason: To ensure that any redundant infrastructure is removed and to comply with Strategic Plan Infrastructure Policy 3.
Reason: to ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the approved plans in the interests of the visual amenity of the area.
Reason: to prevent the retention on site of temporary works which would be detrimental to the visual amenity of the area.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason.
The proposed application is not considered to harm the use and enjoyment of neighbouring properties nor would it result in any adverse impact upon the rural countryside or its setting and would comply with Spatial Policy 5, General Policy 3, General Policy 2 (b,c,g,m) Environmental Policy 1, 2, 22, and Infrastructure Policy 3 of the IoM Strategic Plan.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This decision relates to drawings and supporting information submitted on 21 January 2025, referenced; IOM_18/010 Rev A
Right to Appeal
It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal: DoI - Highways Services - No objection Malew Parish Commissioners - No objection
_________________________________________________________________ Officer’s Report THE SITE
1.1 The application site is a small parcel of land identified in red that sits to the south of Foxdale Village and within field ref 435369 (approx. 1.69 Acres).The immediate surrounding lands are agricultural fields and Stoney Mountain Plantation immediately to the south of the site. - 1.2 This site is used by Sure Mobile (CURA licensed operator) who is also the applicant and the site contains a concrete hardstanding with an 8m high wooden telegraph pole with 2 x panel antennas, and 2 x 300mm dishes. Within the site compound are two small equipment cabinets and an electrical meter cabinet. The site is fenced off with a 0.85m high earth bund wall with stock proof fencing and a single point of access. The site area measures an overall area of 6.5m x 4.3m. - 1.3 The area where the mast and compound is located is within a copse of trees to the south and adjacent to the field boundary to the south and west. The trees to the south are approx. 5-15m and the hedging on the southern and west boundary varies from 1.2m -1.5m high. THE PROPOSAL
2.1 Planning permission is being sought for the replacement of the current 8m high telegraph pole and the installation of a new 8m high slim line lattice tower on a reinforced concrete slab foundation. The tower would be a triangular shape consisting of three columns with supporting bracing forming the overall structure with a grey galvanised colour. - 2.2 The site extents would be within the existing confines but would feature a 6.5m x 4.3m hardstanding area with stone chippings and timber edges to the front of the site. - 2.3 Mounted to the lattice tower would be: 2x panel antennas; 4x RRU's panel antennas towards the top of the mast and one dish @ 600mm dia. Also proposed are two new equipment cabinets (0.75mx0.75mx1.8m) and an electrical meter cabinet. None of the equipment would be higher than the top of the 8.4m lattice tower. - 2.4 The applicant notes; "The proposed structure will be capable of supporting multiple panel antennas, providing 2G, 3G and 4G/4G+ coverage in the area along with capability to support next generation mobile antenna technology, tower mounted remote radio heads (RRHs) will also be mounted near the new antennas, these are required to support MIMO* on the network…The new proposed structure will also support smaller dishes known as microwave links used as transmission links for the site back to the Sure core network, the proposed design includes 1 microwave links, the size/location of the dishes on the included drawings for this application are indicative until a final vendor decision has been made, final sizes will be confirmed with planning ahead of installation." - 2.5 The application has been submitted by one of the Island's licensed operators (Sure Mobile) and is accompanied by a certificate of compliance with the World Health Organisation's ICNIRP guidelines for public exposure. (ICNIRP - "International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation"). Signed 18/10/24. - 2.6 At present the specification of the 'antennas' specification are not known but the agents confirm; "Equipment Cabinets & Antenna sizes/locations and quantities are indicative as the final vendor decision has not yet been made, sizing will be confirmed with planning ahead of installation". - 2.7 It is to be noted during the decommissioning of the existing and the erection and commissioning of the new mast and equipment, a temporary 8m mast mounted to a wheeled trailer with panel antennas affixed will be installed to the side of the site and fenced off with Heras fencing, all of which will be removed on completion of the new tower.
3.1 08/01262/B - Erection of antennae and formation of communications compound. Approved. - 3.2 In the proximity (130m to the north-east) to this mast is a different mast from another mobile operator ref; 14/00817/TEL - Erection of a replacement 10m high telecommunications monopole accommodating 3 antennas within a glass reinforced plastic shroud. Approved.
4.1 The application site is identified on the Foxdale Local Plan 1999 as "open Space" and within the far corner of the settlement boundary of Foxdale. On the 1982 plan the site is identified as white land or land not zoned for development and within an area of Nature Conservation Zone and site of Ecological importance for conservation. - 4.2 The site is not within a Conservation Area nor is it identified as being in an area at risk of flooding from surface water, river or tidal. There are no registered trees or registered tree groups boarding the site. STRATEGIC PLAN - 4.3 The following policies from the 2016 Strategic Plan are considered pertinent in the assessment of this application; Strategic Policy
Spatial Policy 3 Settlement hierarchy, Foxdale is a named settlement 5 New development will be located within defined settlement.
General Policy
The text preceding Infrastructure Policy 3 is an important consideration where it states in paragraph 11.9.2;
4.6 The Isle of Man government has an overarching series of strategies and policies that are considered materially relevant to the assessment of this application. This includes the Isle of Man Government Climate Change Plan 2022-2027; which promotes a more sustainable approach to living and working, one of which is remote working.
4.7 National Telecommunications Strategy 2018 "The National Telecoms strategy, laid out in six themes, looks to set a direction of travel by which the Island's telecom infrastructure can be recognised as being world class. The Government has made it clear that enhanced telecoms infrastructure is a top priority… The benefits will be available to all our residents and businesses on the Island and will underpin and support economic growth". This document talks broadly about telecoms on Island but geared more towards fibre broadband. - 4.8 IoM Economic Strategy November 2022; Our big Picture Evidence base report phase 1 - December 2021; Para 4.9 (page 147) "Analysis suggest that the overall quality of internet connectivity of the Island is not keeping pace with competitor jurisdictions, such as Jersey and there has been a decline in satisfaction regarding the quality of telecommunication services". REPRESENTATIONS (this report only contain summaries - full reps can be read online)
5.1 Malew Parish Commissioners were consulted on the 05.02.2025 and have not commented at the time of writing. - 5.2 Highways Services do not object (11/02/25)
ASSESSMENT The pertinent issues to consider in the assessment of this planning application are whether there is any adverse impact upon:
6.1 The general principle would comply with Stp1 as the applicants are utilising an area of land where telecommunications infrastructure is already in existence and is set to replace the existing. - 6.2 It is noted that this site sits outside of any defined residential settlement boundary, the nearest being Foxdale. However the proposal would seek to bolster mobile coverage to the neighbouring rural parishes of Malew and Glenfaba. The proposals would also benefit those adjoining town and rural areas where there are many sporadic rural dwellings and agricultural farms that sit within the identified settlement villages in the south (Peel, Foxdale, St.Johns,) as identified in SP2,3 - 6.3 There is allowance in Sp5 for development outside of those identified settlements that are within the countryside that cross references to GP3e for: "location dependant development in connection with working of minerals or the provision of necessary services", an emphasis on necessary services here would be the policy route to follow. - 6.4 As an exception can be found under GP3e and cross referencing with IP3 to ensure there is no visually intrusive masts in sensitive landscapes, all while EP1 seek to protect the countryside and its ecology for its own sake. As such the principle would conform to Sp5 and GP3e with the main focus of this application being on the visual impact of the proposed replacement mast on the rural landscape by installing a 8m slim line lattice tower while considering the general development control principles as discussed below.
6.13 This can be secured through an appropriate worded condition to help reduce the visual impact of the mast and equipment, whilst providing sufficient signal strength for customers to take advantage of a range of Sures' services. In terms of colour it was discussed with the applicants that a green colour would be preferable as the backdrop here when viewed from public vantage points could be read against the rural countryside (agricultural fields) and a back drop of trees when viewed from afar. VISUAL IMPACT - 6.14 General policy 2 ensures any visual impact do not adversely affect the character of the surrounding landscape and equally Environmental Policy 1 ensures there is no adverse visual harm to the wider countryside and its ecology. The opening sentence of Infrastructure Policy 3 is also helpful when balancing the need and any visual impact. The policy narrative helps to ascertain whether the slight increase in height and new design of mast, particularly the upper proportions would be detrimentally to the countryside setting, noting the topography and the land use designations surrounding the site. - 6.15 Following a site visit, the magnitude of the development's intrusion upon the wider landscape setting here would be not be apparent when viewed from those public areas to the North of the site (Foxdale Road). To the south is the backdrop of woodland that is at a much higher height with the topography rising from north to south. On approach to the site from the highway the Manx telecom 10m high monopole (planning ref; 14/00817/TEL) mast is prominent opposite the agricultural building. And the application site is visible at a higher level on the corner of the woodland. - 6.16 When viewed from afar, outside of the site, there are limited public vantage points of the existing mast and any views are generally read within the rural context of the surrounding site. Arguably as the existing equipment is a light grey colour this emphasises its visual appearance and a darker colour would be preferable in this instance. - 6.17 However, where there are very distant views they would be looking towards the wider area, which would see a collection of farm buildings of various sizes and heights, and some rural dwellings. The views of the site would further be read within a collection and back drop of mature trees. Again, at the site visit the current telegraph pole is not readily visible on the wider landscape but it can be depicted when closely looking for it. - 6.18 The proposals would not be seen to be introducing excess levels of development nor be seen as an incongruous feature on the landscape. As such this aspect would comply with Ep1, Ep2 & Gp2b where the proposals would not adversely affect the character of the countryside. RESIDENTIAL AMENITY - 6.19 The application site is in a remote rural setting and there are no residential dwelling within the immediate vicinity that would be impacted by the replacement of the mast and its communication infrastructure. The nearest residential dwellings are Sunnybank to the north east is approx. 210m away and Marsfield approx. 195m away from the site "as the crow flies". It is further noted the Manx Telecom mast is much closer to these dwellings than this site. As such the proposal would comply with GP2g. TREES AND HEDGES
6.2 In terms of whether the proposals will have an impact upon any trees or hedges, given the strategic positioning and the method of installation to utilise the existing concrete base, it is not considered there to be any adverse impact upon any trees, hedges or their roots system within the locality and the proposals would comply with Stp4(b).
6.20 In terms of health issues associated with a telecommunication mast and the proximity to residential dwellings, the Isle of Man has no specific guidelines in how to deal with such
6.2 Equally the proposals would comply with EP22 as it would not be seen to create any statutory nuisance through vibration, odour, noise or light pollution during its operation.
OTHER 6.22 The proposed equipment to be affixed to the mast are shown on the plans with indicative sizes. As such, whilst the principle of the telecom functioning equipment affixed to the mast has been shown and the quantity of units, those specific details can be conditioned to ensure specifics and dimensions are submitted prior to commencement on site to ensure the mast is appropriately utilised for telecommunication equipment as shown/ assessed on the plans.
7.1 Whilst it is acknowledged that the height of the lattice tower will have a limited visual impact in the existing rural setting, it is considered that the proposal would not create any additional visual harm or intrusion into the site and surrounding rural area.
7.2 The benefits of providing the required equipment to increase network coverage are considered to outweigh the limited visual harm resulting from the development, particularly in the context of the Government's ambition to improve public infrastructure and promote remote/home working as part of the Government's plan to achieve net zero status for the Island by 2050 and would conform to those parts of Strategic Policy 1c,4b General Policy 2(b,c,g,m), Environment Policy 1 & 2 and Infrastructure Policy 3 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016, and is recommended for approval with conditions. - 8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE
8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).
8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to:
8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10. - 8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required):
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status, and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 07.03.2025 Determining Officer
Signed : S BUTLER Stephen Butler Head of Development Management
Customer note This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
View as Markdown