163953

==== PAGE 1 ====

                                      22/00123/MCH                                     Page  1  of  4

PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Application No. : 22/00123/MCH Applicant : Mr & Mrs Greenhalgh Proposal : Minor Change application to PA 21/00203/B involving reduction of footprint, amendments to roof and utilising roof space, alterations of windows and driveway alignment Site Address : The Warren Clannagh Road Santon Isle Of Man IM4 2HP

Planning Officer: Mrs Vanessa Porter Photo Taken :

Site Visit : Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation

Recommendation

Recommended Decision:

Refused Date of Recommendation: 23.02.2022 __

Reasons for Refusal

R : Reasons for Refusal O : Notes attached to reasons

R 1. The change in siting, mass, design and form are changes which go beyond minor and which would require full assessment as part of a new application. __

Interested Person Status - Additional Persons

None __

Officer’s Report

INTRODUCTION The following application is to be assessed against the criteria set out in Part 3 - Minor Changes Applications of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 specifically Articles 21, 22, 23 and 24.

BASIS OF APPLICATION 21(1) This is the only minor changes application that has been made in respect of any particular grant of planning approval.

PASS - relates to 21/00203/B and no other MCH application shave been received for this application.

21(2)(a) The Minor Change Application relates to the grant of planning approval in respect of a building

PASS - relates to erection of a replacement dwelling

==== PAGE 2 ====

                                      22/00123/MCH                                     Page  2  of  4

21(2)(b) The application specifies what minor changes are being sought

PASS - the application form specifies that the application proposes: Reduction of Footprint, Amendments to roof and utilising roof space, Alterations of windows and driveway alignment

21(2)(b) The application specifies why the applicant considers the minor changes to be of a minor nature

PASS - the statement of case states, "However, following the applicants own review of the design, for construction purposes, and further discussions with the neighbours, the following changes are proposed and considered minor amendment for the following reasons: o The site has planning consent and 21 days have elapsed with no appeal requested. o The development has not been completed and the planning approval has not lapsed. o This is the first application for minor amendments. o We are not adding additional dwellings, increasing net footprint of approved building, altering the site boundary, altering approved access or changing special conditions applied to approval."

21(2)(c)(i) The Minor Change Application does not increase the number of dwellings or buildings for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no increase

21(2)(c)(ii)The Minor Change Application does not increase the net external footprint of a building for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no increase in floor area

21(2)(c)(iii) The Minor Change Application does not alter the site for which planning approval has been granted and which was defined by a red line on the site location map by changing that line

PASS - no change to site

21(2)(c)(iv) The Minor Change Application does not make material changes to the vehicular access arrangements for which planning approval has been granted

PASS - no change to access

21(2)(c)(v) The Minor Change Application does not alter the conditions (if any) which have been imposed

PASS - no change

21(2)(d)The Minor Change Application is not be made where the parent approval is less than 21 days old, subject to an undetermined appeal or has expired

PASS - original application approved on 23.014.2021

APPLICATION CONTENT 22(3)(a) Application Form

PASS - provided

22(3)(a&c) The information in Schedule 1 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 has been provided:

o Site location plan (with red/blue lines) o The planning approval that is the subject of the application o Explanation of changes being applied for and reasons why o drawings of the proposed minor changes with buildings and structures amended to indicate the changes o Flood risk assessment is not necessary in this case

==== PAGE 3 ====

                                      22/00123/MCH                                     Page  3  of  4

- PASS - provided

22(3)(b) Provision of other documents specified on form but not in Schedule 1

PASS - N/A

22(3)(4) Fee

PASS - Dealt with at submission

22(6) Such further info as Department may request prior to determination (has anything further been requested and provided?)

PASS - N/A

DETERMINATION 23(1)(a) The Minor Change does not significantly increase the size or scale of the development in question

FAIL - Whilst there is a reduction is the external footprint, the massing of the proposal has changed and needs to be reassessed.

23(1)(b) The Minor Change does not significantly change the nature of the development in question

FAIL - the proposal has changed in mass, design and form.

23(1)(c) The Minor Change does not result in an approval which, at the time of approval, complied with a Development Plan, National Policy Directive or a Planning Policy Statement, ceasing to do so

FAIL - the proposal has alterations which would need to be reassessed under General Policy 2.

23(1)(d) The Minor Change does not result in new or increased adverse impacts on adjoining or neighbouring properties having a significant or disproportionate impact on the environment (irrespective of whether such impacts might be outweighed by other considerations)

FAIL - the new siting and increase in the 1st floor would need to be re-assessed in terms of its impact

23(1)(e) The Minor Change is not more than minor and is not of a magnitude to warrant a new application

FAIL - not considered minor and requires new application.

23(1)(e)The Minor Change does not otherwise fundamentally change the basis on which the grant was originally made.

FAIL - the application changes the siting, mass, design and form of what was previously approved

23(2) If it does not do any of the above, must then be considered. - is the application considered acceptable?

FAIL - not acceptable.

NOTICE OF DECISION 24(2)(a) Set out whether all or some of the changes are accepted

N/A

24(2)(b) Set out whether any elements are refused, the reasons for that.

All changes are refused due to the change in siting, mass, design and form which are beyond minor requiring full assessment as part of a new application. __

==== PAGE 4 ====

                                      22/00123/MCH                                     Page  4  of  4

I can confirm that this decision has been made by the Head of Development Management in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status

Decision Made : Refused Date : 23.02.2022

Determining officer Signed : S BUTLER

Stephen Butler

Head of Development Management

Customer note

This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.