Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
18/00199/LAW Page 1 of 2
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 18/00199/LAW Applicant : Nicholas William Harger Mitchell Proposal : Application for certificate of Lawful Development for installation of replacement windows Site Address : 24 Church Street Peel Isle Of Man IM5 1HL
Case Officer : Miss Lucy Kinrade Photo Taken :
Site Visit :
Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Certificate of Lawful Use/Devel Approved Date of Recommendation: 12.04.2018 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. Sufficient evidence has been supplied to issue a Certificate of Lawful Development confirming that no enforcement notice can or should be issued in respect of the installation of replacement windows on the front elevation of 24 Church Street, Peel.
Plans/Drawings/Information;
This Certificate of Lawful Development relates to the site plan, site photograph and google street view image Oct 2010 all date stamped and received 05/03/2018.
__
Interested Person Status - Additional Persons
NONE __
Officer’s Report
APPLICATION SITE 1.1 The application site is the residential curtilage of 24 Church Street, Peel, a three storey mid terrace dwelling situated on the western side of the main road and sitting at the southern end of the street.
1.2 Church Street is part of the Peel Conservation Area; it is also a well-used route through the town. The existing property fronts directly on to the road.
1.3 On the front elevation the property has a front access door and large window at ground level and two windows to each of the floors above.
==== PAGE 2 ====
18/00199/LAW Page 2 of 2
THE PROPOSAL AND EVIDENCE SUBMITTED 2.1 A Certificate of Lawful Development is sought for the installation of replacement windows to the front elevation of the property
2.2 The application has been submitted with the following evidence (in no order):
PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 A contemporaneous application has been submitted for the site for the retrospective roofing works carried out to the dwelling and workshop. This application is yet to be determined under PA 18/00124/B.
REPRESENTATIONS 4.1 Peel Town Commissioners have no objection (06/04/18).
ASSESSMENT 5.1 This is an application seeking a Certificate of Lawful Development, and therefore it is not a matter of considering the planning merits of the scheme but rather a legal determination based on the facts to establish whether the stated operations are established and lawful by period of time and therefore beyond the scope of enforcement action. The test of the evidence is based on the balance of reasonableness. In this instance, the applicant seeks to rely on the fact that the windows in question have been in situ for a minimum of 4 years to establish that the development can be considered lawful, as set out in Part 4, Section 24(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1999.
5.2 The applicant has provided a current photograph of the windows within the front elevation, they have also sought to submit photographic evidence of the windows as viewed on Google street view captured in October 2010. Following a desktop study of Google street view the image is considered to be accurate and correct. The information submitted for the application provides clear and justified evidence that the existing windows have been installed and in situ for a period longer than 4 years.
CONCLUSION 6.1 In view of the above, it is recommended that a Certificate of Lawful Development be issued to confirm that no enforcement notice can or should be issued in respect of the operations. __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Senior Planning Officer in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation.
Decision Made : Certificate of Lawful Use/Devel Approved
Date: 13.04.2018
Determining officer
Signed : S CORLETT Sarah Corlett
Senior Planning Officer
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal