Loading document...
31 DEC 2012
Olk yn Ard-Scrudeyr
Our Ref: DF12/0023 Planning Application Ref.No: 12/01209/C
THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1999
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT (PROCEDURE ORDER) 2005
Planning Secretary Department of Infrastructure Planning and Building Control Division Murray House Mount Havelock Douglas
| Applicant: | Heron & Brearley Ltd | | --- | --- | | Proposal: | Creation of outside seating area, Artisan 28 Victoria Street Douglas Isle Of Man IM1 2LE |
In accordance with paragraph 10 of the above Order, the person appointed by the Council of Ministers to consider this application has submitted his report. In accordance with paragraph 10.3(a) and (b), a copy of the appointed persons report is enclosed. On the 20th December 2012, and after consultation, the Council of Ministers accepted the recommendation contained within that report and the application was approved subject to the conditions specified below.
| Date of Issue: 24th December 2012 | | | --- | --- | | Chief Secretary's Office | | | Government Offices | | | Bucks Road | | | Douglas | |
Mr W Greenhow ACMA Chief Secretary
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Refs; DF12/0023 & DF12/0024 31 DEC 2012 Applications 12/01209/C & 12/01210/D DEPARTMENT OF REFARTMENTS Refs: DF12/0023 & DF/12/0024 Application Nos: 12/01209/C & 12/01210/D
Written representation case: Site Inspection held on 19 November 2012 Applications by: Heron and Brearley for (A) planning approval for the creation of an outside seating area (the planning application) and (B) advertisement consent for the installation of demarcation barriers with signage (the advertisement consent application) both at Artisan, 28 Victoria Street, Douglas, Isle of Man.
The site lies in an area of Douglas which is designated as Predominantly Offices by the Douglas Local Plan (Map No 1). However, immediately to the east the land use designation changes to Predominantly Shopping.
The relevant policies are contained within the Isle of Man Strategic Plan, 2007 (IOMSP). Environment Policy 35 (relating to Conservation areas) and Transport Policy 6 (relating to the needs of pedestrians and other road users) are relevant to both the planning application and the advertisement consent application. In addition Environment Policy 37 (advertisements within conservation areas) is relevant in relation to the advertisement consent application.
The planning authority statement also refers to Environment Policy 38 but the wording of this policy relates to 'Advertisements close to conservation areas'. This proposed advertisement lies within the conservation area.
The main issues in both cases are firstly, the effect that proposal would have on the character and appearance of the Atholl/Victoria Street Conservation Area and, secondly, the effect on traffic and pedestrian safety.
The principle of an outdoor seating area is acceptable and this proposal aims to follow the basic principles set out in the guidelines on the use of the Public Highway for Pavement Cafes. Similar proposals have been approved within the conservation area and this part of Douglas. Having seen this modest proposal, with its two tables, four chairs and restrained advertising which matches the existing signage, I consider that the character and appearance of the Atholl/Victoria Street Conservation Area would be preserved by the scheme.
The proposal would add interest and vitality to the street scene, as well as providing economic and social benefits generally. On the first issue, therefore, I find that the proposal would accord with the aims of policies EP35 and EP37 of the IOMSP 2007.
On the second issue the Highways Division is concerned that in servicing the two tables the operators of the café would stray into the footway area to the detriment of the free flow of pedestrians and that this could affect the safety of those using the footway. However, it would appear from the submitted drawings that a retained pavement width of just over 2.4 m could be achieved. This is 400 mm in excess of the normally required pavement width. If this width can be retained (and the operators indicate that this is the case) then the proposal would be acceptable.
The Highways Division seems to have based its case on a food table size of 850 mm (in diameter) and a useable space of an outside seating area being 1.6 m wide. However the 1:50 scale submitted drawing clearly shows that the table diameter is less than 850 mm and the maximum distance from the outside wall of the building to the outside edge of the barrier base would be less than 1.5 m . It would appear, therefore that there would be more than a 2 m width of pavement remaining.
The operator is convinced that they would have adequate space to service each table from within the barrier and I have no reason to question this. A waiter could easily service each of the tables, in my view, without the need to use any more of the pavement width than that within the barriers. I consider that the amount of space proposed for the café area is sufficient to allow the café to function without detrimentally affecting pedestrian movements or their safety along Victoria Street.
In conclusion, therefore, I consider that the proposals for the outdoor seating area and the display of the barrier advertisement stands accord with Policies Environment Policy 35 (relating to Conservation areas) and Transport Policy 6 (relating to the needs of pedestrians and other road users) and that, in addition the proposed advertisement accords with Environment Policy 37 (advertisements within conservation areas).
It follows that planning approval and advertisement consent should be granted. In both cases I consider that the conditions suggested by the planning authority are necessary and appropriate. In addition I consider it necessary that a drawing to a scale of 1:20 showing the precise dimensions of the seating area be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning authority. This will enable the Highway Division to take any necessary appropriate action if the use of the area extends any further on to the pavement.
I recommend that planning approval be granted for the creation of an outside seating area at Artisan, 28 Victoria Street, Douglas, Isle of Man, in accordance with the application dated 15 August 2012 and subject to the following conditions:
The development hereby approved shall commence before the expiry of four years from the date of this decision.
This approval relates to the creation of an outside seating area as shown on drawing Nos 205, 206, ART-EX01, ART-EX02, ART-EX03, ART-EX04 and ART-EX05 all received on 31 August 2012.
Prior to any works commencing a drawing to the scale of 1:20 indicating the precise dimensions of the outside seating area and advertisement stands and banners shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the planning authority. The outdoor seating area, advertisement signs and banners shall be retained within the space and to the dimensions shown on the approved drawing.
Anthony J Wharton BArch RIBA RIAS MRTPI Inspector
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal