17 September 2024 · Delegated - Principal Planner (Jason Singleton)
Field 320909, Top Road, Crosby, Isle Of Man, IM4 4hn
The proposal involved building a 48m² footprint (70m² internal) A-frame hobby cabin, 5.6m ridge height, with hobby room, washroom, wellbeing room, veranda, and balcony on a small field used for horticulture. It featured sustainable elements like solar PV panels, rainwater harvesting, and timber/shingle construction.
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer determined the hobby cabin's size (48m² footprint, nearly 70m² internal floor area), scale, 5.6m height, and two-storey layout with washroom and wellbeing room were excessive for a leisure…
Spatial Policy 5
Limits new development to defined settlements, allowing countryside only per General Policy 3. Proposal failed as non-essential horticultural leisure facility on smallholding.
General Policy 3
Permits countryside development only for essential agriculture/forestry, overriding national need, or interpretation buildings. Officer ruled hobby cabin did not qualify under (f), (g), or (h), lacking essential horticultural need.
General Policy 2
Requires developments to respect site/surroundings in siting, scale, form, design (b) and not adversely affect landscape character (c). Inaccurate siting next to mis-positioned storage made it cramped and incongruous.
Environment Policy 1
Protects countryside/ecology unless overriding national need with no alternative. No such need demonstrated; proposal adversely affected countryside character.
Environment Policy 15
Permits new agricultural/horticultural buildings (including dwellings) if need outweighs countryside policy, sited near groups, appropriate scale/form. Failed due to no proven need, excessive residential scale, and poor siting.
Housing Policy 7
New agricultural dwellings only in exceptional circumstances with real need. Cited as cabin tantamount to dwelling without viability on 0.46ha site.
Do not oppose
Highway Services HDC does not oppose the application due to no significant negative highway impacts, while Marown Parish Commissioners object citing overdevelopment of the countryside.
Key concern: overdevelopment of the countryside
Highway Services HDC
No ObjectionAfter reviewing this Application, Highway Services HDC finds it to have no significant negative impact upon highway safety, network functionality and/or parking as the existing access is acceptable for the relatively minor intensification of the land.; Highway Services HDC does not oppose (DNO) the following applications.
Marown Parish Commissioners
ObjectionThe Commissioners resolved to OBJECT to the application on the following grounds:; The size of the proposed structure is substantial and detrimental to the surroundings; The structure would constitute overdevelopment of the countryside; There is a presumption against development in the countryside