Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
16/01325/C
Page 1 of 14
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 16/01325/C Applicant : Peel Golf Club Proposal : Change of use of part of practice ground as campsite for 2017 TT and Festival of Motoring periods. Site Address : Field 314539 Rheast Lane Peel Isle Of Man
Case Officer : Mr Edmond Riley Photo Taken : 22.02.2017 Site Visit : 22.02.2017 Expected Decision Level : Planning Committee
Officer’s Report
THE APPLICATION IS BROUGHT BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMITTEE OWING TO THE NATURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED.
1.0 THE APPLICATION SITE
1.1 The application site is an irregularly shaped parcel of land that comprises land to the southwest of the fairway to the first hole of Peel Golf Club, along with the club's practice putting green and car park to the north, at which point the site connects with Rheast Lane. The land comprises roughly half of the golf club's practice field, which is situated to the southwest of the clubhouse. This part of the site is accessed by crossing over the fairway, the access being shown as a narrow strip of land between the field and the aforementioned car park.
1.2 The application site is bounded by the golf course (to the east and southeast) and agricultural fields (west and southwest). Beyond these to both the east and north / northwest are situated residential dwellings: these are on Ballatessan Meadow to the north / northwest and Links Close cul-de-sac to the west of the practice putting green.
1.3 To its northwestern edge, the application site is a fairly consistent curve, whereas the remainder of the site is very varied in shape. The northwestern edge faces more or less parallel to the rear gardens of the dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow. The easternmost of the dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow is roughly 50m away at its nearest point and is the nearest dwelling to the edge of the application site.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL
2.1 The application seeks approval for the use of the agricultural field for camping during the 2017 TT and Grand Prix motorcycle events, plus five days either side of those periods for the setting up and dismantling of the tents. 75 tents 2.1m square are proposed in three lines fairly central within the site, while 25 bell tents 5m square are proposed to the southern, eastern and northern boundaries of the site and surrounding those lines of the smaller tents. The boundary to the northwest would be provided by Heras fencing. To the very north of the field are shown male and female WC cubicles.
2.2 At maximum occupancy, the camp site would contain 250 people.
==== PAGE 2 ====
16/01325/C
Page 2 of 14
2.3 The application has been submitted with a Planning Statement and traffic management plan, the latter showing where various signs would be located on the highway and the design / detail of those signs. The Statement explains the nature of the proposal and identifies the scale and kind of sanitary facilities that would be provided and also explains that the car park to be used in association with the proposal is an existing overspill car park. During the motorcycling events, the golf club tends to be less well-used and as such the agent foresees no conflict between the two uses taking place contemporaneously.
2.4 Access to the golf club is available only from Rheast Lane, which is an almost semi-circular highway that connects with both Tynwald Road (to the east) and Queens Drive (to the west). At the apex of the semi-circle there is another junction that turns south and connects into the golf club itself. Rheast Lane is narrow for much of its length to a degree that largely prevents the two-way movement of traffic. It is lined by both stone walling and trees / hedgerows for the majority of its length, and is particularly narrow along the northwestern 'spine' that connects up to Queens Drive. There are dwellings that sit all along Rheast Lane.
2.5 The application site as initially submitted allowed for no means of access. Accordingly, an amended plan showing a means of access was provided and circulated. Subsequently, and in view of the concerns raised by Highway Services (see paragraph 5.1 of this report, below), further amended plans were submitted showing alternative highways directional signage. These plans were also circulated.
2.6 Reference has also been made within the application to the cooking and cleaning facilities within the golf clubhouse being made available to the users of the proposed campsite, but as this is not within the red line of the application site the agent has confirmed that these facilities will not, in fact, be available to the users.
2.7 In respect of concern raised locally to the proposal (see paragraph 5.4.1 of this report, below), the agent was contacted with a view to clarifying the management / stewardship of the site should the application be approved. He responded as follows:
"...whilst actual numbers of stewards has yet to be finalised, I can advise that:-
o The campsite provider will have staff to set up the facility in advance of and dismantle post the event. o Stewards will be utilised to assist in the traffic management, site operations during the event, and the removal of the facility in conjunction with the facility provider. o The club / applicant is mindful of the potential for disruption particularly for the immediate neighbours and will be making every effort to ensure security and site cleanliness. It would not be in the clubs interest to allow the site to become noisy, cause disruption of become untidy / unsightly."
3.0 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
3.1 The site has not been the subject of any applications considered to be of material relevance to the determination of this current proposal. Moreover, there do not appear to have been any previous applications for temporary camp sites on the golf club.
3.2 Some members may recall similar proposals to this being approved at both the new Colby Football Club (PA 14/00036/C) and also successive applications at Ballakermeen School (the first being 13/00367/C).
4.0 THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4.1 The area within which the campsite would be located is actually zoned as Predominantly Residential (but outside of the Town Boundary) on the Peel Local Plan, which was adopted in 1989. The remainder of the application site is zoned as 'Golf Club'. Some of the land falling within that
==== PAGE 3 ====
16/01325/C
Page 3 of 14
Residential Zoning has been constructed (Ballatessan Meadow being the southernmost example), but there does not appear to be any immediate prospect of the remainder of that zoning being taken up for residential development. There are no written policies within the Peel Local Plan that specifically apply to this application, although it is worth noting the wording of paragraphs 4.12 and 4.13 therein:
"4.12 It is seen as essential that the integrity of the town be retained and that any tourist-related developments must be sympathetic to and compatible with the overall environment of Peel."
"4.13 A comprehensive scheme for the signposting of tourist attractions should be undertaken. This should be carried out in sympathy with the town's character and its status as a Conservation Area."
4.2 The Strategic Plan contains four policies considered relevant to the assessment of this current planning application.
4.3 General Policy 2 reads, in part: "Development which is in accordance with the land-use zoning and proposals in the appropriate Area Plan and with other policies of this Strategic Plan will normally be permitted, provided that the development:
(b) respects the site and surroundings in terms of the siting, layout, scale, form, design and landscaping of buildings and the spaces around them; (c) does not affect adversely the character of the surrounding landscape or townscape; (g) does not affect adversely the amenity of local residents or the character of the locality; (h) provides satisfactory amenity standards in itself, including where appropriate safe and convenient access for all highway users, together with adequate parking, servicing and manoeuvring space; (i) does not have an unacceptable effect on road safety or traffic flows on the local highways; (m) takes account of community and personal safety and security in the design of buildings and the spaces around them."
4.4 Business Policy 11 states: "Tourism development must be in accordance with the sustainable development objectives of this plan; policies and designations which seek to protect the countryside from development will be applied to tourist development with as much weight as they are to other types of development. Within the rural areas there may be situations where existing rural buildings would be used for tourist use and Environment Policy 16 sets out the circumstances where this may be permitted."
4.5 Transport Policy 4 states: "The new and existing highways which serve any new development must be designed so as to be capable of accommodating the vehicle and pedestrian journeys generated by that development in a safe and appropriate manner, and in accordance with the environmental objectives of this plan."
4.6 Environment Policy 22 states (in part): "Development will not be permitted where it would unacceptably harm the environment and/or the amenity of nearby properties in terms of:
(iii) vibration, odour, noise or light pollution."
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS
5.1.1 Highway Services of the Department of Infrastructure initially sought a deferral of the application pending receipt of amended plans, commenting as follows:
"The proposal is to use part of a golf club as a camp site during TT and MGP periods. The access to the golf club is via a narrow lane with substandard visibility onto Tynwald Road. It is proposed that vehicles will access the site from Tynwald Road and exit via Rheast Lane onto Queen's Drive; this will be an informal one way system initially, applying only to users of the camp site, however
==== PAGE 4 ====
16/01325/C
Page 4 of 14
Highway Services have the power to make to Rheast Lane one way for all traffic if it is felt to be necessary.
"Ellis Brown drawing nos 15/2584/05 and 15/2584/06 indicate inappropriate traffic signs on the highway; the applicant has been advised that these drawing should be amended."
5.1.2 Following receipt of the amended plans showing alternative positions and signage to direct the one-way traffic, Highway Services commented on 21st February 2017 as follows:
"Highway Services do not oppose this application subject to the following condition:
"During the operation of the campsite a traffic management scheme shall be in operation as indicated on Ellis Brown drawing numbers 15/2584/05-A and 15/2584/06-A
"Reason: in the interests of highway safety"
5.2 The Tourism team within the Department of Economic Development was contacted to seek their views on the proposal, but they confirmed that 'temporary' campsites such as these are not matters on which they generally offer comment.
5.3.1 Peel Town Commissioners objected to the application on 20.01.2017. They raised concern with respect to the width of the access land and the poor visibility from Rheast Lane onto Douglas Road [it is likely that they mean Tynwald Road, although the road is at this point sometimes called Douglas Road] that would support the additional traffic generated by the proposal, which would be at the peak traffic flow periods on the Island's roads.
5.3.2 Following receipt of the amended plans showing alternative positions and signage to direct the one-way traffic, the Commissioners raised concern regarding the width of the access lane, the lack of enforceability of the proposed advisory one way system and the poor visibility from Rheast Lane onto Douglas Road, all these concerns being with respect to the additional traffic generated by this development during peak traffic flow periods on the Island's roads.
5.4.1 A number of letters have been received from homeowners / occupiers in the area. The negative comments within those letters can be summarised as follows:
o No one has consulted us despite the application saying consultation with local people has occurred; o We will be directly affected by the development's traffic management plans, which will considerably disrupt our access to and from Mylvoirrey [the objector's home, on Rheast Lane]; o The lower section of Rheast Lane is very narrow and for this reason my wife and I never drive along it; o This part of the land is also much used by pedestrians, which is another reason we do not use it; o It is proposed that all traffic should have to use this part of Rheast Lane, which is madness; o If it is to be a voluntary one-way system and we drive in defiance of the No Entry signs then no doubt we shall be shouted out by persons coming the other way who will not appreciate its voluntary nature; o The development will cater for up to 250 persons and Rheast Lane simply cannot accommodate that level of traffic even if for only four weeks per year; o The existing overspill car park is actually the practice putting green, which begs the question as to whether or not a change of use application should have been submitted for that use, which it is in two or three times a week and is therefore not temporary; o The transport of the campsite equipment and sanitary facilities to the site will also have to be via Rheast lane and although bin wagons manage it less skilful drivers do not, as attested by damage done to my hedgerow;
==== PAGE 5 ====
16/01325/C
Page 5 of 14
o A warning sign I had installed has been knocked over numerous times by drivers, and has even been replaced by golf club ground staff but has still been hit any number of times since, and this has twice reported to the police; o It is not a practical proposition to bring larger vehicles down Rheast Lane; o This may be the thin end of the wedge and may be a precursor for other tourist development at the golf club, to which we are wholly opposed; o The campers will be able to use the gold club catering facilities, which is another change of use and also subject to licensing restrictions and fines, and it is not a public house so far as planning is concerned; o The existing car park will not provide sufficient parking as the majority of visitors to a campsite do not arrive by foot; o I fail to see how you can have a one-way system on a single track road; o The existing service vehicles cannot negotiate the junction without multiple manoeuvres and a campsite will increase large vehicles; o I think the majority of visitors will arrive by motorcycle, which will make the noise level intolerable; o Pedestrians use this route and it will only be time before someone is seriously injured or even killed; o Egress onto Tynwald Road is difficult at the best of times but especially so during summer months; o The pedestrians using the lane are often elderly walking dogs or schoolchildren; o The Philip Christian cottage is on Rheast Lane and could be damaged by vehicles trying to negotiate the lane; o Refuse wagons, toilet-emptying vehicles, fire engines and ambulances could not use this portion of the lane and therefore a one-way system just would not work; o The use of both stretches of the lane would attract litter; o The use of the campsite would destroy the peaceful enjoyment of my property and therefore the application should be refused; o Campsite uses often results in late-night revelry, which results in excess noise; o There will also be an increase in vehicular traffic, including often noisy motorcycles; o Open cooking smells are likely; o The toilet and shower facilities may give rise to odours, especially if waste is not removed often, and Rheast Lane is too narrow to allow the type of vehicle that would empty this waste; o Campsite refuse / litter is a problem; o Trespass is an occasional problem, and one neighbour - a widow who lives alone - has reported several instances to police and installed CCTV; o Some form of security lighting will be essential but this may cause a nuisance to neighbours; o The proposal is ill-conceived and would be detrimental to this residential area; o My property has gated access at the rear onto the golf club and there is a high likelihood of people using that access to provide a quick route into the town, invading my privacy; o We are all elderly residents on Links Close; o The associated noise would continue long after we have retired for the evening, depriving us of our normal night's sleep; o There will be a feeling of insecurity knowing that so many strangers are almost living in our back garden; o Rheast Lane is not suitable for vehicles with trailers; o The narrowness of the Lane will amplify traffic noise; o No matter how considerate the campers, there will always be the problem of additional windblown litter; o This has been discussed with neighbours and we collectively feel that this would be detrimental to the residential area; o Our front entrance [that of the dwelling 'Mylvoirrey'] is being used on a regular basis for vehicles gaining safe access to and effecting safe egress from the golf club; o No amount of traffic signs or traffic schemes; o We have two young children and excessive noise late at night and early in the mornings would be particularly disturbing to them;
==== PAGE 6 ====
16/01325/C
Page 6 of 14
o The toilet facilities are proposed to be situated at the top of the site, closest to the residential area. The inevitable smell from these along with cooking smells would prevent us from enjoying our back garden or opening windows and doors in the middle of the summer; o Any extra lighting will require a generator and this will create light and noise pollution; o We received a letter informing us of these plans only a couple of weeks after the application went in!; o To invite dozens, if not hundreds, of motorbikes onto Rheast Lane would be nothing but hazardous to all; o Our Lane is already in a poor condition, with lots of pot holes and all this extra use would damage it throughout; o The greatest concern is the danger of having so many motorbikes flying through the lane would bring to children and pets, as we all know fans of the TT often get carried away with regards speed limits; o Persons on foot on Tynwald Road have to step well into the line of traffic exiting Rheast Lane before oncoming vehicles can be seen; o The sharp left turning at Mylvoirrey has also resulted in much damage to that property; o The state of repair of Rheast Lane is a hazard to pedestrians at night; o The suggested one-way system is in my opening and a resident of Rheast Lane highly dangerous and simply unmanageable; o Would traffic lights be required from the golf club entrance to the lower exit bordering Mylvoirrey to stop accidents occurring?; o I express great concern should either the fire brigade or any emergency vehicle be required to attend this site; o The land between the site and the [Ballatessan Meadow] houses is completely devoid of trees or shrubs that might reduce noise emanating from the site; o While campers might be asked to consider the surrounding residents they will be on holiday and unlikely to appreciate restrictions placed on their actions while using facilities they have paid for; o Inevitably, residents will be disturbed late at night and early in the morning; o There are no details within the application as to how complaints of nuisance or rowdy behaviour will be dealt with; o The applicants have emphasised the convenient proximity of the local bus stops but the proposal is clearly aimed at bikers who are unlikely to be using public transport; o A very conservative estimate of one motorbike per tent results in an additional 200 traffic movements per day on an already inadequate Rheast Lane; o Rheast Lane is very narrow from the entrance to Mylvoirrey to Queens Drive (my Mini barely has clearance); o Residents know that the blind left-hand corner has to be taken 'dead slow', and while I would like to think club members know likewise experience shows otherwise - what chance for visitors? It is an unavoidable choke-point and the Achilles heel in the traffic scheme; o There is an access to the golf course from the Peel Road and opposite the Queen Elizabeth II High School, and a hardcore track could be laid from there to the proposed camping area, reducing the traffic-related disruption to residents, although this would incur expenditure; o At the end of the day this is nothing more than a poorly considered money-making scheme; o This application has the potential to disrupt traffic, the environment and the daily lives of residents throughout the eastern area of Peel; o Any inconvenience and cost created by this scheme should be shouldered by the club and not the residents - notwithstanding that this application should be refused; o The amended information is no more than 'where to put up signs', and it does not matter if these are flashing neon or glow-in-the-dark - none of the concerns regarding safety, risk, traffic congestion and overall inappropriateness raised in the numerous submissions are addressed; o Those noise of motorcycles, loud music and boisterous behaviour of the campers will disrupt my suckler herd of cattle, which will be calving and have calves at foot immediately alongside the campsite. These cattle will be very defensive of their calves and disrupting birthing may result in fatalities resulting in management and financial problems; o If there are lights, these too will cause upset to the cattle;
==== PAGE 7 ====
16/01325/C
Page 7 of 14
o Discarded food items and wrappers (including plastic bags) cause a health risk and plastic bags can be fatal to cattle; o We need to keep a high level of bio-security to guard against disease; o There is a ditch along the boundary hedge on the farm side of the application site, and an underground 6" tile drain that takes this ditchwater to a tributary of the River Neb. There is a waterlogged area in the southeast corner of the practice field; o Any trespassers from the site would cause damage to property, with the possibility of animals escaping; o There would be a fire risk in dry weather if open air cooking is allowed; o The noise and disruption would be detrimental to the scenery, wildlife and nesting birds in the area, especially night-time noise, lights from vehicles and torches or floodlights; o Lighting would impact on the dark skies of the area, which is one of the reasons we chose to live there, and even in June we need to avoid light pollution!
5.4.2 Comments neutral to the proposal within those letters can be summarised as follows:
o If approval is given I ask for a condition restricting the size of vehicles servicing the site; o Should the scheme be approved then the Heras fencing enclosing the site may prevent campers taking short cuts through the surrounding private gardens, although it is not clear as to how this arrangement will work in the event of an emergency; o If approval is given to the site, then it is to be hoped that open-air cooking will be discouraged; o If this application is (somehow) given approval, additional No Entry signs should be erected to prevent vehicles accessing the lane east of the golf club car park entrance and thereby alleviating additional risk and hazard to the occupants of 'The Garey' and 'Ballinderry'.
5.4.3 Comments positive to the proposal within those letters can be summarised as follows:
o The provision of parking on the application seems generous.
5.4.4 The letters have been received from the following people and addresses, and on the dates shown in brackets:
o The owner and occupier of 'Mylvoirrey', Rheast Lane, Peel (6th December 2016); o The owner / occupier of 'Green Close', Rheast Lane, Peel (6th December 2016); o The owners and occupiers of 3 Links Close, Peel (9th December 2016); o The owner and occupier of 'White Lodge', Rheast Lane, Peel (12th, 13th and 14th December 2016 and 2nd February 2017 (twice)); o The owners and occupiers of 4 Links Close, Peel (12th December 2016); o The owners / occupiers of 50 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel (19th December 2016); o The occupier of 'Thalloo Vell', Rheast Lane, Peel (19th December 2016); o The owner of 'The Gables', Rheast Lane, Peel (20th December 2016); o The owner / occupier of 52 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel (20th December 2016); o The owner / occupier of 'Fy Yerrey', Rheast Lane, Peel (21st December 2016); o The occupier and / or owner of 'Ballinderry', Rheast Lane, Peel (21st December 2016 and 31st January 2017); o The owner and occupier of 42 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel (22nd December 2016), and o The tenant of Ballaterson Farm, Glenfaba Road, Peel (22nd December 2016), being the same person as the owner and occupier of 42 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel.
6.0 ASSESSMENT
6.1 The Strategic Plan contains no specific policies relating to the use of land for temporary campsites. In this case, the following assessment focusses on highway safety and the impact on neighbouring living and farming conditions. Were the campsite proposed permanently, its visual impact would also be assessed: however, it is considered that this alone is not a particular concern
==== PAGE 8 ====
16/01325/C
Page 8 of 14
here given that the campsite will only be in use for a few weeks of 2017. It is to be remembered that, although the land is zoned for development purposes (both Residential and Golf Club), it is not zoned for the proposed use, and moreover the situation 'on the ground' is very much one of open fields, albeit with some access allowable via the golf club. The impact of the proposal needs to be judged having due regard to both the extant zoning and also its present use.
Neighbouring living conditions
6.2 As already noted, the easternmost of the dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow (no.52) is, at roughly 50m away, the nearest dwelling to the edge of the application site. The tents shown within the site are roughly 10m away from its northwestern boundary. Number 52 Ballatessan Meadow is set roughly 15m back from its rear boundary line. The dwelling itself is 95m away from the nearest tent, while the other dwellings along Ballatessan Meadow are in excess of 100m distant.
6.3 The land is fairly open in the area such that noise will travel further than would be the case if vegetation or buildings were in place to provide some form of buffering. It is true that odours will also travel further for a similar reason, but in this case it would be difficult to reach a conclusion that any odours that do travel for the nearly 100m between the application site and the nearest dwellings would be so strong as to warrant an objection on this ground. In making this judgement, it is also noted that the proposed use will take place on only the weeks of the year during which the TT and Festival of Motoring events are taking place.
6.4 This same point also holds true with respect to noise transference, and so it needs to be concluded that the harm arising from the proposed use will be so harmful to local living conditions for the four weeks of the year when the campsite is in operation that the application should be refused on that basis. No noise survey has been submitted with the application and so there is no way to make a scientific assessment as to the likely increase in noise that the use may generate, and how material this is relative to the existing situation. Consideration needs to be given to not just the noise created by the people using the campsite, but also to their comings and goings as well as any lighting that might be installed.
6.5 In terms of Links Close, it is noted that these dwellings are shielded somewhat by the dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow, meaning that the campsite itself will not be visible from their curtilages. Moreover, and this is perhaps the key point with respect to the impact of the use, the Ballatessan Meadow dwellings will also act as a barrier to the noise associated with the use of the campsite.
6.6 Therefore, it is considered that the occupiers of dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow are likely to be most affected by the use of the campsite itself, while the occupiers of the dwellings situated on Rheast Lane and Links Close are likely to be affected more by the users of the campsite accessing it.
6.7 The concerns raised by some residents of those dwellings regarding the access gates that they have out from their gardens onto the golf course is a private matter since it is an individual's own choice as to what sort of boundaries they have to their properties (subject, of course, to the appropriate planning approval being in place). It is understood that trespass in general would be a concern, but second-guessing that visitors to the campsite will behave illegally is judged to be an inappropriate basis on which to make decisions. In any case, it is considered that the most direct and obvious route from the campsite to the town of Peel is via the adopted highways, and it is likely that this will be the route people would choose. The presence of fencing to surround the camping area offers further support to this point.
6.8 The impact of the use and those accessing the proposed campsite requires more in-depth assessment. The former is considered first.
==== PAGE 9 ====
16/01325/C
Page 9 of 14
6.9 The land between the proposed campsite and Ballatessan Meadow is, as pointed out by a resident there, largely free of vegetation or other barrier to noise. While the distance 'on the ground' may feel significant, any noise created will likely travel fairly easily across that 100-120m (depending on which dwelling is referred to). Against that is the fact that it is clearly in the interest of the applicant to ensure the site is properly managed. It is entirely to their benefit to seek calm and orderly behaviour on the site as they should not wish to upset nearby residents, and the agent's confirmation of this is both welcome and unsurprising. While it is true that people on holiday can tend towards louder behaviour, and somewhat later in the evenings, than might be expected, or 'normal', for full-time residents, it is also true that people generally want to 'get along' with others for fairly obvious reasons. It can be difficult to not assume the worst in cases like this, and it is readily understood why objections on this basis have been received, but equally there needs to be some faith that - to be blunt - people will behave themselves. It is not ignored that the entirety of the land between the proposed campsite and the dwellings on Ballatessan Meadow is zoned for dwellings, and nor is it ignored that the proposed campsite would be temporary. It is a very difficult balance.
6.10 It is noted that there have been three objections received from the owners / occupiers of three of the dwellings here, and also from the neighbouring farmer. While the number of objections is not in itself significant, they do represent a large number relative to the number of houses that actually face onto this field from the northwest - two come from those dwellings nearest. The concerns raised by these people are reasonable, understandable and could justifiably form a reason to refuse the application. It is also reasonable to conclude that there is only the slight prospect of the zoned land coming forward for residential development in the foreseeable future such that this can only be given very limited weight in the overall balance. (Although the residential zoning was adopted in 1989, no planning application has been submitted for residential development here since then.) The argument that the Island as a whole generates more noise during the motorcycle events is accepted, but this is not in itself a justification to accept additional such impacts if those are deemed harmful. Moreover, any new proposal must be judged having regard to its individual circumstances - and in this case it is noted that Peel is situated well away from the TT course and, moreover, Rheast Lane and Ballatessan Meadow are fairly calm and quiet locations on the edge of Peel.
6.11 Balancing all of the above, while it is noted that the application only seeks approval for a single year, it is concluded that the impact on neighbouring living conditions as well as nearby cattle is sufficient, even for such a short period, to warrant the application's refusal in the context of part (g) of General Policy 2 and criterion (iii) of Environment Policy 22. The balance towards an objection has, in this case, been tipped by the nature of the objections received from the residents on Ballatessan Meadow and the neighbouring farmer.
6.12 The impact of the journeys to and from the proposed use on the residents on Rheast Lane, and also the additional parking that would take place adjacent to the dwellings on Links Close, is perhaps more clear-cut. There will be a significant number of additional vehicles using this highway and the golf club than is currently the case. While the proposed use will only add vehicles for a short period of the year, it seems likely that the addition of these vehicles will cause both traffic problems and noise problems for local residents. This is a lightly used lane and one that cannot readily accommodate increased traffic levels without this being significantly noticeable to the nearby residents who, despite their location fairly near well-used roads, are likely to be used to a somewhat tranquil existence. It is noted that apparently the golf club already uses the practice putting green area on a fairly regular occasion such that its use as an overspill car park is actually likely to be less significantly harmful than if it was only ever used as a practice putting green. However, what is clear is that the use as an overspill car park will be more intensive and for a more concentrated period, and this will likely be harmful to neighbouring living conditions due to the increase in noise, activity and fumes arising from the manoeuvring of vehicles in the area. The proposal is therefore again judged contrary to part (g) of General Policy 2 and criterion (iii) of Environment Policy 22.
Impact on highway safety
==== PAGE 10 ====
16/01325/C
Page 10 of 14
6.13 While the lack of objection from Highway Services is noted, the highway is extremely narrow and its navigation, even for locals, is evidently problematic. The views of the Commissioners are also important to note in reaching a conclusion on this. The existing access onto Tynwald Road is difficult to safely navigate and while this might be reduced by people following the voluntary one- way system, one resident has indicated a clear intention to ignore this, and there is nothing stopping others from acting likewise. While it is possible that this might be addressed by a formal change to the two-way nature of the highway, and this may result in an acceptable level of traffic flow (primarily in terms of the use of the accesses onto and off Rheast Lane), such an approach would not alter or materially improve the effect of additional traffic on Rheast Lane on the people that live there.
6.14 It is therefore concluded that the proposal is also contrary to parts (h) and (i) of General Policy 2 and also to Transport Policy 4.
7.0 RECOMMENDATION
7.1 The area of land the subject of the proposed campsite is zoned for permanent residential development. In some ways, the impact arising from a temporary campsite, proposed for only the coming year of motorbike events, might be said to be minimal. This application has generated not insignificant local concern on a range of matters that are reasonable, albeit without necessarily being capable of representing an unduly harmful impact relative to the policies of the Strategic Plan. In the overall balance, though, it has been concluded that the application has failed to demonstrate that the impacts arising from the proposed use, and also access to that use, would not have an unduly harmful impact on neighbouring living conditions or highway safety.
7.2 Accordingly, the application is recommended for refusal.
7.3 If the Committee is minded to overturn this recommendation, it is in the first instance to be noted that the application seeks approval only for the use during 2017. A condition defining the days during which the campsite could be used would be reasonable, and it would also be reasonable for that condition to allow for a period of time before and after both the TT and MGP periods to allow for the setting up and dismantling of the campsite. The applicant has responded to a request seeking clarification as to what set-up and dismantling period would be reasonable to them, with the requested 5 days either side seeming appropriate. Such a period reflects that of the temporary campsite at Ballakermeen High School in Douglas. The dates requested by the applicant are as follows:
o TT - 22nd May to 14th June 2017. o MGP / Festival of Motorcycling - 14th August to 6th September 2017.
7.4 Consideration may also be given to a condition stating that no approval is given or inferred by approval to the application for any lighting on the site. It may, however, be more appropriate to attach a condition requiring details of a lighting scheme be submitted for approval to the Department. This would allow proper consideration to be given to what lighting would be acceptable in order to ensure an appropriate balance between safety on the campsite and neighbouring living conditions.
7.5 A condition requiring that the site be laid out as per the submitted drawing showing the site layout would also be appropriate in order to ensure proper control of the site.
7.6 Finally, the condition sought by Highway Services is entirely necessary in order that the traffic flow on Rheast Lane is properly managed during the campsite's operation.
8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS
==== PAGE 11 ====
16/01325/C
Page 11 of 14
8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) (No 2) Order 2013, the following persons are automatically interested persons:
o The applicant, or if there is one, the applicant's agent; o The owner and the occupier of any land that is the subject of the application or any other person in whose interest the land becomes vested; o Highway Services of the Department of Infrastructure, and o The local authority in whose district the land the subject of the application is situated.
8.2.1 In addition to those above, article 6(3) of the Order requires the Department to decide which persons (if any) who have made representations with respect to the application, should be treated as having sufficient interest in the subject matter of the application to take part in any subsequent proceedings relating to the application.
8.2.2 In this instance, it is considered that the following persons have sufficient interest and should be awarded the status of an Interested Person: o The owner and occupier of 'Mylvoirrey', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The owner / occupier of 'Green Close', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The owner and occupier of 'White Lodge', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The occupier of 'Thalloo Vell', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The owner of 'The Gables', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The owner / occupier of 'Fy Yerrey', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The occupier and / or owner of 'Ballinderry', Rheast Lane, Peel; o The owner and occupier of 42 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel, and o The owners / occupiers of 50 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel; o The owner / occupier of 52 Ballatessan Meadow, Peel; o The tenant of Ballaterson Farm, Glenfaba Road, Peel; o The owners and occupiers of 3 Links Close, Peel, and o The owners and occupiers of 4 Links Close, Peel.
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Refused Date of Recommendation: 23.02.2017
Conditions and Notes for Approval: C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
This approval is based upon the plans ref 15/02584/01, 03, 05A, 06A, statement and photographs all date stamped as received 28th November 2016, 12th December and 24th January 2017.
I confirm that this decision has been made by the Planning Committee in accordance with the authority afforded to it under the appropriate delegated authority.
Decision Made : ...Permitted.. Committee Meeting Date:...06.03.2017
==== PAGE 12 ====
16/01325/C
Page 12 of 14
Signed :...E RILEY... Presenting Officer
Further to the decision of the Committee an additional report was required (included as supplemental paragraph to the officer report).
Signatory to delete as appropriate YES/NO See below
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
==== PAGE 13 ====
16/01325/C
Page 13 of 14
PLANNING COMMITTEE DECISION 06.03.2017
Application No. :
16/01325/C Applicant : Peel Golf Club Proposal : Change of use of part of practice ground as campsite for 2017 TT and Festival of Motoring periods. Site Address : Field 314539 Rheast Lane Peel Isle Of Man
Presenting Officer : Mr Edmond Riley
Addendum to the Officer’s Report
The Planning Committee debated the matter and determined to overturn the recommendation and approve the application.
Conditions of Approval
C 1. The campsite hereby approved shall only operate between the dates of 22nd May to 14th June 2017 inclusive, such period to allow for the setting up and dismantling of the campsite.
Reason: There remains concern regarding the impact of the proposed campsite on neighbouring properties and highway safety and a temporary period to allow an assessment of those impacts is appropriate.
C 2. During the operation of the campsite, the traffic management scheme as shown on drawing numbers 15/2584/05-A and 15/2584/06-A, both date-stamped as having been received 24th January 2017, shall be in operation and shall be monitored. The information gathered from monitoring should be made available to the Planning Authority upon request.
Reason: In the interests of highway safety.
C 3. Prior to the coming into use of the temporary campsite use hereby approved, a lighting scheme shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Department.
Reason: In the interest of protecting neighbouring living conditions by keep lighting levels to a minimum while also ensuring the safety of the campsite users.
C 4. The temporary campsite use hereby approved shall be laid out in accordance with Drawing 15/2584/03, date-stamped as having been received 14th December 2016.
==== PAGE 14 ====
16/01325/C
Page 14 of 14
Reason: In the interest of ensuring the proper management of the site and in the interest of protecting neighbouring living conditions.
This approval is based upon the plans ref 15/02584/01, 03, 05A, 06A, statement and photographs all date stamped as received 28th November 2016, 12th December and 24th January 2017.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal