Loading document...
==== PAGE 1 ====
20/01203/B Page 1 of 4
PLANNING OFFICER REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Application No. : 20/01203/B Applicant : Mr & Mrs James And Sarah Simpson Proposal : Erection of single storey home gym/yoga studio and garden store Site Address : Ballacaroon Mount Rule Isle Of Man IM4 4HW
Senior Planning Officer: Mr Jason Singleton Photo Taken :
Site Visit :
Expected Decision Level : Officer Delegation
Recommendation
Recommended Decision:
Permitted Date of Recommendation: 14.12.2020 __
Conditions and Notes for Approval
C : Conditions for approval N : Notes attached to conditions
C 1. The development hereby approved shall be begun before the expiration of four years from the date of this decision notice.
Reason: To comply with Article 26 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019 and to avoid the accumulation of unimplemented planning approvals.
C 2. The building hereby approved shall not be occupied at any time other than for purposes incidental to the residential use of the dwelling at Ballacaroon, Mount Rule, Braddan as identified on the approved drawings, and shall not be occupied as an independent dwelling unit.
Reason: To ensure proper control of the development and to avoid any future undesirable fragmentation of the curtilage.
This application has been recommended for approval for the following reason. The planning application would be an acceptable form of development that has been designed to ensure that it would not visually harm the property or that of the surrounding countryside and would comply with Environmental Policy 1 & 2 of the Strategic Plan.
Plans/Drawings/Information; This approval relates to drawings referenced; 001; 201; 02; 03; 04; Photo montage; planting scheme; Support letter all received on 2nd November 2020. __
Interested Person Status - Additional Persons
None
==== PAGE 2 ====
20/01203/B Page 2 of 4
__
Officer’s Report
1.0 THE SITE 1.1 The application site currently on site of an empty site, following the demolition in recent time of the former dwelling (Ballacaroon) and number of redundant stone and pre-fabricated outbuildings at Ballacaroon Farm, Mount Rule, Braddan. The former dwelling was located directly adjacent to the road. To the north of site is the A23 (West Baldwin Road) and to the west of the site is Mount Rule Equestrian Centre. To the east of the site is an unmade access lane. The application site is approximately 0.5ha in area.
2.0 THE PROPOSAL 2.1 Proposed is the erection of a detached building to be used as a home gym/yoga studio and garden store. The building would measure a footprint of 10.6m long and 5.2m wide with a mono-pitched roof. The internal floor plan would be subdivided into two rooms; one a gym / yoga studio with the majority of glazing to south and west elevations and three slim profile tall windows to the north elevation; and the other a garden store with twin doors on the east elevation.
2.2 The building would be constructed from blockwork and finished with a fibre glass roof to mimic a zinc effect roof with standing seam trim; the external walls will be cladded with stone black slate to match the dwellinghouse, windows, doors, guttering and rain water pipes, fascia's and soffits in dark grey to match the dwellinghouse. Connecting the structure to the dwellinghouse is an approx. 1.3m wide decking pathway and to the three sides of the structure.
2.2 The application is accompanied with a design statement which highlights the size and position of the property in relation to the highway, the scale of planting to the northern and eastern boundary (hornbeam and laurel hedge) yew tree hedging, and 14 silver birch trees. The design of the proposed is to complement and match in with the dwellinghouse; and the justification for additional garden storage and for the applicant's personal circumstances and fitness enthusiasm.
3.0 PLANNING POLICY 3.1 In terms of local plan policy, the application site is located within a wider area of land that is designated as open space (agricultural) under the Area Plan for the East 2020.
3.2 In terms of strategic plan policy, the Isle of Man Strategic Plan 2016 contains a number of policies that are considered specifically material to the assessment of this current planning application.
3.3 Spatial Policy 5:
New development will be located within the defined settlements. Development will only be permitted in the countryside in accordance with General Policy 3.
3.4 As the land is not zoned for development, General Policy 3 would be applicable, but as this application is for a single storey structure in the garden to an existing residential property, the principles of the following policies are considered applicable;
3.5 Environment Policy 1 The countryside and its ecology will be protected for its own sake. For the purposes of this policy, the countryside comprises all land which is outside the settlements defined in Appendix 3 at A.3.6 or which is not designated for future development on an Area Plan. Development which would adversely affect the countryside will not be permitted unless there is an over-
==== PAGE 3 ====
20/01203/B Page 3 of 4
riding national need in land use planning terms which outweighs the requirement to protect these areas and for which there is no reasonable and acceptable alternative."
4.0 PLANNING HISTORY 4.1 18/01060/B - Erection of a dwelling with detached garage. Approved.
5.0 REPRESENTATIONS 5.1 The Braddan Commissioners do not object (27.11.2020) 5.2 Highways Services have commented (27/11/20) with no objection
6.0 ASSESSMENT 6.1 The fundamental issues to consider in the assessment of this planning application are;
(i) the principle of development; (ii) the visual impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
(i) Principle 6.2 The site is not within any area zoned for development, therefore as per Spatial Policy 5, any development in the countryside must meet the test of General Policy 3. However, as this application is for a garden building within a residential curtilage in the countryside, we must consider the principles of Environment Policy 1 and 2 which seeks that any development in the countryside is justified to sufficiently outweigh the presumption to the contrary.
6.3 Visual Impact The design of the proposed building is to keep within the palate of finishes and materials utilised on the main dwelling house which ensures the two are read in the same context and considered in keeping. The design and finish would be appropriate for this type of use and would replicate a large shed in the rear garden and would be read in that context from any vantage point of the highway. To help with the visual amenity the level and scale of planting proposed to the eastern boundary (already in place) will, in time, ensure the lower proportions of east elevation of the property are screened from the Highway giving the property more privacy. The proposal is considered to be an appropriate form of development within the residential curtilage and having a neutral visual impact on the wider countryside in accordance with EP1 & 2.
7.0 CONCLUSION 7.1 The planning application would be an acceptable form of development that has been designed to ensure that it would not visually harm the property or that of the surrounding countryside and would comply with Environmental Policy 1 of the Strategic Plan.
8.0 INTERESTED PERSON STATUS 8.1 By virtue of the Town and Country Planning (Development Procedure) Order 2019, the following persons are automatically interested persons: (a) the applicant (including an agent acting on their behalf); (b) any Government Department that has made written representations that the Department considers material; (c) the Highways Division of the Department of Infrastructure; (d) Manx National Heritage where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (e) Manx Utilities where it has made written representations that the Department considers material; (f) the local authority in whose district the land the subject of the application is situated; and (g) a local authority adjoining the authority referred to in paragraph (f) where that adjoining authority has made written representations that the Department considers material.
8.2 The decision maker must determine:
==== PAGE 4 ====
20/01203/B Page 4 of 4
o whether any other comments from Government Departments (other than the Department of Infrastructure Highway Services Division) are material; and o whether there are other persons to those listed above who should be given Interested Person Status __
I can confirm that this decision has been made by a Principal Planner in accordance with the authority afforded to that Officer by the appropriate DEFA Delegation and that in making this decision the Officer has agreed the recommendation in relation to who should be afforded Interested Person Status.
Decision Made : Permitted
Date: 17.12.2020
Determining officer
Signed : C BALMER
Chris Balmer
Principal Planner
Customer note
This copy of the officer report reflects the content of the file copy and has been produced in this form for the benefit of our online services/customers and archive records.
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal