Loading document...
| PA REF: | The department has received (Tick as many as apply) | | --- | --- | | 20/06702/C | Amended plans ☐ | | Name of the case officer: | Additional plans ☐ | | PAUL YSIWATT | Amended Information ☐ | | Date: 30/10/20 | Additional Information ☐ | | | Revisit the proposal description ☐ |
| Is an amendment fee required? | ☐ Yes ☑ No ☐ If NO please state reason: | | --- | --- | | The additional PLU and information has been submitted on request by the Planning Officer. | |
Should the amendment/additional information be fully re-publicised (I.e. Site notice, website, contributors)? ☐ No ☐
If NO please tick one of the following to justify what level of reduced publicity is appropriate and why: - The amendments/additional information are minor and unlikely to be noticeable to those outside the site then consultation may not be required (Although all those who have commented will be notified of the amended plans for information). ☐
The owners of all the neighbouring properties have already commented, the may be appropriate to write them directly in relation to amendments rather than by republicising (Weekly list/Site notice). ☐
Additional/amended information has been provided to address a specific detailed issue from a single consultee/objector and no other comments have been received in relation to this issue, it is therefore considered appropriate to only consult either relevant party (Although all those who have commented will be notified of the amended plans for information) ☐
If a specific consultee(s) or objectors(s) is/are to be contacted, please specify who:
Time frame to/for additional comments: ☐ ☐ (Enter number of calendar days)
| Amendments processed | Date | | --- | --- | | Site Notice Issued | ☐ No ☐ Officer for scanned for the holding area | | Capture Period | ☐ Tech officer |
Copyright in submitted documents remains with their authors. Request removal
