Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
20/00156/MCH Page 1 of 5
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 20/00156/MCH Applicant : Mrs Rosemary Glassey Proposal : Minor changes application for PA 19/00815/B involving window / door alteration and blocking up of front elevation garage door Site Address : Ballasalla Airport Garage Douglas Road Ballasalla Isle Of Man IM9 2AN
Planning Officer: Miss Lucy Kinrade
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 03.09.2020 __
Notes for Approval
Approval is hereby given for all of the changes proposed.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This approval relates to the following drawings all date stamped and received 20/08/2020: Sheet 1 - Existing Sheet 2 - Proposed Sheet3 - Existing and Proposed Garage DWG 1 - visual DWG 2 - visual DWG 3 - visual __
Officer’s Report
Requirement Source Analysis Pass Basis of Application Only one minor changes application may be made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval. 21(1) There have been no other minor changes in relation to 19/00815/B
YES Must relate to a grant of planning approval in respect of a building 21/2)(a) 19/00815/B was approved for the installation of cladding to entrance façade, removal of an attached single garage to the side to improve vehicular access into rear and provide additional parking and installation of industrial equipment to rear elevation. YES
==== PAGE 2 ====
20/00156/MCH Page 2 of 5
Must specify what minor changes are being sought and why the applicant considers them to be of a minor nature 21(2)(b) Proposal seeks to; • block up the existing front elevation garage door • replace the front elevation door and window entrance with a window only, • clad front elevation in Pooil Vaaish Black Limestone • replace one of the existing side elevation windows with a new entrance door. • Replacement of a rear windows into a garage door to providing access into the garage space.
Changes will encourage customers to use a side entrance away from the ‘Spar’ forecourt to improve the safety of pedestrians and relocation of the garage door will reduce potential for vehicles to park blocking its access.
YES Cannot increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted 21(2)(c)(i) No change
YES Cannot increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted 21(2)(c)(ii) No change
YES Cannot alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line 21(2)(c)(iii) No change
YES Cannot make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted 21(2)(c)(iv) No changes proposed to vehicular access off main road
YES Cannot alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed 21(2)(c)(v) The original application was approved with the standard 4 year condition and three others relating to the need for noise levels of equipment being provided prior to their operation (C2), that the retractable bollards shown in the submission must be installed prior to coming into operation of the use (C3), YES
==== PAGE 3 ====
20/00156/MCH Page 3 of 5
and that the stone processing operations shall only take place in the area annotated ‘warehouse’ along with any external equipment approved through condition 2, and that no approval is granted to any change of use to the remaining buildings on the site (the fuel filling station and associated shop and offices) shown on the submitted plans (C4).
The current application proposes physical changes to the external elevations only and does not affect the conditions.
Cannot be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired 21(2)(d) 19/00815/B was approved on 5th September 2019 YES Requirement Source Analysis Pass Application Content Application Form 22(3)(a) Provided
YES Information in Schedule 1: • Site location plan (including flood risk assessment) • The planning approval that is the subject of the application • The changes to that approval which are being applied for • An explanation as to why those changes are being applied for; • (if relevant) the site plan, and the plans, elevations and sections of the proposed buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes. 22(3)(a&c) Site and location plan provided Not in flood risk area Has reference parent approval 19/00815/B Has set out changes in supporting statement Has provided relevant plans and elevations Has provided visual illustrations (not to scale)
Document specified on form but not in Schedule 1 22(3)(b) Proposed illustrative visuals provided
YES Fee 22(3)(4) Dealt with at validation
YES Such further info as Department may request prior to determination 22(6) It is not considered that any further information is required
YES Requirement Source Analysis Pass Determination Must not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question 23(1)(a) The proposal does not result in any changes to the footprint size or scale of the development. YES Must not significantly change the nature of the development in question 23(1)(b) 19/00815/B was approved for the demolition of a garage, YES
==== PAGE 4 ====
20/00156/MCH Page 4 of 5
installation of front elevation cladding, installation of bollards and the external siting of equipment. The current proposal now seeks additional changes to the external elevations, it could be argued that this increases the nature of the application, however when viewed in context with the overall approval it is not considered to significantly change the nature of development. Requirement Source Analysis Pass Must not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so 23(1)(c) External finishes can impact on whether or not a proposal is visually acceptable, in this case 19/00815/B was considered against General Policy 2 and the cladding likely to improve the overall appearance and welcomed, and the removal of the side garage not to result in any adverse visual impacts. In this case the removal of the front garage door and its re- cladding over and the alteration of the front entrance door to a window are both considered to be visually acceptable in respect of GP2. The installation of a garage door towards the rear and the replacement of a side elevation window with a new entrance door are also considered to be visually acceptable On this basis of visual acceptability the proposal still complies with General Policy 2. YES Must not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations) 23(1)(d) It is not considered that there are any new or increased adverse impacts and there are no significant impacts on the environment. YES Must not be more than minor and to be of a magnitude to warrant a new application 23(1)(e) It is considered acceptable in this regard
YES Must not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made. 23(1)(e) It is considered acceptable in this regard
YES If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable? 23(2) Analysis has been given as to the acceptability of the proposals in relation to General Policy 2 YES
==== PAGE 5 ====
20/00156/MCH Page 5 of 5
and is considered acceptable.
Notice of Decision Set out whether all, some or no changes are accepted (And which is which) 24(2)(a) All proposed changes recommended for approval
For any elements refused, the reasons for that. 24(2)(b) N/A
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Permitted Date : 4/9/20
Determining officer Signed : S BUTLER
Stephen Butler
Head of Development Management
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the assessment and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal