369482

==== PAGE 1 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  1  of  12

PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Application No. : 25/90528/B Applicant : Mr Matt Newing Proposal : Conversion of redundant outbuildings into dwelling, erection of detached double garage, alterations to yard and associated site works (UNIT 2) Site Address : Grange Barn The Grange Clypse Moar Road Onchan Isle Of Man IM4 5BG

Principal Planner: Chris Balmer Photo Taken :

Site Visit :

Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation

Recommendation

Recommended Decision:

Permitted Date of Recommendation: 26.09.2025 __

Conditions and Notes for Approval

C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions

C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.

Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.

C 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (Permitted Development) Order 2025 (or any Order revoking and/or re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no extension, enlargement or other alteration of the dwelling(s) hereby approved, other than that expressly authorised by this approval, shall be carried out, without the prior written approval of the Department.

Reason: To control development in the interests of the amenities of the surrounding area.

C 3. For the avoidance of doubt the residential curtilage (i.e. land attached to and around the dwelling for example gardens, driveway & dwelling) does not include any part of Field 534630 as shown on approved drawing 6B. Any change of use of this field from agricultural use will require further planning approval.

Reason: the residential curtilage proposed has been considered acceptable, but such consideration has not been given to include Field 534630.

==== PAGE 2 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  2  of  12

C 4. No development shall commence until a schedule of materials and finishes and samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces, including roofs, have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Department. The development shall not be carried out unless in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: In the interests of the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area.

C 5. All planting, seeding or turfing comprised in the approved details (drawing 6B) of landscaping must be carried out in the first planting and seeding seasons following the completion of the development or the occupation of the dwelling, whichever is the sooner. Any trees or plants which die or become seriously damaged or diseased must be replaced in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species

Reason: To ensure the provision of an appropriate landscape setting to the development and for biodiversity net gain.

C 6. The hard landscaping works including all paving, fences (including the 1.2m high timber post and wire fence along the eastern boundary with Field 534630 and along western boundary all as shown on drawing 6B shall be completed in full accordance with the approved details prior to the first occupation of the dwelling and retained thereafter.

Reason: To ensure the provision of an appropriate landscape setting to the development and adequate access and parking provision is provided to serve the dwelling.

C 7. Prior to the occupation of the dwelling hereby approved the bat and bird boxes shall be installed as shown on drawing no. 8A and retained thereafter.

Reason; In the interest of ecology/Protect Species.

C 8. No external lighting shall be installed unless a sensitive lighting plan, following best practise as detailed in the Bat Conservation Trust and Institute of Lighting Professionals Guidance Note 8/23 on Bats and Artificial Lighting (2023), has been submitted in writing to the Department for approval and these approved details shall be fully adhered to and retained thereafter.

Reason; In the interest of ecology/Protect Species.

N 1. If bats, or evidence of bats (such as droppings), and/or bird nests are discovered or breeding birds are suspected at any point, all work must stop and advice be sought from the DEFA Ecosystem Policy Team 01624 651577, or from the Manx Bat Group Help Line 07624 366177.

This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. Overall, it is considered the proposed works would not adversely affect the countryside, have no adverse impact upon any protected species/trees; and have no significant impacts upon private or public amenities and therefore comply with HP 11 and EP 1, 4 & 5, TP 4 & 7 and GP2 of the IOM Strategic Plan 2016.

==== PAGE 3 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  3  of  12

Plans/Drawings/Information;

This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawings reference numbers all received;

02.09.2025 8A REV 9A Bat Survey Report - Ref:- KPW-25/90528/-3

02.06.2025 1 5 6B 7 10

Bat Survey Letter EV details Existing Site Photographs Heat Pump Details Tree Felling Licence Application Form Manx Bird Life Report Planning Statement Structural Engineer Report

__

Right to Appeal

It is recommended that the following organisations should NOT be given the Right to Appeal:

DOI Highway Services - No Objection Local Authority - No Objection __

Officer’s Report

1.0 THE SITE 1.1 The application site represents the central part of the curtilage of The Grange, Clypse Moar Road, Onchan (Unit 2). This is a residential property (within blue line) which is located to the south of the application site. The application site is located centrally within the overall holding. The site is accesses via the Clypse Moar Road which is located to the south of the site. The main private entrance to The Grange is located at the northern end of the Clypse Moar Road. The private driveway which serves the site is approximately 180m long. The Clypse Reservoir is located to the east of the site.

1.2 The application site includes two outbuildings, land surrounding these buildings and to east of these outbuildings includes the southern section of Field 53460.

==== PAGE 4 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  4  of  12

2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The application seeks approval for the conversion of redundant outbuildings into dwelling, erection of detached double garage, alterations to yard and associated site works (UNIT 2).

2.2 The larger of the two barns has an "L-shaped" footprint and is a two storey Manx stone barn. The second smaller barn is linear in footprint and is also constructed/finished in Manx Stone. The barns have a roof finishes of slate and corrugated metal sheeting. The two barn are no physically attached or linked.

2.3 The proposal is to erect a single storey glazed linked extension (porch) to connect both barns to form a single dwelling. The proposals include the re building of the majority of the south elevations (front) of the larger two storey barn. Further rebuilding works are to parts of the west elevation (lounge), where the existing single storey walls would be rebuilt with a cat slide roof added.

2.4 A detached single storey double garage is proposed along the southern boundary of the site.

2.5 The proposed residential curtilage includes the barns, detached garage, garden (front/side), driveway to the south of the barns and the rear garden with a depth of between 8.6m and 10.5m up to the boundary with Field 534630. This field is not part of the residential curtilage. A 1.2m high post and wire fence is proposed to separate the rear garden and Field 534630. Furthermore, Field 534263 to the west of the site is also not within the residential curtilage of the site.

2.6 A new underground Biodisc tank is proposed to serve the property for foul drainage. The surface water is proposed to be connected to site soakaways or into the existing water courses if available.

3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 The following planning applications are considered relevant in the determination of the application;

3.2 Conversion of redundant outbuilding into dwelling, demolition of former pigsty, erection of detached triple garage and formation of new access lane (UNIT 1) - 25/90529/B - PENDING CONSIDERATION.

4.0 PLANNING POLICY 4.1 The site lies within an area zoned as an "not zoned for a particular purpose" on the Area Plan for the East. The site is not within a Conservation Area, Flood Zone, nor an area zoned as High Landscape or Coastal Value and Scenic Significance. The site is within an area of "Unsuitable for development, danger of pollution to water supply" due to the Clypse Reservoir to the east of the site.

4.2 The following policies are taken from the IOM Strategic Plan 2016 and are relevant for consideration:

4.3 Environment Policy 1 states: "The countryside and its ecology will be protected for its own sake. For the purposes of this policy, the countryside comprises all land which is outside the settlements defined in Appendix 3 at A.3.6 or which is not designated for future development on an Area Plan. Development which would adversely affect the countryside will not be permitted unless there is an over-riding national need in land use planning terms which

==== PAGE 5 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  5  of  12

outweighs the requirement to protect these areas and for which there is no reasonable and acceptable alternative".

4.4 Environment Policy 4 states: Development will not be permitted which would adversely affect: (a) species and habitats of international importance: (i) protected species of international importance or their habitats; or (ii) proposed or designated Ramsar and Emerald Sites or other internationally important sites. (b) species and habitats of national importance: (i) protected species of national importance or their habitats; (ii) proposed or designated National Nature Reserves, or Areas of Special Scientific Interest; or (iii) Marine Nature Reserves; or (iv) National Trust Land.

(c) species and habitats of local importance such as Wildlife Sites, local nature reserves, priority habitats or species identified in any Manx Biodiversity Action Plan which do not already benefit from statutory protection, Areas of Special Protection and Bird Sanctuaries and landscape features of importance to wild flora and fauna by reason of their continuous nature or function as a corridor between habitats. Some areas to which this policy applies are identified as Areas of Ecological Importance or Interest on extant Local or Area Plans, but others, whose importance was not evident at the time of the adoption of the relevant Local or Area Plan, are not, particularly where that plan has been in place for many years. In these circumstances, the Department will seek site specific advice from the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry if development proposals are brought forward.

4.5 Environment Policy 5 states: "In exceptional circumstances where development is allowed which could adversely affect a site recognised under Environmental Policy 4, conditions will be imposed and/or Planning Agreements sought to: (a) minimise disturbance; (b) conserve and manage its ecological interest as far as possible; and (c) where damage is unavoidable, provide new or replacement habitats so that the loss to the total ecological resource is mitigated."

4.6 Housing Policy 11 states: "Conversion of existing rural buildings into dwellings may be permitted, but only where: (a) redundancy for the original use can be established; (b) the building is substantially intact and structurally capable of renovation; (c) the building is of architectural, historic, or social interest; (d) the building is large enough to form a satisfactory dwelling, either as it stands or with modest, subordinate extension which does not affect adversely the character or interest of the building; (e) residential use would not be incompatible with adjoining established uses or, where appropriate, land-use zonings on the area plan; and (f) the building is or can be provided with satisfactory services without unreasonable public expenditure. Such conversion must: (a) where practicable and desirable, re-establish the original appearance of the building and (b) use the same materials as those in the existing building.

Permission will not be given for the rebuilding of ruins or the erection of replacement buildings of similar or even identical form.

Further extension of converted rural buildings will not usually be permitted, since this would lead to loss or reduction of the original interest and character."

==== PAGE 6 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  6  of  12

4.7 Transport Policy 4 states: "The new and existing highways which serve any new development must be designed so as to be capable of accommodating the vehicle and pedestrian journeys generated by that development in a safe and appropriate manner, and in accordance with the environmental objectives of this plan."

4.8 Transport Policy 7 states: "The Department will require that in all new development, parking provision must be in accordance with the Department's current standards.

The current standards are set out in Appendix 7."

4.9 General Policy 2 states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption."

4.10 The following policies are taken from the Area Plan for the East 2021 and are relevant for consideration:

4.11 Natural Environment Recommendation 2 states: "It is recommended that ahead of making any applications for development close to the reservoirs, watercourses and wetlands in the East, applicants must discuss such proposals with DEFA to establish the need for specific design elements to be taken into account. This may include: the impact of artificial light from the development on migratory fish species, buffer distances from the river bank and visual amenity.

5.0 REPRESENTATIONS AND CONSULTATIONS 5.1 Highway Services (DOI) comments (05.06.2025): "After reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking."

5.2 Ecosystem Policy Team initially objected due to lack of information (13.06.2025). However, after additional information being provided they made the following comments (18.09.2025 & 22.09.2025);

22.09.2025

==== PAGE 7 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  7  of  12

"Forward to the below, and apologies because I was getting confused between the drawings for Unit 1 and Unit 2, but the correct drawing number for the Proposed Site Plans for Unit 2 should be 8A (not 2A)."

18.09.2025 "General Stance No objection subject to condition

Detailed Comments The Ecosystem Policy Team can confirm that the Manx Bat Group's (MBG) Bat Survey Report relating to Unit 2 of the Grange, is all in order and that a suitable level of assessment has been undertaken. The MBG found no evidence of bats within Unit 2 and determined that the buildings are not being used as bat roosts currently. However, a brown long-eared bat roost was found in Unit 1 of the Grange, and the works on Unit 2 have the potential to impact upon the bats and their roost space and so the MBG recommended a number of avoidance measures in their report which must be followed. This includes recommendations in relation to responsible external lighting. The Proposed Garage Plans show the creation of a dedicated bat roost within the roof void of the new double garage. As no bats were found in Unit 2, this roost space may be seen as an enhancement for bats. However, this dedicated loft space may be required as mitigation for the loss of the current bat roost in Unit 1, depending on the timing of demolition, conversion and re-building (the bats need to be provided with a like for like roost space, prior to their current roost space being lost). Details of this are outside the scope of this Planning consideration and will need to be discussed and agreed in writing with the Ecosystem Policy Team prior to works on the bat roost taking place. The Ecosystem Policy Team are therefore not requesting a condition for this loft space to created, but it may still be required. The Proposed Site Plans show 2 wooden bat boxes positioned on the south and east elevation of the main dwelling, which will provide mitigation for the loss of any seasonal bat roosts, which due to the habits of bats, may not have been occupied at the time of the bat surveys. The Ecosystem Policy Team can confirm that Manx BirdLife's Bird Survey is all in order and that a suitable level of assessment has been undertaken. The bird surveys were not undertaken during the main breeding bird season and due to safety concerns all areas of the buildings could not be examined, but evidence of previous nesting was found. The Proposed Site Plans show a number of bird boxes to be erected around the main dwelling and these will provide mitigation for the loss of any nest sites. As far as we can determine, there is to be no tree or other habitat removal required to facilitate the works, though works will take place in close proximity to trees and hedges and so suitable protection measures should be employed. Mitigation is therefore not required but we would welcome the inclusion of the native hedge between Units 1 and 2 as an enhancement for wildlife. Due to the countryside location of the property, planting with native or other well established species is appropriate.

Potential conditions Bat and bird boxes to be erected as per the Proposed Site Plans (Drawing no. 8A). No external lighting to be installed unless a sensitive lighting plan, following best practise as detailed in the Bat Conservation Trust and Institute of Lighting Professionals Guidance Note 8/23 on Bats and Artificial Lighting (2023), has been submitted to Planning and approved in writing.

Additional Information Bats Though the Manx Bat Group found no evidence of roosting bats within Unit 2, the applicant should note that bats are mobile creatures and move between their roosts, and can become resident in new roosts, depending on their seasonal needs. Any changes in conditions of the

==== PAGE 8 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  8  of  12

Unit 2 buildings may also make conditions more suitable for bats. Bats could therefore be present in Unit 2 at the time of works, even though they were not found by the Manx Bat Group at the time of their surveys. We applicant must therefore make thorough checks for bats around the building prior to demolition. If bats, or evidence of bats (such as droppings), at any point, all work must stop and advice be sought from the DEFA Ecosystem Policy Team 01624 651577, or from the Manx Bat Group Help Line 07624 366177. We also advise that soft demolition working practises should be adopted to avoid impacts on bat roosts which may not have previously been identified- the stripping of roof tiles should be undertaken by hand, or where necessary with the assistance of hand-held tools and machinery. Materials should be removed carefully away, and not rolled, compressed, levered or sprung to avoid potential harm to bats which may be present underneath. The undersides of materials should be checked for bats before removal or disposal. The applicants must ensure that the measures contained in section 6 of the MBGs report are followed, in order to avoid impacts on bats.

Birds Manx BirdLife's survey report included a number of avoidance measures which must be followed to ensure that bird's and their active nests, eggs and chicks are not, harmed, disturbed or blocked during the works - these measures include undertaking checks for bird's nests in the dense ivy prior to its removal (whatever time of year the ivy removal is to take place due to the potential presence of wood pigeon), and timing the works to avoid the main nesting season. Should the applicant wish to start building works within the main nesting season (March to August inclusive) we recommend that steps are taken over winter to prevent bird access to potential nest sites through blocking. Thorough checks for bats must take place prior to any blocking.

If a nest is discovered, or breeding birds are suspected, at any point, work must stop and advice be sought from the Ecosystem Policy Team."

5.3 Onchan Commissioners comment (19.06.2025): "I am directed to advise you that the above application was considered at the Ordinary Meeting of Onchan District Commissioners held on Monday 16th June 2025. The Board of Onchan District Commissioners would recommend that the application be APPROVED for planning purposes only."

6.0 ASSESSMENT 6.1 When considering the proposal the following material planning matters should be considered; o Compliance with Housing Policy 11 o Potential impacts upon the Countryside/landscape (EP1 & 2); o Access arrangements/parking (GP2 & TP 7); and o Impacts upon Ecology / Trees.

6.2.1 COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSING POLICY 11

6.2.2 There are a number of criteria when considering the conversion of rural building into dwellings and Housing Policy 11 is relevant.

6.2.3 With regard to paragraph (a) of Housing policy 11, the barns are clearly not used for its original purposes and has not been for a number of decades and therefore it is clearly redundant. It is therefore considered that redundancy has been established and the proposal conforms to Housing Policy 11 in this respect. Further, it is generally accepted that such barns which were originally constructed for agricultural use, do not meet current modern agricultural standards animal welfare.

==== PAGE 9 ====

                                                 25/90528/B
                                 Page  9  of  12

6.2.4 With regard to paragraph (b), this deals with whether the building is substantially intact and structurally capable of renovation. A structural report is included, which concludes:

"External The cracking, distortion, and loss of mortar evident generally to barn 2 were a culmination of lack of maintenance and lack of diaphragm action from the now collapsed floors and roofs. However, barn 1, with its intact roof, appeared stable, but will distort over time with the loss of the first floor.

External stone walls should be re-pointed externally and be entirely cement rendered internally, prior to construction of a new internal masonry lining wall, built up off a new thickened concrete ground floor slab.

The front wall of building 2, facing the courtyard in unstable and should be carefully demolished and rebuilt on a new concrete strip foundation. The work should be carried out in small sections at a time, to be agreed and with the existing adjacent stone walls securely propped up to prevent fall.

All existing roof structures are to be removed and replaced with new pitched slate roofs, built in accordance with building control standards."

6.2.5 And

"Main Conclusion Although the barns appear to be in a poor state of repair, using specialist temporary works designs coupled with a detailed demolition method of working, it is, in our opinion that these buildings are capable of being renovated and structurally suitable for conversion, to form a domestic residential property.

The building works as indicated on the proposed drawings would not destabilise or affect the structural integrity of the building.

It is relevant that the proposed scheme will include provision for:

Construction of new replacement ground and upper floor structures throughout.

Work relating to strengthening of the existing external stone walls.

Provision of new replacement pitched slate roof structures.

Provision of new rainwater goods and underground drainage system."

6.2.6 The structural report indicates that the barns generally are capable of retention and converted as proposed. It is noted that the southern front elevation of the larger barn requires to be built which does weight against the proposal. The proposal is to replace this wall with an external finish of Manx stone to match the existing. Therefore once finished this element would appear similar to the existing. The majority of the existing historical built form is capable for conversion. Accordingly, while the proposal could be considered to be contrary to HP11 in this respect, it is concluded that given the majority is be reused the proposal is acceptable in this case.

6.2.7 With regard to paragraph (c) of Housing policy 11, the existing barns are constructed of Manx stone and are considered to have the appearance, age and character to have an overall architectural interest to warrant its retention and therefore complies with this aspect of Housing Policy 11.

==== PAGE 10 ====

                                                 25/90528/B                                      Page  10  of  12

6.2.8 Accordingly, it is considered in this case the two barns collectively have sufficient architectural interest to warrant its retention.

6.2.9 With regard to paragraph (d) of Housing Policy 11 this policy states that the building should be large enough to form a satisfactory dwelling, either as it stands or with modest, subordinate extension which does not affect adversely the character or interest of the building.

6.2.10 The proposal is to convert the existing built fabric of the barns and retained the method of opening and overall appearance. A modest single storey glazed extension to link the two barns and the rebuilding of a single storey element to the west elevations is proposed. However, the extension in relation to the rest of the built area is very small in size. Overall, the form and appearance will appear as existing. The proposal involves the re use of existing opening for widows/doors with some additional openings. However, the overall appearance of irregular sizes and position of windows would be retained. Perhaps the largest change would be the instruction of rooflights to a number of the roof planes and solar panels to southern elevation. While these are more domestic features, it is considered the benefits of light / sustainable objectives outweigh this initial concern.

6.2.11 Overall, it is considered the proposed design and approach in terms of the use of materials, proportion, form and size of the works; would all not affect adversely the character or interest of the barns and therefore comply with paragraph (d) of Housing policy 11.

6.2.12 Paragraph (e), questions whether the use would be compatible with adjoining established uses. The closest neighbouring residential property would be the applicants dwelling The Grange and the proposed barn conversion to a single residential dwelling to the north of the application site, again within the applicant's ownership. The proposal would increase the level of disturbance (comings and goings); however, it is not considered the proposal would result in any significant adverse impacts upon neighbouring amenities (loss of light, overbearing impact upon outlooks and/or overlooking) to warrant a refusal.

6.2.14 Finally, Housing Policy 11 requires that the building is or can be provided with satisfactory services without unreasonable public expenditure. The site is adjacent to existing residential properties which all the necessary services. It is considered that it is not unreasonable to consider that the applicants will be able to connect to existing services for this site; albeit at the applicant's cost. Therefore the proposal complies with this aspect of Housing Policy 11.

6.2.15 It is noted that the site is nearby to The Clypse Reservoir approximately 300m (measured from eastern elevations of barn) and within an area designated as "Unsuitable for development, danger of pollution to water supply". However, there is no evidence submitted to demonstrate there would be any significant impacts by the proposed development, which is changing the use of former agricultural building to a single domestic property. Arguable, the dwelling would have less potential impact than any farming (keeping of animals) operation.

6.3 Potential impacts upon the countryside/landscape (EP1); 6.3.1 Given the sites position within the countryside and designation, the development proposed needs to ensure it would not adversely affect the countryside.

6.3.2 It is likely the majority proposed works will not be publically apparent given the position of the works and distance from public viewpoints and mature landscaping between. Furthermore, the proposed alterations are considered of a high quality and design and would fit well with the barns, the site and the countryside setting.

==== PAGE 11 ====

                                                 25/90528/B                                      Page  11  of  12

6.3.3 Overall, it is considered the proposed works would not adversely affect the countryside or harm the character and quality of the landscape and therefore comply with EP 1.

6.4 Access arrangements/parking (GP2 & TP 4 & 7) 6.4.1 As outlined the occupants of the dwelling would largely utilise the existing driveway and access onto the Clypse Moar Road. Highway Services have confirmed this and raise no objection.

6.4.2 More than two off road parking spaces per unit can be provided within the site and turning provision. This would comply with the IOMSP.

6.4.3 Overall, it is considered the traffic generated by the proposed units can be accommodated within the existing highway network, without having any significant adverse impact upon highway safety for all road users and provides sufficient off road parking spaces to serve the dwelling. 6.5 Impacts upon Ecology / Trees (EP 3, 4 & 5) 6.5.1 The application includes bat report prepared by Manx Bat Group and bird survey prepared by Manx Birdlife.

6.5.2 Following the surveys and recommendations, it is proposed to provide two swallow boxes, two swift boxes, two House sparrow nest boxes and two bat boxes, to various positions and elevations of the barns (shown on elevational drawing and conditioned).

6.5.3 The comments made by the Ecosystem Policy Officer are noted and the conditions suggested are proposed should the application be approved.

6.5.4 In relation to impacts upon trees, the submission does not propose to remove any trees with the site.

7.0 CONCLUSION 7.1 Overall, it is considered the proposed works would not adversely affect the countryside, have no adverse impact upon any protected species/trees; and have no significant impacts upon private or public amenities and therefore comply with HP 11 and EP 1, 4 & 5, TP 4 & 7 and GP2 of the IOM Strategic Plan 2016.

7.2 Accordingly, the application is recommended for an approval.

8.0 RIGHT TO APPEAL AND RIGHT TO GIVE EVIDENCE

8.1 The Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 sets out the process for determining planning applications (including appeals). It sets out a Right to Appeal (i.e. to submit an appeal against a planning decision) and a Right to Give Evidence at Appeals (i.e. to participate in an appeal if one is submitted).

8.2 Article A10 sets out that the right to appeal is available to: o applicant (in all cases); o a Local Authority; Government Department; Manx Utilities; and Manx National Heritage that submit a relevant objection; and o any other person who has made an objection that meets specified criteria.

8.3 Article 8(2)(a) requires that in determining an application, the Department must decide who has a right to appeal, in accordance with the criteria set out in article A10.

8.4 The Order automatically affords the Right to Give Evidence to the following (no determination is required): o any appellant or potential appellant (which includes the applicant);

==== PAGE 12 ====

                                                 25/90528/B                                      Page  12  of  12

o the Department of Environment, Food and Agriculture, the Department of Infrastructure and the local authority for the area; o any other person who has submitted written representations (this can include other Government Departments and Local Authorities); and o in the case of a petition, a single representative.

8.5 The Department of Environment Food and Agriculture is responsible for the determination of planning applications. As a result, where officers within the Department make comments in a professional capacity they cannot be given the Right to Appeal.

__

I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded interested person status and/or rights to appeal.

Decision Made : Permitted

Date: 01.10.2025

Determining Officer

Signed : J SINGLETON

Jason Singleton

Principal Planner

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the office copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online service/customers and archive record.