208946 — 24/91081/MCH | Planning Portal IoM

==== PAGE 1 ====

                                      24/91081/MCH                                     Page  1  of  4

PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Application No. : 24/91081/MCH Applicant : Mr Doug Skinner Proposal : Minor Change to 20/01465/B - alterations to proposed roof over study to match ridge height of main outbuilding roof, amendments to front and side elevations to suit Site Address : Rose Villa 7 Peveril Road Peel Isle Of Man IM5 1NU

Planning Assistant: Daniel Spencer

Recommendation

Recommended Decision:

Refused Date of Recommendation: 07.10.2024 __

Reasons for Refusal

R : Reasons for Refusal O : Notes attached to reasons

R 1. All changes are rejected. The increase in height of the roof is considered more than minor and could have potential impacts on neighbours and the street scene of a conservation area which would need accessing under a full application. __

Officer’s Report

INTRODUCTION

The following application is to be assessed against the criteria set out in Part 3 - Minor Changes Applications of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 specifically Articles 21, 22, 23 and 24.

BASIS OF APPLICATION

Previous Applications

21(1) At least one of the following applies:

this is the only minor changes application that has been made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval;
any previous minor changes application has been either refused or withdrawn;
the minor changes application seeks approval only for the installation of low carbon technology; or
all previous minor changes applications have related solely to the installation of a low carbon technology.

==== PAGE 2 ====

                                      24/91081/MCH                                     Page  2  of  4

- PASS - relates to 20/01465/B

Low Carbon Technology and Permitted Development

21(3) The application relate to the approval of low carbon technology and would it be Permitted Development if the building which it is to serve were substantially complete (if this test is passed, ignore section 3).

N/A

Limitations on when a Minor Change Application may be made

21(2)(a) The Minor Change Application relates to the grant of planning approval in respect of a building

PASS - relates to the conversion existing outbuildings

21(2)(b) The application specifies what minor changes are being sought

PASS - changes being applied for are alterations to proposed roof over study to match ridge height of main outbuilding roof, amendments to front and side elevations to suit.

21(2)(b) The application specifies why the applicant considers the minor changes to be of a minor nature

Pass - included in the cover letter.

21(2)(c)(i) The Minor Change Application does not increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no increase

21(2)(c)(ii)The Minor Change Application does not increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted where this would increase the total floor plan by more than 5% or result in any part of the development being located closer to the curtilage of an adjacent dwelling.

PASS - no increase beyond threshold

21(2)(c)(iii) The Minor Change Application does not alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line

PASS - no change to site

21(2)(c)(iv) The Minor Change Application does not make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - No changes

21(2)(c)(v) The Minor Change Application does not alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed

PASS - No changes

21(2)(d)The Minor Change Application is not be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired

PASS - original application approved 02.03.2021.

APPLICATION CONTENT

==== PAGE 3 ====

                                      24/91081/MCH                                     Page  3  of  4

22(3)(a) Application Form

o Site location plan (with red/blue lines) o The planning approval that is the subject of the application o Explanation of changes being applied for and reasons why o IF relevant, drawings of the proposed minor changes with buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes o Flood risk assessment is not necessary in this case

PASS - provided

22(3)(b) Provision of other documents specified on form but not in Schedule 1

PASS - No other documents provided

22(3)(4) Fee

PASS - Dealt with at submission

22(6) Such further info as Department may request prior to determination (has anything further been requested and provided?

PASS - None requested

DETERMINATION

23(1)(a) The Minor Change does not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question

FAIL - the increase of the roof height to match the rear height would result in a significant increase of size and scale of the front portion of the proposal.

23(1)(b) The Minor Change does not significantly change the nature of the development in question

PASS - nature of original development is not changed

23(1)(c) The Minor Change does not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so

PASS - remains compliant

23(1)(d) The Minor Change does not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties or highway safety or having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations)

PASS - there will be no new or increased impacts compared with the parent approval.

23(1)(e) The Minor Change is not more than minor and is not of a magnitude to warrant a new application

FAIL - The increase in height of the roof to match the rear height would be considered more than minor.

==== PAGE 4 ====

                                      24/91081/MCH                                     Page  4  of  4

23(1)(f)The Minor Change does not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.

PASS - basis of original approval remains unchanged

23(2) If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable?

FAIL - Unacceptable, the increase in height of the roof is considered more than minor and could have potential impacts on neighbours and the street scene of a conservation area which would need accessing under a full application.

NOTICE OF DECISION

24(2)(a) Set out whether all or some of the changes are accepted

All changes are rejected

24(2)(b) Set out whether any elements are refused, the reasons for that.

N/A __

I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Acting Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.

Decision Made: Refused

Date: 07.10.2024

Determining officer

Signed : A MORGAN Abigail Morgan Acting Head of Development Management

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.