187222

==== PAGE 1 ====

                                      20/00528/MCH                                     Page  1  of  3

PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Application No. : 20/00528/MCH Applicant : Haven Homes Limited Proposal : Minor changes application for PA 19/00636/B involving installation of a heat pump with fencing and roof solar panels to plot 59 Site Address : Plots 59 Grove Park Clifton Drive

Head of Development Management: Mr S Butler

Recommendation

Recommended Decision:

Permitted Date of Recommendation: 16.07.2020 __

Notes for Approval

Approval is given to all the applied for changes.

Plans/Drawings/Information;

This decision relates to the application form, Ecodan air source heat pump specification, JA Solar specification, cover letter and plans 040(e), 002(N) and 000(C) all date stamped as having been received 03/06/20

__

Officer’s Report

Requirement Source Analysis Pass Basis of Application Only one minor changes application may be made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval. 21(1) No previous MCH Yes Must relate to a grant of planning approval in respect of a building 21/2)(a) Approval for construction of 3 houses Yes Must specify what minor changes are being sought and why the applicant considers them to be of a minor nature 21(2)(b) Set out on application form - heat pump, solar panels, amendment to fence Yes Cannot increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted 21(2)(c)(i) No change Yes Cannot increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been 21(2)(c)(ii) The solar panels and fence amendment are acceptable. The installation of the heat pump is In part

==== PAGE 2 ====

                                      20/00528/MCH                                     Page  2  of  3

granted not attached to the house and so would not increase its footprint Cannot alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line 21(2)(c)(iii) No change Yes Cannot make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted 21(2)(c)(iv) No change (fence alteration has no impact) Yes Cannot alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed 21(2)(c)(v) No change Yes Cannot be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired 21(2)(d) No concerns Yes Requirement Source Analysis Pass Application Content Application Form 22(3)(a) Provided Yes Information in Schedule 1: · Site location plan (including flood risk assessment) · The planning approval that is the subject of the application · The changes to that approval which are being applied for · An explanation as to why those changes are being applied for; · (if relevant) the site plan, and the plans, elevations and sections of the proposed buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes. 22(3)(a&c) Provided Yes Document specified on form but not in Schedule 1 22(3)(b) N/A Yes Fee 22(3)(4) Provided Yes Such further info as Department may request prior to determination 22(6) N/A Yes Requirement Source Analysis Pass Determination Must not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question 23(1)(a) No concerns - approval is for 3 houses Yes Must not significantly change the nature of the development in question 23(1)(b) No concerns Yes Requirement Source Analysis Pass Must not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so 23(1)(c) No concerns. Potential issues are visual impact and amenity - the fence and solar panel amendment do not raise concerns. Heat Pump may create noise concerns, but given distance to nearest house (And separated by POS) no concerns. Yes

==== PAGE 3 ====

                                      20/00528/MCH                                     Page  3  of  3

Provision of on-site RE overall results in better compliance with Strategic Plan, in relation to RE development. Noted existing and proposed provisions of PDO. Must not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations) 23(1)(d) See above Yes Must not be more than minor and to be of a magnitude to warrant a new application 23(1)(e) No concerns in relation to this specially Yes Must not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made. 23(1)(e) No concerns Yes If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable? 23(2) Overall amendments will result in a more sustainable dwelling Yes Notice of Decision Set out whether all, some or no changes are accepted (And which is which) 24(2)(a) All

For any elements refused, the reasons for that. 24(2)(b) N/A

__

I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Director of Planning and Building Control in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.

Decision Made : Permitted Date : 17/7/20

Determining officer Signed : J CHANCE

Jennifer Chance

Director of Planning and Building Control

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the assessment and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.