29 August 2019 · Delegated - Principal Planner (Chris Balmer)
6, Snaefell Crescent, Onchan, Isle Of Man, IM3 4nj
The proposal involves adding a single storey extension to the northeast elevation projecting 2.6m from the rear of the attached garage (3.1m wide, 2.3m high) to create an ensuite, a rear extension (3.9m wide, 2.4m deep, 2.3m high) to enlarge the rear bedroom, and a first floor dormer (south facing, set back 2.4m from e…
Click a button above to find applications similar to this one.
See how this application compares to similar ones — policies, conditions, and outcomes side by side.
The officer assessed the proposal against General Policy 2 of the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016, which requires development to respect the site and surroundings in terms of siting, layout, scale, fo…
General Policy 2
Requires development in residential zoning to respect site and surroundings in siting, layout, scale, form, design; not adversely affect character, amenity of residents, or prejudice adjoining land. Officer found proposal compliant as extensions blend with existing dwelling, are subordinate, minimally visible publicly, and cause no amenity harm. Design elements like window materials, proportions, roof pitch considered per Residential Design Guide.
Residential Design Guide 2019 Section 3.1
Emphasises relationship to original building (materials, design, detailing), adjoining properties (building line, roof line), and roof pitch/shape. Officer assessed holistically, noting well-judged design integrates successfully, enhancing sustainability without jarring forms.
Section 4.4 Extension to Side Elevation (RDG 2019)
Requires side extensions to be subordinate, with pitched roof matching original, ridge lower than main dwelling, proportionate height/width. Officer noted dormer roof extension fails ridge height test (not lower than main), but justified approval as lowering would reduce utility/safety, with minimal public visibility.
Time limit
The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with article 14 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No2) Order 2013 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
no highways interest
recommended that the application be APPROVED for planning purposes only
Highways Division reported no highways interest, while Onchan District Commissioners recommended approval.
Department of Infrastructure (DOI) Highways Division
No ObjectionNo Highways Interest; NHI on 26 July 19
Onchan District Commissioners
SupportThe Commissioners would recommend that the application be APPROVED for planning purposes only.