117930

From: Gill Corlett [email protected] Sent: 14 February 2020 12:38 To: DEFA, Planning; Faragher, Paula Cc: Colin Whiteway Subject: RE: Braddan Commissioners' Meeting - 6 February 2020 - Planning

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please take care before opening any attachments or following any links.

Dear All

I can confirm that the Commissioners had no objection to the following planning applications considered at their Board meeting on 6 February 2020

PA20/00024 – Mr P Doyle – Conversion of existing workshop to new dwelling – Woodstock, Vicarage Road, Braddan

PA20/00025 – Mr D Wormald – Alterations and erection of a single storey extension to the rear of the property – Hampton Manor, Quines Hill, Port Soderick, Braddan

PA20/00039 – Mr S Partridge – Replacement of existing conservatory roof with tiles – 5 Ashen Bank, Tromode Woods, Braddan, IM4 4TP

PA19/00404/C – Mr P J Kaneen – Change of use of part of workshop as micro brewery – Kaneens Garage, Main Road, Union Mills, Braddan – AMENDED PLANS

PA20/00058/D – RL360 Management Services – Installation of illuminated information signage – Left hand side of entrance to International House, Isle of Man Business Park, Braddan

The Commissioners wished to object to this application, as they would prefer the proposed sign be down lit not up lit in order to limit light pollution.

PA19/01448/B – Blacks (IOM) Ltd – The Commissioners wished to reiterate that whilst they did not object to the planning application, they would prefer to see this area developed for residential property, not further industrial development.

PA20/00062/D – Cu-Plas Callow Ltd – Erection of non-illuminated signage board – Unit 18, Snugborough Trading Estate, Union Mills, Braddan

The Commissioners wish to object to this application as they do not wish to see a proliferation of signage along the hedgerows on the main Peel Road.

PA20/00063/D – Cu-Plas Callow Ltd – Erection of non-illuminated signage board – Unit 18, Snugborough Trading Estate, Union Mills, Braddan

The Commissioners wished to object to this application as they have already provided a communal sign at the entrance to the Trading Estate in an attempt to cut down on the amount of signage at the entrance to the estate. They believe that adding another large sign in this area would be unsightly.

I trust the above meets with your Committee's approval.

Best regards,

Gill Corlett R&D Officer