Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
19/00186/B Page 1 of 6
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 19/00186/B Applicant : IOM Government Department of Infrastructure Proposal : Erection of temporary marquee for storage of tramcars with extension of existing tram tracks into associated structure Site Address : Part Of Summerland Site King Edward Road Douglas Isle of Man
Principal Planner: Mr Chris Balmer Photo Taken : 13.03.2019 Site Visit : 13.03.2019 Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 01.04.2019 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The building and use hereby approved shall be discontinued and the land restored to its former condition (including removal of all buildings/structures) before the 1st April 2020.
Reason: The development has only been found to be acceptable on a short term basis because it meets a specific need.
Plans/Drawings/Information:
This approval relates to the submitted documents and drawings reference numbers 01, 02, 03 and 04 all received on 21st February 2019.
__
Interested Person Status - Additional Persons
It is recommended that the following persons should not be given Interested Person Status as they are not considered to have sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application to take part in any subsequent proceedings and are not mentioned in Article 6(4):
Highcroft, Ballavitchel Road, Crosby - as they do not clearly identify the land which is owned or occupied which is considered to be impacted on by the proposed development in accordance with paragraph 2A of the Policy; are not within 20m of the application site and the development is not automatically required to be the subject of an EIA by Appendix 5 of the Strategic Plan, in accordance with paragraph 2B of the Policy; as they do not refer to the relevant issues in accordance with paragraph 2C of the Policy and as they have not explained how the development would impact the lawful use of land owned or occupied by them and in
==== PAGE 2 ====
19/00186/B Page 2 of 6
relation to the relevant issues identified in paragraph 2C of the Policy, as is required by paragraph 2D of the Policy. __
Officer’s Report
1.0 THE SITE 1.1 The application site is part of the curtilage of part of the Summerland Site, King Edward Road, Douglas which is situated on the northern side of the King Edward Road and on the opposite side of the road with the end of the Promenade Walkway. To the east of the site is the Manx Electric Railway Depot and to the northwest is the Terminus Tavern and the former Strathallan Horse Tram Depot which has recently been demolished.
1.2 The site, since the demolition of the Aquadrome and Summerland building, has been mainly unused, the exception being that it was utilised to park vehicles associated with the 'TT Fair'.
1.3 The site character is flat with a one metre high timber fence running along the southern boundary, parallel with the MER lines. A 2 metre high chain link fence to the northern boundary also exists. This fence demarks the flat part of the site with the bottom of the cliff face which runs up to the rear boundaries of the properties along Strathallan Road.
1.4 The main access to the site is via Strathallan Crescent which runs from King Edward Road past the Terminus Tavern where an existing gate provides access to the site.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 The application seeks full approval for the erection of temporary marquee for storage of tramcars with extension of existing tram tracks into associated structure.
2.2 The temporary marquee is proposed to accommodate the existing tramcars which would normally have been accommodated within the former Strathallan Horse Tram Depot. Planning approval for a replacement Horse Tram Depot building has been granted and these works are expect to commence and finished in March 2020. No horses are proposed to be stabled in the temporary marquee building.
2.3 The proposed temporary marquee would have a width of 20.4m, a depth of 10.1m and a ridge height of 7.4m.
3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 The following previous planning applications are considered to be specifically material in the assessment of the current application:
3.2 Creation of temporary parking and vehicular access with associated lighting - 19/00119/B - APPROVED (immediately to east of application site).
3.3 Creation of a temporary works compound to be used for the Douglas Promenade Refurbishment - 18/01272/B - APPROVED (immediately to north of application site).
3.4 Erection of temporary facility to provide stabling for tram horses, comprising a stable building, hay store, staff and welfare facilities and parking for a period of 5 years - 17/01067/B
3.5 Variation of condition 3 of PA12/01359/B to extend Derby Castle MER Depot, to extend the period of approval for a further 5 years - 17/00787/B - APPROVED
==== PAGE 3 ====
19/00186/B Page 3 of 6
3.6 Erection of temporary horse tram facility including tram shed, stables, staff welfare facilities, parking and new vehicular access - 16/01365/B - APPROVED on a temporary five year period.
3.7 Extension to Derby Castle MER Depot to provide parking and operational facilities - 12/01359/B - APPROVED (east of application site).
3.8 Demolition of existing swimming pool building and leisure complex - 03/01998/B - APPROVED
4.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN POLICIES 4.1 The application site is located within an area that is designated by the Douglas Local Plan as being Tourism and is immediately adjacent to land that is designated as being Railway Purposes. Given the nature of the application it is appropriate to consider the following planning policies:
4.2 Strategic Policy 4 states: "Proposals for development must: (a) Protect or enhance the fabric and setting of Ancient Monuments, Registered Buildings, Conservation Areas, buildings and structures within National Heritage Areas, and sites of archaeological interest; (b) protect or enhance the landscape quality and nature conservation value of urban as well as rural areas but especially in respect to development adjacent to Areas of Special Scientific Interest and other designations; and (c) not cause or lead unacceptable environmental pollution or disturbance."
4.3 General Policy 2 states: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development: (a) is in accordance with the design brief in the Area Plan where there is such a brief; (b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (d) does not adversely affect the protected wildlife or locally important habitats on the site or adjacent land, including water courses; (e) does not affect adversely public views of the sea; (f) incorporates where possible existing topography and landscape features, particularly trees and sod banks; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (j) can be provided with all necessary services; (k) does not prejudice the use or development of adjoining land in accordance with the appropriate Area Plan; (l) is not on contaminated land or subject to unreasonable risk of erosion or flooding; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them; and (n) is designed having due regard to best practice in reducing energy consumption."
4.4 Environment Policy 35 states: "Within Conservation Areas, the Department will permit only development which would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development."
==== PAGE 4 ====
19/00186/B Page 4 of 6
4.5 Transport Policy 3 states: "New development on or around existing and former rail routes should not compromise their attraction as a tourism and leisure facility or their potential as public transport routes, or cycle / leisure footpath routes."
4.6 Transport Policy 4 states: "The new and existing highways which serve any new development must be designed so as to be capable of accommodating the vehicle and pedestrian journeys generated by that development in a safe and appropriate manner, and in accordance with the environmental objectives of this plan."
4.7 Environment Policy 22 states: "Development will not be permitted where it would unacceptably harm the environment and/or the amenity of nearby properties in terms of: i) pollution of sea, surface water or groundwater; ii) emissions of airborne pollutants; and iii) vibration, odour, noise or light pollution."
4.8 Conservation Areas of Planning Policy Statement 1/01 (Policy and Guidance Notes for the Conservation of the Historic Environment of the Isle of Man) - Policy CA/2 - Special Planning Considerations states: "When considering proposals for the possible development of any land or buildings which fall within the conservation area, the impact of such proposals upon the special character of the area, will be a material consideration when assessing the application.
Where a development is proposed for land which, although not within the boundaries of the conservation area, would affect its context or setting, or views into or out of the area; such issues should be given special consideration where the character or appearance of a conservation area may be affected."
OTHER MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS 4.9 Within the recently published Draft Area Plan for the East the site is designated as "Mixed Use".
4.10 The Manual for Manx Roads (published by the Department of Infrastructure) sets out detailed guidance on highways matters.
5.0 CONSULTATIONS 5.1 Douglas Borough Council have no objection (18.03.2019).
5.2 The owner/occupier of Highcroft, Ballavitchel Road, Crosby objects to the application which can be summarised as (14.03.2019): not compatible with existing adjacent uses; horse attract horse flies which are deterred when a horse is taken into a dark building; the marquee will not deter them; it is close to location where persons buy tickets and wait for the trams; and health issues relating to biting of horse flies.
6.0 ASSESSMENT 6.1 The main issues to consider in the assessment of the application are whether the proposed use on this site is acceptable and potential impacts upon the street scene and Conservation Area.
PRINCIPLE OF THE PROPOSED USE ON THIS SITE 6.2 The proposed use is tourist related use, albeit not exclusively for tourist usage as person travelling to work for example could use the trams; however, the main use is tourist related.
6.3 The use of brownfield sites for temporary uses raises various questions - the extent that the use of the site as a temporary car park discourages investment in its more permanent development, the likely condition of the site in the interim if approval is not given for a temporary use and the extent to which the latter outweighs the former.
==== PAGE 5 ====
19/00186/B Page 5 of 6
6.4 In this case it is noted the site to the north and east of the application site and forms part of the former Summerland site, have both recently been granted permission for temporary works compound to be used for the Douglas Promenade Refurbishment (18/01272/B) and creation of temporary parking and vehicular access with associated lighting (19/00119/B). These included a condition which was for a "limited period of 2 years (104 weeks) from the date of this approval in relation to application 18/01272/B and 1st November 2020 for application 19/00119/B. Accordingly, a large section of the former Summerland site is already being used for temporary purposes. Further the proposed application again is in associated with the construction of the new Strathallan Horse Tram Depot building which is understood to be completed by March 2020. Finally, it is noted that the Draft Eastern Area Plan is still under consideration with the Public Enquiry later this year, which will then follow further consideration of the Inspectors comments, further re-drafting and then finally a decision by Tynwald. Accordingly, it is likely a decision on the Draft Plan would be towards the end of the year/beginning of next year. Accordingly, it is likely during this period, the site will not become developed given the land use of the site has not been determined. Further a planning application would need to be made, a scheme designed and the site would need to be purchased by the new developer (owned by IOM Gov) which would take a number of months.
6.5 Overall, it is considered given the position of the Draft Area Plan and a likely date for a final decision is a number of months away (possibly next year) and given the use would be for a fairly limited period to meet the need of storage of horse tram cars and enable the horse tramway operating this year, the principle of the development would be acceptable and would not discourage more permanent development.
POTENTIAL IMPACT UPON THE STREET SCENE AND CONSERVATION AREA 6.6 The Planning Department has a duty to determine whether such proposals are in keeping with not only the individual building, but the special character and quality of the area as a whole. With this in mind it is very relevant to consider Environment Policy 35 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan (adopted June 2016). This policy indicates that development within Conservation Areas will only be permitted if they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Area, and will ensure that the special features contributing to the character and quality are protected against inappropriate development.
6.7 The proposed use and overall appearance would not be attractive and would in fact be detrimental to the visual appearance of the area, similar to how the existing site appears. Accordingly, if it was proposed that the proposal was a permanent use, then the Department would have serious concerns as it would not preserve or enhance the Conservation Area, as required to do so.
6.8 However, given the temporary period the planning application seeks (March 2020), it is perhaps a more pragmatic approach to take in the short term to allow for the temporary usage for the reason indicated previously in this report, to meet the short term need while the new Strathallan Horse Tram Depot building is completed.
7.0 CONCLUSION 7.1 For the reasons outlined above it is considered that the planning application is acceptable, subject to conditions limiting the time of usage of the site, and it is therefore recommended that the planning application be approved.
8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013 (Article 6(4), the following persons are automatically interested persons: (a) The applicant, or if there is one, the applicant's agent; (b) The owner and the occupier of any land that is the subject of the application or any other person in whose interest the land becomes vested;
==== PAGE 6 ====
19/00186/B Page 6 of 6
(c) Any Government Department that has made written submissions relating to planning considerations with respect to the application that the Department considers material (d) Highway Services Division of Department of Infrastructure and (e) The local authority in whose district the land the subject of the application is situated.
8.2 The Planning Committee must determine: o whether any other comments from Government Departments (other than the Department of Infrastructure Highway Services Division) are material; and o whether there are other persons to those listed in Article 6(4) who should be given Interested Person Status. __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Permitted
Date : 04.04.2019
Determining officer
Signed : S BUTLER
Stephen Butler
Head of Development Management
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal