210957

==== PAGE 1 ====

                                      24/91188/MCH                                     Page  1  of  4

PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Application No. : 24/91188/MCH Applicant : Mr Christopher & Mrs Felicity Blockley Proposal : Minor Changes to PA 20/01534/B - changes to external finishes and materials, additional and enlarged windows Site Address : Ballawill Agneash Isle Of Man IM4 7NS

Planning Officer: Vanessa Porter

Recommendation

Recommended Decision:

Refused Date of Recommendation: 04.11.2024 __

Reasons for Refusal

R : Reasons for Refusal O : Notes attached to reasons

R 1. The following changes are REFUSED:

All changes are refused, proposed works are considered more than minor and would warrant a full application due to the consultation needed for the various proposed aspects and the effect they would have on the original application's conditions. __

Officer’s Report

INTRODUCTION The following application is to be assessed against the criteria set out in Part 3 - Minor Changes Applications of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 specifically Articles 21, 22, 23 and 24.

BASIS OF APPLICATION 21(1) This is the only minor changes application that has been made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval.

PASS - relates to 20/01534/B and no other MCH application shave been received for this application.

21(2)(a) The Minor Change Application relates to the grant of planning approval in respect of a building

PASS - relates to alterations to the dwelling

21(2)(b) The application specifies what minor changes are being sought

PASS - the application form specifies that the application proposes: External finishes - cottage to now be in lime mortar pointed stonework & roof over new extension in zinc standing seam clad Extension to be cladding top half and rendered lower half

==== PAGE 2 ====

                                      24/91188/MCH                                     Page  2  of  4

Additional windows - bedroom 2 North Elevation, Lounge East Elevation, Enlarge window Bed 3 North Elevation Internal layout lounge/ Bed 3 as per PA15/01181/B

21(2)(b) The application specifies why the applicant considers the minor changes to be of a minor nature PASS - the covering letter states, "The changes do not increase or alter the footprint or structural dimensions of the project in any way."

21(2)(c)(i) The Minor Change Application does not increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no increase

21(2)(c)(ii)The Minor Change Application does not increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no increase in floor area

21(2)(c)(iii) The Minor Change Application does not alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line

PASS - no change to site

21(2)(c)(iv) The Minor Change Application does not make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no change to access

21(2)(c)(v) The Minor Change Application does not alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed

FAIL - Condition 3 of PA20/01534/B states, "Prior to commencement, details of the appearance and materials of the Manx stone cladding must be submitted to and approved in writing by the Department. The development shall not be carried out unless in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area."

21(2)(d)The Minor Change Application is not be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired

PASS - original application approved on 18th March 2021

APPLICATION CONTENT

22(3)(a) Application Form

PASS - provided

22(3)(a&c) The information in Schedule 1 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 has been provided:

o Site location plan (with red/blue lines) o The planning approval that is the subject of the application o Explanation of changes being applied for and reasons why o drawings of the proposed minor changes with buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes o Flood risk assessment is not necessary in this case

PASS - provided

22(3)(b) Provision of other documents specified on form but not in Schedule 1

==== PAGE 3 ====

                                      24/91188/MCH                                     Page  3  of  4

- PASS - no additional details needed

22(3)(4) Fee

PASS - Dealt with at submission

22(6) Such further info as Department may request prior to determination (has anything further been requested and provided?)

PASS - no further details required

DETERMINATION

23(1)(a) The Minor Change does not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question

PASS - the proposal does not change the size of the proposal.

23(1)(b) The Minor Change does not significantly change the nature of the development in question

FAIL - the nature of the development has changed due to the appearance of the property changing

23(1)(c) The Minor Change does not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so

PASS - remains compliant

23(1)(d) The Minor Change does not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations)

PASS - there will be no new or increased impacts compared with the parent approval.

23(1)(e) The Minor Change is not more than minor and is not of a magnitude to warrant a new application

PASS - The proposal completely changes the appearance of the property within it's environment and as such is not minor.

23(1)(e)The Minor Change does not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.

FAIL - the previously approved application PA20/01534/B was based on the subordinate nature of the extension and the basis that the proposal appeared as a converted barn, the proposal within this application materially changes this appearance above and beyond minor.

23(2) If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable?

FAIL - the application is recommended for refusal

NOTICE OF DECISION

24(2)(a) Set out whether all or some of the changes are accepted

All changes are not accepted

24(2)(b) Set out whether any elements are refused, the reasons for that.

N/A

__

==== PAGE 4 ====

                                      24/91188/MCH                                     Page  4  of  4

I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.

Decision Made : Refused Date: 05.11.2024

Determining officer Signed : J SINGLETON

Jason Singleton

Principal Planner

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.