Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
24/91081/MCH Page 1 of 4
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 24/91081/MCH Applicant : Mr Doug Skinner Proposal : Minor Change to 20/01465/B - alterations to proposed roof over study to match ridge height of main outbuilding roof, amendments to front and side elevations to suit Site Address : Rose Villa 7 Peveril Road Peel Isle Of Man IM5 1NU
Planning Assistant: Daniel Spencer
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Refused Date of Recommendation: 07.10.2024 __
Reasons for Refusal
R : Reasons for Refusal O : Notes attached to reasons
R 1. All changes are rejected. The increase in height of the roof is considered more than minor and could have potential impacts on neighbours and the street scene of a conservation area which would need accessing under a full application. __
Officer’s Report
INTRODUCTION
The following application is to be assessed against the criteria set out in Part 3 - Minor Changes Applications of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 specifically Articles 21, 22, 23 and 24.
BASIS OF APPLICATION
21(1) At least one of the following applies:
==== PAGE 2 ====
24/91081/MCH Page 2 of 4
- PASS - relates to 20/01465/B
21(3) The application relate to the approval of low carbon technology and would it be Permitted Development if the building which it is to serve were substantially complete (if this test is passed, ignore section 3).
N/A
PASS - relates to the conversion existing outbuildings
PASS - changes being applied for are alterations to proposed roof over study to match ridge height of main outbuilding roof, amendments to front and side elevations to suit.
Pass - included in the cover letter.
21(2)(c)(i) The Minor Change Application does not increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted
PASS - no increase
21(2)(c)(ii)The Minor Change Application does not increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted where this would increase the total floor plan by more than 5% or result in any part of the development being located closer to the curtilage of an adjacent dwelling.
PASS - no increase beyond threshold
PASS - no change to site
21(2)(c)(iv) The Minor Change Application does not make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted
PASS - No changes
PASS - No changes
21(2)(d)The Minor Change Application is not be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired
PASS - original application approved 02.03.2021.
APPLICATION CONTENT
==== PAGE 3 ====
24/91081/MCH Page 3 of 4
22(3)(a) Application Form
o Site location plan (with red/blue lines) o The planning approval that is the subject of the application o Explanation of changes being applied for and reasons why o IF relevant, drawings of the proposed minor changes with buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes o Flood risk assessment is not necessary in this case
PASS - provided
PASS - No other documents provided
PASS - Dealt with at submission
22(6) Such further info as Department may request prior to determination (has anything further been requested and provided?
PASS - None requested
DETERMINATION
23(1)(a) The Minor Change does not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question
FAIL - the increase of the roof height to match the rear height would result in a significant increase of size and scale of the front portion of the proposal.
23(1)(b) The Minor Change does not significantly change the nature of the development in question
PASS - nature of original development is not changed
23(1)(c) The Minor Change does not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so
PASS - remains compliant
PASS - there will be no new or increased impacts compared with the parent approval.
23(1)(e) The Minor Change is not more than minor and is not of a magnitude to warrant a new application
FAIL - The increase in height of the roof to match the rear height would be considered more than minor.
==== PAGE 4 ====
24/91081/MCH Page 4 of 4
23(1)(f)The Minor Change does not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.
PASS - basis of original approval remains unchanged
23(2) If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable?
FAIL - Unacceptable, the increase in height of the roof is considered more than minor and could have potential impacts on neighbours and the street scene of a conservation area which would need accessing under a full application.
NOTICE OF DECISION
All changes are rejected
N/A __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Acting Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.
Decision Made: Refused
Date: 07.10.2024
Determining officer
Signed : A MORGAN Abigail Morgan Acting Head of Development Management
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal