7 April 2025 · Delegated - Principal Planner (Jason Singleton)
8, Perwick Road, Port St. Mary, Isle Of Man, IM9 5pa
The proposal involves extending and altering an existing bungalow with a single-storey rear extension (8.5m x 9.6m x 2.9m high flat roof) for lounge, music room and kitchen, a small front garage extension, freestanding timber shed (2m x 3m x 2.56m), rear gym (3.5m x 4m x 2.86m) and sauna (2m x 2m x 2.86m), both with zi…
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer assessed whether the extensions, outbuildings, fencing and heat pump would be suitable in size, scale, massing and architecture for the site without harming streetscene character or neighb…
Environment Policy 22
Relates to impacts of new development on residential amenity. Officer found no undue harm to adjoining/nearby properties due to window orientations, boundary screening, separation from neighbours (e.g. side garden to No.10), and low scale of outbuildings/extension.
Time limit
The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
No significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking, however the front boundary wall should be no higher than 0.6m for access visibility (to be shown on revised plan or conditioned)
No objections
Highway Services HDC does not oppose application 25/90107/B but recommends the front boundary wall be no higher than 0.6m for access visibility; Port St Mary Commissioners had no objections.
Key concern: front boundary wall height for access visibility
Highway Services HDC
Conditional No ObjectionAfter reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking, however the front boundary wall should be no higher than 0.6m in height for access visibility reasons due to the steep driveway – this should be shown on a revised plan or conditioned on permission.
Conditions requested: front boundary wall should be no higher than 0.6m in height for access visibility reasons due to the steep driveway – this should be shown on a revised plan or conditioned on permission
Port St Mary Commissioners
No ObjectionPort St Mary Commissioners had no objections to the following planning applications: 25/90107/B - Thie Ny Marrey, 8 Perwick Road for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwelling, installation of PV solar panels, landscaping work and erection of garden shed
