1 October 2025
The Forge, East Quay, Peel, Isle Of Man, IM5 1ar
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
Environment Policy 35
Development within Conservation Area must preserve or enhance character/appearance. Objectors argue proposal harms character with modern industrial design, increased massing, and intensification of inappropriate use.
General Policy 2
Requires positive environmental impact, acceptable highway/parking impact (GP2h,i). Objectors cite visual harm (GP2b,c,g), intensification without parking.
Environmental Policy 39
Presumes against demolition of buildings making positive contribution in Conservation Area. Objectors note demolition without acceptable replacement.
Transport Policy 4
Acceptable highway safety impact. Objectors challenge Highway Services, cite mezzanine increasing demand.
Transport Policy 7
Adequate parking unless demonstrated otherwise. Objectors reference industrial parking standards and Strategic Plan p138 on mezzanines.
No significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the proposed use would have a similar less parking demand and operation to the existing use.
Multiple public objections to planning application 25/90645/B for a replacement two-storey commercial unit in Peel's Conservation Area, citing loss of historic access, harm to heritage character, overbearing impact, inadequate parking, and conflict with local policies encouraging industrial relocation.
Key concern: Loss of historic rear access to 17th-century buildings at 27/29 Castle Street for essential maintenance and emergencies
Resident of 29 Castle Street
Objection**OBJECTION**; the only way to the back of No27 and No29 can be accessed to carry out repairs is between the Stable Room and Harness Room; ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT ALTERS THE LOADING ON THE GROUND NEARBY WOULD NEED A FULL ENGINEERING SURVEY; TO ALLOW THIS HUGE BUILDING TO BE BUILT OFF A SMALL LANE WITHOUT PROPER PARKING FACILITIES WOULD GO AGAINST THE PLAN
Sarah Corlett Town Planning Consultancy Ltd on behalf of owners of 27 & 29 Castle Street
ObjectionOBJECTION TO 25/90645/B; The proposed increase in height of the buildings on the site will adversely affect the outlook from both of these properties; the proposal not only does neither but would harm the character of the area by introducing a modern building which would ordinarily be found on an industrial estate
Resident of 27 Castle Street
ObjectionWe, the undersigned, feel we must object strongly; The height of the garden wall now is approx. 3.76 metres. The proposed building height of the industrial unit is 6.337 metres
Resident of 27 Castle Street challenging Highway Services
ObjectionWe write to question this statement and its findings; On page 138 of the strategic plan 2016, it states where mezzanine levels are proposed... the Department may require additional car parking
Resident of 29 Castle Street challenging Highway Services
ObjectionWe write to question this statement and its findings
Resident of 103 Ballabrooie Avenue
ObjectionI wish to object to this application 25/90645/b
Resident of Willesden, Tynwald Road, Peel
ObjectionI object to this application on the grounds it does not comply with the following policies; The access was through the passage way between the OLD HARNESS ROOM and STABLE ROOM
